13 Jul
2016
13 Jul
'16
11:02 a.m.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:20:14AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:38:52AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
Also, I'm not a particular fan of the k* naming, but I see 'fence' is already taken.
Agreed, I really want to rename the dma-buf fence to struct dma_fence - we would need to do that whilst it dma-buf fencing is still in its infancy.
+1 on dma_fence, seems to make more sense than plain struct fence. Probably best to do after the recent pile of work from Gustavo to de-stage sync_file has landed. -Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch