fix wrong list name for linaro y2038.
On 29, Jun 22:26 "Bamvor Zhang Jian" bamvor.zhangjian@linaro.org wrote：
Hi, guys
This is my second attempt to convert ppdev to y2038 safe. The first version is here[1].
There are two parts in my patches. 01/02 migrate timeval relative struct to 64bit time_t types. 03/04 convert ppdev to y2038 safe in both native 32bit and compat application.
My patches try to follow the idea from arnd y2038 syscalls patches[2], but my patches not depend on them.
The reason why I choose ppdev is the ppdev use the timexxx directly in ioctl compare with the other drivers embedded timexxx in their own type.
Build pass on arm and arm64 on each patches(with and without CONFIG_COMPAT_TIME). Unfortunately, there is no parport device (printer) in my test environment. Hope others could help to test it.
[1] https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/y2038/2015-June/000522.html [2]
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/arnd/playground.git/log/?h=y2038...
Bamvor Zhang Jian (4): y2038: add 64bit time_t support in timeval for 32bit architecture time64: add timeval64 helper for compat syscalls ppdev: add compat ioctl y2038: convert ppdev to 2038 safe
drivers/char/ppdev.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- include/linux/compat.h | 3 +++ include/linux/time64.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-- include/uapi/linux/ppdev.h | 14 ++++++++++++-- include/uapi/linux/time.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++ kernel/compat.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ kernel/time/time.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 7 files changed, 136 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
-- 2.1.4