Am 23.11.22 um 20:35 schrieb T.J. Mercier:
I've been collecting these typo fixes for a while and it feels like time to send them in.
Signed-off-by: T.J. Mercier tjmercier@google.com
Acked-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com
drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 14 +++++++------- include/linux/dma-buf.h | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c index dd0f83ee505b..614ccd208af4 100644 --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c @@ -1141,7 +1141,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(dma_buf_unmap_attachment, DMA_BUF);
- @dmabuf: [in] buffer which is moving
- Informs all attachmenst that they need to destroy and recreated all their
*/ void dma_buf_move_notify(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
- Informs all attachments that they need to destroy and recreate all their
- mappings.
@@ -1159,11 +1159,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(dma_buf_move_notify, DMA_BUF); /**
- DOC: cpu access
- There are mutliple reasons for supporting CPU access to a dma buffer object:
- There are multiple reasons for supporting CPU access to a dma buffer object:
- Fallback operations in the kernel, for example when a device is connected
- over USB and the kernel needs to shuffle the data around first before
- sending it away. Cache coherency is handled by braketing any transactions
- sending it away. Cache coherency is handled by bracketing any transactions
- with calls to dma_buf_begin_cpu_access() and dma_buf_end_cpu_access()
- access.
@@ -1190,7 +1190,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(dma_buf_move_notify, DMA_BUF);
- replace ION buffers mmap support was needed.
- There is no special interfaces, userspace simply calls mmap on the dma-buf
- fd. But like for CPU access there's a need to braket the actual access,
- fd. But like for CPU access there's a need to bracket the actual access,
- which is handled by the ioctl (DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC). Note that
- DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC can fail with -EAGAIN or -EINTR, in which case it must
- be restarted.
@@ -1264,10 +1264,10 @@ static int __dma_buf_begin_cpu_access(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
- preparations. Coherency is only guaranteed in the specified range for the
- specified access direction.
- @dmabuf: [in] buffer to prepare cpu access for.
- @direction: [in] length of range for cpu access.
- @direction: [in] direction of access.
- After the cpu access is complete the caller should call
- dma_buf_end_cpu_access(). Only when cpu access is braketed by both calls is
- dma_buf_end_cpu_access(). Only when cpu access is bracketed by both calls is
- it guaranteed to be coherent with other DMA access.
- This function will also wait for any DMA transactions tracked through
@@ -1307,7 +1307,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(dma_buf_begin_cpu_access, DMA_BUF);
- actions. Coherency is only guaranteed in the specified range for the
- specified access direction.
- @dmabuf: [in] buffer to complete cpu access for.
- @direction: [in] length of range for cpu access.
- @direction: [in] direction of access.
- This terminates CPU access started with dma_buf_begin_cpu_access().
diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/linux/dma-buf.h index 71731796c8c3..1d61a4f6db35 100644 --- a/include/linux/dma-buf.h +++ b/include/linux/dma-buf.h @@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ struct dma_buf { * @lock: * * Used internally to serialize list manipulation, attach/detach and
* vmap/unmap. Note that in many cases this is superseeded by
* vmap/unmap. Note that in many cases this is superseded by
*/ struct mutex lock;
- dma_resv_lock() on @resv.
@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ struct dma_buf { */ const char *name;
- /** @name_lock: Spinlock to protect name acces for read access. */
- /** @name_lock: Spinlock to protect name access for read access. */ spinlock_t name_lock;
/** @@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ struct dma_buf { * anything the userspace API considers write access. * * - Drivers may just always add a write fence, since that only
* causes unecessarily synchronization, but no correctness issues.
* causes unnecessary synchronization, but no correctness issues.
- Some drivers only expose a synchronous userspace API with no
- pipelining across drivers. These do not set any fences for their