On 11/27/25 11:57, Philipp Stanner wrote:
On Thu, 2025-11-13 at 15:51 +0100, Christian König wrote:
Calling dma_fence_is_signaled() here is illegal!
OK, but why is that patch in this series?
Because the next patch depends on it, otherwise the series won't compile.
My plan is to push the amdgpu patches through amd-staging-drm-next as soon as Alex rebased that branch on drm-next during the next cycle.
Regards, Christian.
P.
Signed-off-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_fence.c | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_fence.c index 1ef758ac5076..09c919f72b6c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_fence.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_fence.c @@ -120,12 +120,6 @@ static bool amdkfd_fence_enable_signaling(struct dma_fence *f) { struct amdgpu_amdkfd_fence *fence = to_amdgpu_amdkfd_fence(f);
- if (!fence)
return false;- if (dma_fence_is_signaled(f))
return true;if (!fence->svm_bo) { if (!kgd2kfd_schedule_evict_and_restore_process(fence->mm, f)) return true;