On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 13:41:33 -0600 Mathieu Poirier mathieu.poirier@linaro.org wrote:
@@ -430,24 +420,30 @@ static int cs_etm__setup_queue(struct cs_etm_auxtrace *etm, struct auxtrace_queue *queue, unsigned int queue_nr) {
- int ret = 0; struct cs_etm_queue *etmq = queue->priv;
if (list_empty(&queue->head) || etmq)
return 0;
goto out;
What does 'goto out' buy us here? Having the return in-place is easier/clearer to read.
- etmq = cs_etm__alloc_queue(etm, queue_nr);
- etmq = cs_etm__alloc_queue(etm);
- if (!etmq)
return -ENOMEM;
- if (!etmq) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
- }
same here.
queue->priv = etmq;
- if (queue->cpu != -1)
etmq->cpu = queue->cpu;
- etmq->etm = etm;
- etmq->queue_nr = queue_nr;
- etmq->cpu = queue->cpu;
the != -1 condition above is being removed and not replaced, yet there's no explanation in the commit text. Should it be a part of a different patch?
Kim