To improve clarity, let's update the comment for etm4_os_unlock to use the name of the register as per the ETM architecture specification.
The existing comment is also misleading as it suggests any value written to TRCOSLAR unlocks the trace registers, however it must be '0' - let's also correct this.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray andrew.murray@arm.com Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose suzuki.poulose@arm.com --- drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c index a47f29ecdd38..86945f054cf8 100644 --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static enum cpuhp_state hp_online;
static void etm4_os_unlock(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata) { - /* Writing any value to ETMOSLAR unlocks the trace registers */ + /* Writing 0 to TRCOSLAR unlocks the trace registers */ writel_relaxed(0x0, drvdata->base + TRCOSLAR); drvdata->os_unlock = true; isb();