Hi Tomasz,
On 8 August 2012 19:36, Daniel Vetter daniel@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 03:53:10PM +0200, Tomasz Stanislawski wrote:
Hi Laurent,
On 08/08/2012 03:35 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Tomasz,
Thanks for the patch.
Thanks for the patch; may I ask you to split it into 2 patches (1 dma-buf and 1 drm) and submit? That ways, either Dave or I can take the patches for either pull request. With that, please feel free to add my Acked-by as well.
On Wednesday 08 August 2012 12:17:41 Tomasz Stanislawski wrote:
This patch adds reference counting on a module that exports dma-buf and implements its operations. This prevents the module from being unloaded while DMABUF file is in use.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Stanislawski t.stanislaws@samsung.com
Documentation/dma-buf-sharing.txt | 3 ++- drivers/base/dma-buf.c | 10 +++++++++- drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dmabuf.c | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_prime.c | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_prime.c | 1 + drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_gem_dmabuf.c | 1 + include/linux/dma-buf.h | 2 ++ 8 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
[snip]
@@ -96,6 +98,7 @@ struct dma_buf *dma_buf_export(void *priv, const struct dma_buf_ops *ops, struct file *file;
if (WARN_ON(!priv || !ops
|| !ops->ownerThank you for spotting this. I didn'y know that try_get_module returned true is module was NULL.
BTW. Is it worth to add ".owner = THIS_MODULE," to all dma_buf exporters in this patch?
Yeah, I think that makes sense. Otherwise it might get lost somewhere, i.e. you can smash my Ack on this.
-Daniel
Daniel Vetter Mail: daniel@ffwll.ch Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48