Am 15.09.20 um 12:39 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 3:29 PM Christian König ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com wrote:
This reverts commit 26d3ac3cb04d171a861952e89324e347598a347f.
We need to figure out if dma_buf_mmap() is valid or not first.
Signed-off-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com
The trouble is that doing dma-buf mmap by looking at the struct pages behind the sg list and just inserting those into userspace doesn't really work any better. You still won't get the unmap_mapping_range and hence pte shoot-down. So maybe dma_buf_mmap forwarding doesn't work, but this doesn't make it any better.
Good point. Question is what should we do? Return -EPERM?
Also commit message should probably explain a bit the context here, not a lot of people have been in our private discussion on this.
Well, that's certain true.
Christian.
-Daniel
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c index 0a952f27c184..cd727343f72b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c @@ -594,9 +594,6 @@ int drm_gem_shmem_mmap(struct drm_gem_object *obj, struct vm_area_struct *vma) /* Remove the fake offset */ vma->vm_pgoff -= drm_vma_node_start(&obj->vma_node);
if (obj->import_attach)
return dma_buf_mmap(obj->dma_buf, vma, 0);
shmem = to_drm_gem_shmem_obj(obj); ret = drm_gem_shmem_get_pages(shmem);
-- 2.17.1
dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel