On Thursday 09 October 2014 14:18:00 Marek Szyprowski wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c index 59fb12e..70780ad 100644 --- a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c +++ b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
if (!rmem || !rmem->ops || !rmem->ops->device_init)
return;
return -EINVAL;
rmem->ops->device_init(rmem, dev); dev_info(dev, "assigned reserved memory node %s\n", rmem->name);
return 0;
}
You don't actually return the value from ->device_init() here but always return 0 on success. There are no callers of this function, so it's hard to tell if this actually makes a difference, but it contradicts your patch description.
diff --git a/include/linux/of_reserved_mem.h b/include/linux/of_reserved_mem.h index 5b5efae..ad2f670 100644 --- a/include/linux/of_reserved_mem.h +++ b/include/linux/of_reserved_mem.h @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ struct reserved_mem { }; struct reserved_mem_ops {
void (*device_init)(struct reserved_mem *rmem,
int (*device_init)(struct reserved_mem *rmem, struct device *dev); void (*device_release)(struct reserved_mem *rmem, struct device *dev);
This part is definitely needed to avoid the new compile warnings we are getting.
Arnd