We already test branch output in perf script mode, but then retest it in Perf report mode. This is more of a test of Perf itself than Coresight because Perf uses the same samples to generate both outputs. Also we're already testing instruction output in Perf report mode.
Remove this test for a speedup. On the systemwide test also remove the Perf report test because systemwide mode records a lot more data so running multiple tests on it has a big runtime impact.
Signed-off-by: James Clark james.clark@linaro.org --- tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_coresight.sh | 18 +----------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_coresight.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_coresight.sh index bbf89e944e7b..39553702c1f3 100755 --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_coresight.sh +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_arm_coresight.sh @@ -52,17 +52,6 @@ perf_script_branch_samples() { grep -E " +$1 +[0-9]+ .* +branches:(.*:)? +" > /dev/null 2>&1 }
-perf_report_branch_samples() { - echo "Looking at perf.data file for reporting branch samples:" - - # Below is an example of the branch samples reporting: - # 73.04% 73.04% touch libc-2.27.so [.] _dl_addr - # 7.71% 7.71% touch libc-2.27.so [.] getenv - # 2.59% 2.59% touch ld-2.27.so [.] strcmp - perf report --stdio -i ${perfdata} 2>&1 | \ - grep -E " +[0-9]+.[0-9]+% +[0-9]+.[0-9]+% +$1 " > /dev/null 2>&1 -} - perf_report_instruction_samples() { echo "Looking at perf.data file for instruction samples:"
@@ -123,7 +112,6 @@ arm_cs_iterate_devices() {
record_touch_file $device_name $2 && perf_script_branch_samples touch && - perf_report_branch_samples touch && perf_report_instruction_samples touch
err=$? @@ -154,9 +142,7 @@ arm_cs_etm_system_wide_test() {
# System-wide mode should include perf samples so test for that # instead of ls - perf_script_branch_samples perf && - perf_report_branch_samples perf && - perf_report_instruction_samples perf + perf_script_branch_samples perf
err=$? arm_cs_report "CoreSight system wide testing" $err @@ -179,7 +165,6 @@ arm_cs_etm_snapshot_test() { wait $PERFPID
perf_script_branch_samples dd && - perf_report_branch_samples dd && perf_report_instruction_samples dd
err=$? @@ -191,7 +176,6 @@ arm_cs_etm_basic_test() { perf record -o ${perfdata} "$@" -m,8M -- ls > /dev/null 2>&1
perf_script_branch_samples ls && - perf_report_branch_samples ls && perf_report_instruction_samples ls
err=$?