minor nit: Subject: s/qcom,coresight-static-replicator/arm,coresight-static-replicator ? There is no "qcom,coresight-static-replicator" compatible.
On 05/07/2024 10:02, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 05/07/2024 10:51, Tao Zhang wrote:
Add a new property "filter_src" to label the source corresponding to the output connection for a static replicator. By combining a funnel and a static replicator in devicetree, a new device that supports multi-port input and multi-port output is implemented. In order to match the output port with the input port and successfully build the trace path, add this new property to indicate the data source corresponding to this output port.
Signed-off-by: Tao Zhang quic_taozha@quicinc.com
.../arm/arm,coresight-static-replicator.yaml | 18 +++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,coresight-static-replicator.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,coresight-static-replicator.yaml index 1892a091ac35..d9538563f9c6 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,coresight-static-replicator.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,coresight-static-replicator.yaml @@ -45,7 +45,21 @@ properties: patternProperties: '^port@[01]$': description: Output connections to CoreSight Trace bus
$ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
$ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/$defs/port-base
properties:
endpoint:
$ref: /schemas/media/video-interfaces.yaml#
Ehm? How is this video interface?
properties:
filter_src:
There are no properties with underscores...
$ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
description:
defines a phandle reference to an associated CoreSight trace device.
When the associated trace device is enabled, then the respective
trace path will be built and enabled.
How does it differ from remote endpoint? What is "respective trace path"?
Apparently, there is some "magic" hard coded filtering in the replicators, which only passes through trace from a particular "source" device. The documentation above doesn't explain this clearly.
it could be:
"phandle to the coresight trace source device matching the hard coded filtering for this port"
This could be different from the "remote endpoint" as there could be intermediate components between the phandle "source" and the port.
Suzuki
<form letter> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people and lists to CC (and consider --no-git-fallback argument). It might happen, that command when run on an older kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base your patches on recent Linux kernel.
Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline) or work on fork of kernel (don't, instead use mainline). Just use b4 and everything should be fine, although remember about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new patches to the patchset.
</form letter>
Best regards, Krzysztof