-----Original Message----- From: dri-devel dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org On Behalf Of Christian König Sent: Monday, October 6, 2025 9:47 AM To: sumit.semwal@linaro.org; linux-media@vger.kernel.org; dri- devel@lists.freedesktop.org; linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org; simona.vetter@ffwll.ch Subject: [PATCH 2/2] dma-buf: improve sg_table debugging hack
Instead of just mangling the page link create a copy of the sg_table but only copy over the DMA addresses and not the pages.
This made the issue obvious. If I abuse this now how will I know I am doing the wrong thing?
Still quite a hack but this at least allows the exporter to properly keeps it's sg_table intact.
This is important for example for the system DMA-heap which needs it's sg_table to sync CPU writes with device accesses.
So the mangling actually breaks a usage? I thought that the usage was incorrect...is the dma-heap using this incorrectly?
Signed-off-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com
drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c index 2305bb2cc1f1..1fe5781d8862 100644 --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c @@ -828,21 +828,59 @@ void dma_buf_put(struct dma_buf *dmabuf) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(dma_buf_put, "DMA_BUF");
-static void mangle_sg_table(struct sg_table *sg_table) +static int dma_buf_mangle_sg_table(struct sg_table **sg_table) { -#ifdef CONFIG_DMABUF_DEBUG
- int i;
- struct scatterlist *sg;
- /* To catch abuse of the underlying struct page by importers mix
* up the bits, but take care to preserve the low SG_ bits to* not corrupt the sgt. The mixing is undone on unmap* before passing the sgt back to the exporter.
- struct sg_table *to, *from = *sg_table;
- struct scatterlist *to_sg, *from_sg;
- int i, ret;
- if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMABUF_DEBUG))
return 0;- /*
* To catch abuse of the underlying struct page by importers copy the* sg_table without copying the page_link and give only the copy backto
*/* the importer.
- for_each_sgtable_sg(sg_table, sg, i)
sg->page_link ^= ~0xffUL;-#endif
to = kzalloc(sizeof(*to), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!to)
return -ENOMEM;ret = sg_alloc_table(to, from->nents, GFP_KERNEL);
if (ret)
goto free_to;to_sg = to->sgl;
for_each_sgtable_dma_sg(from, from_sg, i) {
sg_set_page(to_sg, NULL, 0, 0);sg_dma_address(to_sg) = sg_dma_address(from_sg);sg_dma_len(to_sg) = sg_dma_len(from_sg);
Is the indentation correct here?
M
to_sg = sg_next(to_sg);- }
- /*
* Store the original sg_table in the first page_link of the copy so* that we can revert everything back again on unmap.*/- to->sgl[0].page_link = (unsigned long)from;
- *sg_table = to;
- return 0;
+free_to:
- kfree(to);
- return ret;
+}
+static void dma_buf_demangle_sg_table(struct sg_table **sg_table) +{
- struct sg_table *copy = *sg_table;
- if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMABUF_DEBUG))
return;- *sg_table = (void *)copy->sgl[0].page_link;
- sg_free_table(copy);
- kfree(copy);
}
static inline bool @@ -1139,7 +1177,9 @@ struct sg_table *dma_buf_map_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach, if (ret < 0) goto error_unmap; }
- mangle_sg_table(sg_table);
ret = dma_buf_mangle_sg_table(&sg_table);
if (ret)
goto error_unmap;if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG)) { struct scatterlist *sg;
@@ -1220,7 +1260,7 @@ void dma_buf_unmap_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
dma_resv_assert_held(attach->dmabuf->resv);
- mangle_sg_table(sg_table);
dma_buf_demangle_sg_table(&sg_table); attach->dmabuf->ops->unmap_dma_buf(attach, sg_table, direction);
if (dma_buf_pin_on_map(attach))
-- 2.43.0