Hi Jon,
On 23 August 2016 at 18:38, Jonathan Corbet corbet@lwn.net wrote:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 08:01:35 +0200 Daniel Vetter daniel@ffwll.ch wrote:
I'm also not too sure about whether dma-buf really should be it's own subdirectory. It's plucked from the device-drivers.tmpl, I think an overall device-drivers/ for all the misc subsystems and support code would be better. Then one toc there, which fans out to either kernel-doc and overview docs.
I'm quite convinced it shouldn't be.
If you get a chance, could you have a look at the "RFC: The beginning of a proper driver-api book" series I posted yesterday (yes, I should have copied more of you, sorry)? It shows the direction I would like to go with driver API documentation, and, assuming we go that way, I'd like the dma-buf documentation to fit into that.
Thanks for your comments, and direction. I'll rework the patches on top of yours then. I'll have a look at your patches to think about how do we handle API guides / detailed documentation as well.
Thanks,
jon
Best, Sumit.