Am 13.10.21 um 16:21 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 01:37:37PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Simplifying the code a bit.
v2: add missing rcu_read_lock()/unlock() v3: switch to locked version
Signed-off-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com
Please make sure you also apply this to the new copy of this code in drm/sched. This one here is up for deletion, once I get all the driver conversions I have landed ...
Yeah, I do have that. Only added this patch here for completeness so that I could at least consider dropping the old access functions.
Put I will hold it back, just ping me when the code in question is removed.
Christian.
-Daniel
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 26 +++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c index 09c820045859..4dcdec6487bb 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c @@ -1340,31 +1340,15 @@ int drm_gem_fence_array_add_implicit(struct xarray *fence_array, struct drm_gem_object *obj, bool write) {
- int ret;
- struct dma_fence **fences;
- unsigned int i, fence_count;
- if (!write) {
struct dma_fence *fence =dma_resv_get_excl_unlocked(obj->resv);return drm_gem_fence_array_add(fence_array, fence);- }
- struct dma_resv_iter cursor;
- struct dma_fence *fence;
- int ret = 0;
- ret = dma_resv_get_fences(obj->resv, NULL,
&fence_count, &fences);- if (ret || !fence_count)
return ret;- for (i = 0; i < fence_count; i++) {
ret = drm_gem_fence_array_add(fence_array, fences[i]);
- dma_resv_for_each_fence(&cursor, obj->resv, write, fence) {
ret = drm_gem_fence_array_add(fence_array, fence);
- for (; i < fence_count; i++)
dma_fence_put(fences[i]);- kfree(fences); return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_gem_fence_array_add_implicit);
-- 2.25.1