Michal,
2012/2/29 Michal Nazarewicz mina86@mina86.com:
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:35:42 +0100, Barry Song 21cnbao@gmail.com wrote:
2012/2/23 Marek Szyprowski m.szyprowski@samsung.com:
This is (yet another) quick update of CMA patches. I've rebased them onto next-20120222 tree from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git and fixed the bug pointed by Aaro Koskinen.
For the whole series:
Tested-by: Barry Song Baohua.Song@csr.com
and i also write a simple kernel helper to test the CMA:
Would it make sense to make a patch out of it putting it to tools/cma (or similar)?
i can send a patch for this. i am just thinking, should it be placed in tools/ as a test utility or Documents/ as an example to explain CMA to users who want to use cma. i also think we should have a seperate document to explain cma in details in documents/, and my helper program can be placed there.
how do you think?
-- Best regards, _ _ .o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' ,=./ `o ..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o) ooo +----<email/xmpp: mpn@google.com>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--
thanks barry