I've moved it to Wednesday morning, and though scheduling is not final, i've got some editorial privileges.
cheers, Jesse
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Hans Verkuil hverkuil@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Thursday, April 28, 2011 16:51:22 Jesse Barker wrote:
Done. I've created this blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-graphics-wg/+spec/linaro-graphics-o-...
for the discussion. I can't say when it will be scheduled, but only that it will not be scheduled during the mini-summit. I'll put in a request for it to occur one of the mornings before the mini-summit.
Not on Monday, though. We start off the mini-summit with component overviews, so it's probably wise to postpone this topic to Tuesday or Wednesday morning after we've had the overviews. Part of the problem is after all a lack of insight in each others subsystems.
Regards,
Hans
Also, with respect to registration for the mini-summit, if you've registered, I can put in a request that none of the other sessions you've registered for as required participant will be scheduled during the mini-summit as well.
cheers, Jesse
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Hans Verkuil hverkuil@xs4all.nl wrote:
We could have a morning session on the relationships between DRM/KMS/FB/V4L/MC. It is not always obvious what API/subsystem should control what (and that's even more complex for SoCs that can dynamically switch from a framebuffer to a v4l node and back depending on the use case).
I'm interesting in that. Jesse Barnes is floating an rfc patch for overlay support in KMS which seems to have the most applications for embedded SoCs (besides terribly old desktop hw). If many of the relevant people are there, that would be a great opportunity to discuss the graphics output handling in embedded platforms (and how to get there).
-Daniel
Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch - +41 (0) 79 364 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch