Hi TJ,
Thanks for your review
On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 11:03:41PM +0200, T.J. Mercier wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 4:41 PM Maxime Ripard mripard@kernel.org wrote:
Following a recent discussion at last Plumbers, John Stultz, Sumit Sewal, TJ Mercier and I came to an agreement that we should document what the dma-buf heaps names are expected to be, and what the buffers attributes you'll get should be documented.
Let's create that doc to make sure those attributes and names are guaranteed going forward.
Hey, thanks for sending this!
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard mripard@kernel.org
To: Jonathan Corbet corbet@lwn.net To: Sumit Semwal sumit.semwal@linaro.org Cc: Benjamin Gaignard benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com Cc: Brian Starkey Brian.Starkey@arm.com Cc: John Stultz jstultz@google.com Cc: "T.J. Mercier" tjmercier@google.com Cc: "Christian König" christian.koenig@amd.com Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Documentation/userspace-api/dma-buf-heaps.rst | 71 +++++++++++++++++++ Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst | 1 + 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/userspace-api/dma-buf-heaps.rst
diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/dma-buf-heaps.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/dma-buf-heaps.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..00436227b542 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/dma-buf-heaps.rst @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+============================== +Allocating dma-buf using heaps +==============================
+Dma-buf Heaps are a way for userspace to allocate dma-buf objects. They are +typically used to allocate buffers from a specific allocation pool, or to share +buffers across frameworks.
+Heaps +=====
+A heap represent a specific allocator. The Linux kernel currently supports the
"represents"
+following heaps:
- The ``system`` heap allocates virtually contiguous, cacheable, buffers
Virtually contiguous sounds a little weird to me here. Sure, that's what userspace will get when it maps the buffer (and I guess this *is* UAPI documentation after all), but I'm not sure it's correct to say that's a property of the buffer itself? What if we invert this and instead say that there is NO guarantee that the memory for the buffer:
- is physically contiguous
- has any particular alignment (greater than page aligned)
- has any particular page size (large order allocations are attempted
first, but not guaranteed or even likely on some systems)
- has bounds on physical addresses
Maybe that is too much detail here...
Yeah, I don't know.
It's getting philosophical, but I guess there's an infinite number of guarantees we wouldn't provide. It seems easier for me to maintain a list of the things a buffer is/has rather than the opposite.
But maybe we can rephrase virtually contiguous if it's weird to you?
- The ``reserved`` heap allocates physically contiguous, cacheable, buffers.
- Depending on the platform, it might be called differently:
- Acer Iconia Tab A500: ``linux,cma``
- Allwinner sun4i, sun5i and sun7i families: ``default-pool``
- Amlogic A1: ``linux,cma``
- Amlogic G12A/G12B/SM1: ``linux,cma``
- Amlogic GXBB/GXL: ``linux,cma``
- ASUS EeePad Transformer TF101: ``linux,cma``
- ASUS Google Nexus 7 (Project Bach / ME370TG) E1565: ``linux,cma``
- ASUS Google Nexus 7 (Project Nakasi / ME370T) E1565: ``linux,cma``
- ASUS Google Nexus 7 (Project Nakasi / ME370T) PM269: ``linux,cma``
- Asus Transformer Infinity TF700T: ``linux,cma``
- Asus Transformer Pad 3G TF300TG: ``linux,cma``
- Asus Transformer Pad TF300T: ``linux,cma``
- Asus Transformer Pad TF701T: ``linux,cma``
- Asus Transformer Prime TF201: ``linux,cma``
- ASUS Vivobook S 15: ``linux,cma``
- Cadence KC705: ``linux,cma``
- Digi International ConnectCore 6UL: ``linux,cma``
- Freescale i.MX8DXL EVK: ``linux,cma``
- Freescale TQMa8Xx: ``linux,cma``
- Hisilicon Hikey: ``linux,cma``
- Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6: ``linux,cma``
- Lenovo ThinkPad X13s: ``linux,cma``
- Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x: ``linux,cma``
- LG Optimus 4X HD P880: ``linux,cma``
- LG Optimus Vu P895: ``linux,cma``
- Loongson 2k0500, 2k1000 and 2k2000: ``linux,cma``
- Microsoft Romulus: ``linux,cma``
- NXP i.MX8ULP EVK: ``linux,cma``
- NXP i.MX93 9x9 QSB: ``linux,cma``
- NXP i.MX93 11X11 EVK: ``linux,cma``
- NXP i.MX93 14X14 EVK: ``linux,cma``
- NXP i.MX95 19X19 EVK: ``linux,cma``
- Ouya Game Console: ``linux,cma``
- Pegatron Chagall: ``linux,cma``
- PHYTEC phyCORE-AM62A SOM: ``linux,cma``
- PHYTEC phyCORE-i.MX93 SOM: ``linux,cma``
- Qualcomm SC8280XP CRD: ``linux,cma``
- Qualcomm X1E80100 CRD: ``linux,cma``
- Qualcomm X1E80100 QCP: ``linux,cma``
- RaspberryPi: ``linux,cma``
- Texas Instruments AM62x SK board family: ``linux,cma``
- Texas Instruments AM62A7 SK: ``linux,cma``
- Toradex Apalis iMX8: ``linux,cma``
- TQ-Systems i.MX8MM TQMa8MxML: ``linux,cma``
- TQ-Systems i.MX8MN TQMa8MxNL: ``linux,cma``
- TQ-Systems i.MX8MPlus TQMa8MPxL: ``linux,cma``
- TQ-Systems i.MX8MQ TQMa8MQ: ``linux,cma``
- TQ-Systems i.MX93 TQMa93xxLA/TQMa93xxCA SOM: ``linux,cma``
- TQ-Systems MBA6ULx Baseboard: ``linux,cma``
This part LGTM. Might be worth it to document that a CMA region must be specified on the kernel command line. Otherwise this heap won't show up at runtime by only enabling the kernel configs necessary to build it.
Really? My understanding was that you need a default CMA region, which happens either if you have cma= on the kernel command line, a default CMA pool in the DT, or if CMA_SIZE_MBYTES isn't set to 0?
Maxime