On Tue, Jun 02, 2026 at 03:26:47PM +0100, James Clark wrote:
[...]
@@ -22,3 +23,4 @@ CFLAGS_brstack.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE CFLAGS_datasym.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE CFLAGS_traploop.o = -g -O0 -fno-inline -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE CFLAGS_inlineloop.o = -g -O2 +CFLAGS_deterministic.o = -g -O0
I have no strong opinion for using 'noinline' in source or using the global option '-fno-inline', just thought this is not easy to follow up if anyone (likely myself) will write a new workload for disabling inline. Could we have consistent style for this?
For the patch itself:
Reviewed-by: Leo Yan leo.yan@arm.com