Linaro-mm-sig July 2021

linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org

17 participants
54 discussions

[PATCH 0/2] drm/msm: Reduce fence signal latency

by Rob Clark

From: Rob Clark <robdclark(a)chromium.org> A couple tweaks to reduce fence signal latency. Rob Clark (2): drm/msm: Let fences read directly from memptrs drm/msm: Signal fences sooner drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fence.c | 11 +++++-- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fence.h | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++--- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++------------ drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_ringbuffer.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) -- 2.31.1

2 years, 9 months

[PATCH] dma-buf: WARN on dmabuf release with pending attachments

by Charan Teja Reddy

It is expected from the clients to follow the below steps on an imported dmabuf fd: a) dmabuf = dma_buf_get(fd) // Get the dmabuf from fd b) dma_buf_attach(dmabuf); // Clients attach to the dmabuf o Here the kernel does some slab allocations, say for dma_buf_attachment and may be some other slab allocation in the dmabuf->ops->attach(). c) Client may need to do dma_buf_map_attachment(). d) Accordingly dma_buf_unmap_attachment() should be called. e) dma_buf_detach () // Clients detach to the dmabuf. o Here the slab allocations made in b) are freed. f) dma_buf_put(dmabuf) // Can free the dmabuf if it is the last reference. Now say an erroneous client failed at step c) above thus it directly called dma_buf_put(), step f) above. Considering that it may be the last reference to the dmabuf, buffer will be freed with pending attachments left to the dmabuf which can show up as the 'memory leak'. This should at least be reported as the WARN(). Signed-off-by: Charan Teja Reddy <charante(a)codeaurora.org> --- drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c index 511fe0d..733c8b1 100644 --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ static void dma_buf_release(struct dentry *dentry) if (dmabuf->resv == (struct dma_resv *)&dmabuf[1]) dma_resv_fini(dmabuf->resv); + WARN_ON(!list_empty(&dmabuf->attachments)); module_put(dmabuf->owner); kfree(dmabuf->name); kfree(dmabuf); -- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

2 years, 9 months

[PATCH] drm/msm: Add fence->wait() op

by Rob Clark

From: Rob Clark <robdclark(a)chromium.org> Somehow we had neither ->wait() nor dma_fence_signal() calls, and no one noticed. Oops. Note that this removes the !timeout case, which has not been used in a long time. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark(a)chromium.org> --- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fence.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fence.c index cd59a5918038..8ee96b90ded6 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fence.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fence.c @@ -38,11 +38,10 @@ static inline bool fence_completed(struct msm_fence_context *fctx, uint32_t fenc return (int32_t)(fctx->completed_fence - fence) >= 0; } -/* legacy path for WAIT_FENCE ioctl: */ -int msm_wait_fence(struct msm_fence_context *fctx, uint32_t fence, - ktime_t *timeout, bool interruptible) +static signed long wait_fence(struct msm_fence_context *fctx, uint32_t fence, + signed long remaining_jiffies, bool interruptible) { - int ret; + signed long ret; if (fence > fctx->last_fence) { DRM_ERROR_RATELIMITED("%s: waiting on invalid fence: %u (of %u)\n", @@ -50,33 +49,34 @@ int msm_wait_fence(struct msm_fence_context *fctx, uint32_t fence, return -EINVAL; } - if (!timeout) { - /* no-wait: */ - ret = fence_completed(fctx, fence) ? 0 : -EBUSY; + if (interruptible) { + ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(fctx->event, + fence_completed(fctx, fence), + remaining_jiffies); } else { - unsigned long remaining_jiffies = timeout_to_jiffies(timeout); - - if (interruptible) - ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(fctx->event, - fence_completed(fctx, fence), - remaining_jiffies); - else - ret = wait_event_timeout(fctx->event, - fence_completed(fctx, fence), - remaining_jiffies); - - if (ret == 0) { - DBG("timeout waiting for fence: %u (completed: %u)", - fence, fctx->completed_fence); - ret = -ETIMEDOUT; - } else if (ret != -ERESTARTSYS) { - ret = 0; - } + ret = wait_event_timeout(fctx->event, + fence_completed(fctx, fence), + remaining_jiffies); + } + + if (ret == 0) { + DBG("timeout waiting for fence: %u (completed: %u)", + fence, fctx->completed_fence); + ret = -ETIMEDOUT; + } else if (ret != -ERESTARTSYS) { + ret = 0; } return ret; } +/* legacy path for WAIT_FENCE ioctl: */ +int msm_wait_fence(struct msm_fence_context *fctx, uint32_t fence, + ktime_t *timeout, bool interruptible) +{ + return wait_fence(fctx, fence, timeout_to_jiffies(timeout), interruptible); +} + /* called from workqueue */ void msm_update_fence(struct msm_fence_context *fctx, uint32_t fence) { @@ -114,10 +114,19 @@ static bool msm_fence_signaled(struct dma_fence *fence) return fence_completed(f->fctx, f->base.seqno); } +static signed long msm_fence_wait(struct dma_fence *fence, bool intr, + signed long timeout) +{ + struct msm_fence *f = to_msm_fence(fence); + + return wait_fence(f->fctx, fence->seqno, timeout, intr); +} + static const struct dma_fence_ops msm_fence_ops = { .get_driver_name = msm_fence_get_driver_name, .get_timeline_name = msm_fence_get_timeline_name, .signaled = msm_fence_signaled, + .wait = msm_fence_wait, }; struct dma_fence * -- 2.31.1

2 years, 9 months

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH v5 0/2] Add p2p via dmabuf to habanalabs

by Greg KH

On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 05:05:59PM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote: > Hi, > This is v5 of this patch-set following again a long email thread. > > It contains fixes to the implementation according to the review that Jason > did on v4. Jason, I appreciate your feedback. If you can take another look > to see I didn't miss anything that would be great. > > The details of the fixes are in the changelog in the commit message of > the second patch. > > There was one issue with your proposal to set the orig_nents to 0. I did > that, but I also had to restore it to nents before calling sg_free_table > because that function uses orig_nents to iterate. Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org>

2 years, 9 months

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH v8 0/5] drm: address potential UAF bugs with drm_master ptrs

by Daniel Vetter

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 2:44 PM Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 21/7/21 6:29 pm, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 6:12 AM Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi > > <desmondcheongzx(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 21/7/21 2:24 am, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >>> On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 12:35:03PM +0800, Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> In the previous thread on this series we decided to remove a patch that was violating a lockdep requirement in drm_lease. In addition to this change, I took a closer look at the CI logs for the Basic Acceptance Tests and noticed that another regression was introduced. The new patch 2 is a response to this. > >>>> > >>>> Overall, this series addresses potential use-after-free errors when dereferencing pointers to struct drm_master. These were identified after one such bug was caught by Syzbot in drm_getunique(): > >>>> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=148d2f1dfac64af52ffd27b661981a540724f8… > >>>> > >>>> The series is broken up into five patches: > >>>> > >>>> 1. Move a call to drm_is_current_master() out from a section locked by &dev->mode_config.mutex in drm_mode_getconnector(). This patch does not apply to stable. > >>>> > >>>> 2. Move a call to drm_is_current_master() out from the RCU read-side critical section in drm_clients_info(). > >>>> > >>>> 3. Implement a locked version of drm_is_current_master() function that's used within drm_auth.c. > >>>> > >>>> 4. Serialize drm_file.master by introducing a new spinlock that's held whenever the value of drm_file.master changes. > >>>> > >>>> 5. Identify areas in drm_lease.c where pointers to struct drm_master are dereferenced, and ensure that the master pointers are not freed during use. > >>>> > >>>> v7 -> v8: > >>>> - Remove the patch that moves the call to _drm_lease_held out from the section locked by &dev->mode_config.idr_mutex in __drm_mode_object_find. This patch violated an existing lockdep requirement as reported by the intel-gfx CI. > >>>> - Added a new patch that moves a call to drm_is_current_master out from the RCU critical section in drm_clients_info. This was reported by the intel-gfx CI. > >>>> > >>>> v6 -> v7: > >>>> - Modify code alignment as suggested by the intel-gfx CI. > >>>> - Add a new patch to the series that adds a new lock to serialize drm_file.master, in response to the lockdep splat by the intel-gfx CI. > >>>> - Update drm_file_get_master to use the new drm_file.master_lock instead of drm_device.master_mutex, in response to the lockdep splat by the intel-gfx CI. > >>>> > >>>> v5 -> v6: > >>>> - Add a new patch to the series that moves the call to _drm_lease_held out from the section locked by &dev->mode_config.idr_mutex in __drm_mode_object_find. > >>>> - Clarify the kerneldoc for dereferencing drm_file.master, as suggested by Daniel Vetter. > >>>> - Refactor error paths with goto labels so that each function only has a single drm_master_put(), as suggested by Emil Velikov. > >>>> - Modify comparisons to NULL into "!master", as suggested by the intel-gfx CI. > >>>> > >>>> v4 -> v5: > >>>> - Add a new patch to the series that moves the call to drm_is_current_master in drm_mode_getconnector out from the section locked by &dev->mode_config.mutex. > >>>> - Additionally, added a missing semicolon to the patch, caught by the intel-gfx CI. > >>>> > >>>> v3 -> v4: > >>>> - Move the call to drm_is_current_master in drm_mode_getconnector out from the section locked by &dev->mode_config.mutex. As suggested by Daniel Vetter. This avoids a circular lock lock dependency as reported here https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/440406/ > >>>> - Inside drm_is_current_master, instead of grabbing &fpriv->master->dev->master_mutex, we grab &fpriv->minor->dev->master_mutex to avoid dereferencing a null ptr if fpriv->master is not set. > >>>> - Modify kerneldoc formatting for drm_file.master, as suggested by Daniel Vetter. > >>>> - Additionally, add a file_priv->master NULL check inside drm_file_get_master, and handle the NULL result accordingly in drm_lease.c. As suggested by Daniel Vetter. > >>>> > >>>> v2 -> v3: > >>>> - Move the definition of drm_is_current_master and the _locked version higher up in drm_auth.c to avoid needing a forward declaration of drm_is_current_master_locked. As suggested by Daniel Vetter. > >>>> - Instead of leaking drm_device.master_mutex into drm_lease.c to protect drm_master pointers, add a new drm_file_get_master() function that returns drm_file->master while increasing its reference count, to prevent drm_file->master from being freed. As suggested by Daniel Vetter. > >>>> > >>>> v1 -> v2: > >>>> - Move the lock and assignment before the DRM_DEBUG_LEASE in drm_mode_get_lease_ioctl, as suggested by Emil Velikov. > >>> > >>> Apologies for the delay, I missed your series. Maybe just ping next time > >>> around there's silence. > >>> > >>> Looks all great, merged to drm-misc-next. Given how complex this was I'm > >>> vary of just pushing this to -fixes without some solid testing. > >>> > >> > >> Hi Daniel, > >> > >> Thanks for merging, more testing definitely sounds good to me. > >> > >>> One thing I noticed is that drm_is_current_master could just use the > >>> spinlock, since it's only doing a read access. Care to type up that patch? > >>> > >> > >> I thought about this too, but I'm not sure if that's the best solution. > >> > >> drm_is_current_master calls drm_lease_owner which then walks up the tree > >> of master lessors. The spinlock protects the master of the current drm > >> file, but subsequent lessors aren't protected without holding the > >> device's master mutex. > > > > But this isn't a fpriv->master pointer, but a master->lessor pointer. > > Which should never ever be able to change (we'd have tons of uaf bugs > > around drm_lease_owner otherwise). So I don't think there's anything > > that dev->master_lock protects here that fpriv->master_lookup_lock > > doesn't protect already? > > > > Or am I missing something? > > > The comment in the struct drm_master says it's protected by > > mode_config.idr_mutex, but that only applies to the idrs and lists I > > think. > > > > Ah you're right, I also completely forgot that lessees hold a reference > to their lessor so nothing will be freed as long as the spinlock is > held. I'll prepare that patch then, thanks for pointing it out. btw since we now looked at all this in detail, can you perhaps do a patch to update the kerneldoc for all the lease fields in struct drm_master? I think moving them to the inline style and then adding comments for each field how locking/lifetime rules work would be really good. Since right now it's all fresh from for us. -Daniel > >>> Also, do you plan to look into that idea we've discussed to flush pending > >>> access when we revoke a master or a lease? I think that would be really > >>> nice improvement here. > >>> -Daniel > >>> > >> > >> Yup, now that the potential UAFs are addressed (hopefully), I'll take a > >> closer look and propose a patch for this. > > > > Thanks a lot. > > -Daniel > > > >> > >> Best wishes, > >> Desmond > >> > >>>> > >>>> Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi (5): > >>>> drm: avoid circular locks in drm_mode_getconnector > >>>> drm: avoid blocking in drm_clients_info's rcu section > >>>> drm: add a locked version of drm_is_current_master > >>>> drm: serialize drm_file.master with a new spinlock > >>>> drm: protect drm_master pointers in drm_lease.c > >>>> > >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c | 5 +- > >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c | 3 +- > >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c | 1 + > >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lease.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++------- > >>>> include/drm/drm_auth.h | 1 + > >>>> include/drm/drm_file.h | 18 +++++-- > >>>> 7 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-) > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> 2.25.1 > >>>> > >>> > >> > > > > > -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch

2 years, 9 months

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH v8 0/5] drm: address potential UAF bugs with drm_master ptrs

by Daniel Vetter

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 6:12 AM Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 21/7/21 2:24 am, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 12:35:03PM +0800, Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> In the previous thread on this series we decided to remove a patch that was violating a lockdep requirement in drm_lease. In addition to this change, I took a closer look at the CI logs for the Basic Acceptance Tests and noticed that another regression was introduced. The new patch 2 is a response to this. > >> > >> Overall, this series addresses potential use-after-free errors when dereferencing pointers to struct drm_master. These were identified after one such bug was caught by Syzbot in drm_getunique(): > >> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=148d2f1dfac64af52ffd27b661981a540724f8… > >> > >> The series is broken up into five patches: > >> > >> 1. Move a call to drm_is_current_master() out from a section locked by &dev->mode_config.mutex in drm_mode_getconnector(). This patch does not apply to stable. > >> > >> 2. Move a call to drm_is_current_master() out from the RCU read-side critical section in drm_clients_info(). > >> > >> 3. Implement a locked version of drm_is_current_master() function that's used within drm_auth.c. > >> > >> 4. Serialize drm_file.master by introducing a new spinlock that's held whenever the value of drm_file.master changes. > >> > >> 5. Identify areas in drm_lease.c where pointers to struct drm_master are dereferenced, and ensure that the master pointers are not freed during use. > >> > >> v7 -> v8: > >> - Remove the patch that moves the call to _drm_lease_held out from the section locked by &dev->mode_config.idr_mutex in __drm_mode_object_find. This patch violated an existing lockdep requirement as reported by the intel-gfx CI. > >> - Added a new patch that moves a call to drm_is_current_master out from the RCU critical section in drm_clients_info. This was reported by the intel-gfx CI. > >> > >> v6 -> v7: > >> - Modify code alignment as suggested by the intel-gfx CI. > >> - Add a new patch to the series that adds a new lock to serialize drm_file.master, in response to the lockdep splat by the intel-gfx CI. > >> - Update drm_file_get_master to use the new drm_file.master_lock instead of drm_device.master_mutex, in response to the lockdep splat by the intel-gfx CI. > >> > >> v5 -> v6: > >> - Add a new patch to the series that moves the call to _drm_lease_held out from the section locked by &dev->mode_config.idr_mutex in __drm_mode_object_find. > >> - Clarify the kerneldoc for dereferencing drm_file.master, as suggested by Daniel Vetter. > >> - Refactor error paths with goto labels so that each function only has a single drm_master_put(), as suggested by Emil Velikov. > >> - Modify comparisons to NULL into "!master", as suggested by the intel-gfx CI. > >> > >> v4 -> v5: > >> - Add a new patch to the series that moves the call to drm_is_current_master in drm_mode_getconnector out from the section locked by &dev->mode_config.mutex. > >> - Additionally, added a missing semicolon to the patch, caught by the intel-gfx CI. > >> > >> v3 -> v4: > >> - Move the call to drm_is_current_master in drm_mode_getconnector out from the section locked by &dev->mode_config.mutex. As suggested by Daniel Vetter. This avoids a circular lock lock dependency as reported here https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/440406/ > >> - Inside drm_is_current_master, instead of grabbing &fpriv->master->dev->master_mutex, we grab &fpriv->minor->dev->master_mutex to avoid dereferencing a null ptr if fpriv->master is not set. > >> - Modify kerneldoc formatting for drm_file.master, as suggested by Daniel Vetter. > >> - Additionally, add a file_priv->master NULL check inside drm_file_get_master, and handle the NULL result accordingly in drm_lease.c. As suggested by Daniel Vetter. > >> > >> v2 -> v3: > >> - Move the definition of drm_is_current_master and the _locked version higher up in drm_auth.c to avoid needing a forward declaration of drm_is_current_master_locked. As suggested by Daniel Vetter. > >> - Instead of leaking drm_device.master_mutex into drm_lease.c to protect drm_master pointers, add a new drm_file_get_master() function that returns drm_file->master while increasing its reference count, to prevent drm_file->master from being freed. As suggested by Daniel Vetter. > >> > >> v1 -> v2: > >> - Move the lock and assignment before the DRM_DEBUG_LEASE in drm_mode_get_lease_ioctl, as suggested by Emil Velikov. > > > > Apologies for the delay, I missed your series. Maybe just ping next time > > around there's silence. > > > > Looks all great, merged to drm-misc-next. Given how complex this was I'm > > vary of just pushing this to -fixes without some solid testing. > > > > Hi Daniel, > > Thanks for merging, more testing definitely sounds good to me. > > > One thing I noticed is that drm_is_current_master could just use the > > spinlock, since it's only doing a read access. Care to type up that patch? > > > > I thought about this too, but I'm not sure if that's the best solution. > > drm_is_current_master calls drm_lease_owner which then walks up the tree > of master lessors. The spinlock protects the master of the current drm > file, but subsequent lessors aren't protected without holding the > device's master mutex. But this isn't a fpriv->master pointer, but a master->lessor pointer. Which should never ever be able to change (we'd have tons of uaf bugs around drm_lease_owner otherwise). So I don't think there's anything that dev->master_lock protects here that fpriv->master_lookup_lock doesn't protect already? Or am I missing something? The comment in the struct drm_master says it's protected by mode_config.idr_mutex, but that only applies to the idrs and lists I think. > > Also, do you plan to look into that idea we've discussed to flush pending > > access when we revoke a master or a lease? I think that would be really > > nice improvement here. > > -Daniel > > > > Yup, now that the potential UAFs are addressed (hopefully), I'll take a > closer look and propose a patch for this. Thanks a lot. -Daniel > > Best wishes, > Desmond > > >> > >> Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi (5): > >> drm: avoid circular locks in drm_mode_getconnector > >> drm: avoid blocking in drm_clients_info's rcu section > >> drm: add a locked version of drm_is_current_master > >> drm: serialize drm_file.master with a new spinlock > >> drm: protect drm_master pointers in drm_lease.c > >> > >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c | 5 +- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c | 3 +- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c | 1 + > >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lease.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++------- > >> include/drm/drm_auth.h | 1 + > >> include/drm/drm_file.h | 18 +++++-- > >> 7 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-) > >> > >> -- > >> 2.25.1 > >> > > > -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch

2 years, 9 months

[PATCH v2] dma-buf: Delete the DMA-BUF attachment sysfs statistics

by Hridya Valsaraju

The DMA-BUF attachment statistics form a subset of the DMA-BUF sysfs statistics that recently merged to the drm-misc tree. They are not UABI yet since they have not merged to the upstream Linux kernel. Since there has been a reported a performance regression due to the overhead of sysfs directory creation/teardown during dma_buf_attach()/dma_buf_detach(), this patch deletes the DMA-BUF attachment statistics from sysfs. Fixes: bdb8d06dfefd (dmabuf: Add the capability to expose DMA-BUF stats in sysfs) Signed-off-by: Hridya Valsaraju <hridya(a)google.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig(a)amd.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- Changes in v2: Updated commit message to clarify that the sysfs files being removed have not yet merged to upstream Linux and are hence not ABI. Hi Christian, I have updated the commit message as per your suggestion. Please do take another look when you get a chance. Thanks, Hridya .../ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-dmabuf-buffers | 28 ---- drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf-sysfs-stats.c | 140 +----------------- drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf-sysfs-stats.h | 27 ---- drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 16 -- include/linux/dma-buf.h | 17 --- 5 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 224 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-dmabuf-buffers b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-dmabuf-buffers index a243984ed420..5d3bc997dc64 100644 --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-dmabuf-buffers +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-dmabuf-buffers @@ -22,31 +22,3 @@ KernelVersion: v5.13 Contact: Hridya Valsaraju <hridya(a)google.com> Description: This file is read-only and specifies the size of the DMA-BUF in bytes. - -What: /sys/kernel/dmabuf/buffers/<inode_number>/attachments -Date: May 2021 -KernelVersion: v5.13 -Contact: Hridya Valsaraju <hridya(a)google.com> -Description: This directory will contain subdirectories representing every - attachment of the DMA-BUF. - -What: /sys/kernel/dmabuf/buffers/<inode_number>/attachments/<attachment_uid> -Date: May 2021 -KernelVersion: v5.13 -Contact: Hridya Valsaraju <hridya(a)google.com> -Description: This directory will contain information on the attached device - and the number of current distinct device mappings. - -What: /sys/kernel/dmabuf/buffers/<inode_number>/attachments/<attachment_uid>/device -Date: May 2021 -KernelVersion: v5.13 -Contact: Hridya Valsaraju <hridya(a)google.com> -Description: This file is read-only and is a symlink to the attached device's - sysfs entry. - -What: /sys/kernel/dmabuf/buffers/<inode_number>/attachments/<attachment_uid>/map_counter -Date: May 2021 -KernelVersion: v5.13 -Contact: Hridya Valsaraju <hridya(a)google.com> -Description: This file is read-only and contains a map_counter indicating the - number of distinct device mappings of the attachment. diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf-sysfs-stats.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf-sysfs-stats.c index a2638e84199c..053baadcada9 100644 --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf-sysfs-stats.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf-sysfs-stats.c @@ -40,14 +40,11 @@ * * * ``/sys/kernel/dmabuf/buffers/<inode_number>/exporter_name`` * * ``/sys/kernel/dmabuf/buffers/<inode_number>/size`` - * * ``/sys/kernel/dmabuf/buffers/<inode_number>/attachments/<attach_uid>/device`` - * * ``/sys/kernel/dmabuf/buffers/<inode_number>/attachments/<attach_uid>/map_counter`` * - * The information in the interface can also be used to derive per-exporter and - * per-device usage statistics. The data from the interface can be gathered - * on error conditions or other important events to provide a snapshot of - * DMA-BUF usage. It can also be collected periodically by telemetry to monitor - * various metrics. + * The information in the interface can also be used to derive per-exporter + * statistics. The data from the interface can be gathered on error conditions + * or other important events to provide a snapshot of DMA-BUF usage. + * It can also be collected periodically by telemetry to monitor various metrics. * * Detailed documentation about the interface is present in * Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-dmabuf-buffers. @@ -121,120 +118,6 @@ static struct kobj_type dma_buf_ktype = { .default_groups = dma_buf_stats_default_groups, }; -#define to_dma_buf_attach_entry_from_kobj(x) container_of(x, struct dma_buf_attach_sysfs_entry, kobj) - -struct dma_buf_attach_stats_attribute { - struct attribute attr; - ssize_t (*show)(struct dma_buf_attach_sysfs_entry *sysfs_entry, - struct dma_buf_attach_stats_attribute *attr, char *buf); -}; -#define to_dma_buf_attach_stats_attr(x) container_of(x, struct dma_buf_attach_stats_attribute, attr) - -static ssize_t dma_buf_attach_stats_attribute_show(struct kobject *kobj, - struct attribute *attr, - char *buf) -{ - struct dma_buf_attach_stats_attribute *attribute; - struct dma_buf_attach_sysfs_entry *sysfs_entry; - - attribute = to_dma_buf_attach_stats_attr(attr); - sysfs_entry = to_dma_buf_attach_entry_from_kobj(kobj); - - if (!attribute->show) - return -EIO; - - return attribute->show(sysfs_entry, attribute, buf); -} - -static const struct sysfs_ops dma_buf_attach_stats_sysfs_ops = { - .show = dma_buf_attach_stats_attribute_show, -}; - -static ssize_t map_counter_show(struct dma_buf_attach_sysfs_entry *sysfs_entry, - struct dma_buf_attach_stats_attribute *attr, - char *buf) -{ - return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", sysfs_entry->map_counter); -} - -static struct dma_buf_attach_stats_attribute map_counter_attribute = - __ATTR_RO(map_counter); - -static struct attribute *dma_buf_attach_stats_default_attrs[] = { - &map_counter_attribute.attr, - NULL, -}; -ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(dma_buf_attach_stats_default); - -static void dma_buf_attach_sysfs_release(struct kobject *kobj) -{ - struct dma_buf_attach_sysfs_entry *sysfs_entry; - - sysfs_entry = to_dma_buf_attach_entry_from_kobj(kobj); - kfree(sysfs_entry); -} - -static struct kobj_type dma_buf_attach_ktype = { - .sysfs_ops = &dma_buf_attach_stats_sysfs_ops, - .release = dma_buf_attach_sysfs_release, - .default_groups = dma_buf_attach_stats_default_groups, -}; - -void dma_buf_attach_stats_teardown(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach) -{ - struct dma_buf_attach_sysfs_entry *sysfs_entry; - - sysfs_entry = attach->sysfs_entry; - if (!sysfs_entry) - return; - - sysfs_delete_link(&sysfs_entry->kobj, &attach->dev->kobj, "device"); - - kobject_del(&sysfs_entry->kobj); - kobject_put(&sysfs_entry->kobj); -} - -int dma_buf_attach_stats_setup(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach, - unsigned int uid) -{ - struct dma_buf_attach_sysfs_entry *sysfs_entry; - int ret; - struct dma_buf *dmabuf; - - if (!attach) - return -EINVAL; - - dmabuf = attach->dmabuf; - - sysfs_entry = kzalloc(sizeof(struct dma_buf_attach_sysfs_entry), - GFP_KERNEL); - if (!sysfs_entry) - return -ENOMEM; - - sysfs_entry->kobj.kset = dmabuf->sysfs_entry->attach_stats_kset; - - attach->sysfs_entry = sysfs_entry; - - ret = kobject_init_and_add(&sysfs_entry->kobj, &dma_buf_attach_ktype, - NULL, "%u", uid); - if (ret) - goto kobj_err; - - ret = sysfs_create_link(&sysfs_entry->kobj, &attach->dev->kobj, - "device"); - if (ret) - goto link_err; - - return 0; - -link_err: - kobject_del(&sysfs_entry->kobj); -kobj_err: - kobject_put(&sysfs_entry->kobj); - attach->sysfs_entry = NULL; - - return ret; -} void dma_buf_stats_teardown(struct dma_buf *dmabuf) { struct dma_buf_sysfs_entry *sysfs_entry; @@ -243,7 +126,6 @@ void dma_buf_stats_teardown(struct dma_buf *dmabuf) if (!sysfs_entry) return; - kset_unregister(sysfs_entry->attach_stats_kset); kobject_del(&sysfs_entry->kobj); kobject_put(&sysfs_entry->kobj); } @@ -290,7 +172,6 @@ int dma_buf_stats_setup(struct dma_buf *dmabuf) { struct dma_buf_sysfs_entry *sysfs_entry; int ret; - struct kset *attach_stats_kset; if (!dmabuf || !dmabuf->file) return -EINVAL; @@ -315,21 +196,8 @@ int dma_buf_stats_setup(struct dma_buf *dmabuf) if (ret) goto err_sysfs_dmabuf; - /* create the directory for attachment stats */ - attach_stats_kset = kset_create_and_add("attachments", - &dmabuf_sysfs_no_uevent_ops, - &sysfs_entry->kobj); - if (!attach_stats_kset) { - ret = -ENOMEM; - goto err_sysfs_attach; - } - - sysfs_entry->attach_stats_kset = attach_stats_kset; - return 0; -err_sysfs_attach: - kobject_del(&sysfs_entry->kobj); err_sysfs_dmabuf: kobject_put(&sysfs_entry->kobj); dmabuf->sysfs_entry = NULL; diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf-sysfs-stats.h b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf-sysfs-stats.h index 5f4703249117..a49c6e2650cc 100644 --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf-sysfs-stats.h +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf-sysfs-stats.h @@ -14,23 +14,8 @@ int dma_buf_init_sysfs_statistics(void); void dma_buf_uninit_sysfs_statistics(void); int dma_buf_stats_setup(struct dma_buf *dmabuf); -int dma_buf_attach_stats_setup(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach, - unsigned int uid); -static inline void dma_buf_update_attachment_map_count(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach, - int delta) -{ - struct dma_buf_attach_sysfs_entry *entry = attach->sysfs_entry; - entry->map_counter += delta; -} void dma_buf_stats_teardown(struct dma_buf *dmabuf); -void dma_buf_attach_stats_teardown(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach); -static inline unsigned int dma_buf_update_attach_uid(struct dma_buf *dmabuf) -{ - struct dma_buf_sysfs_entry *entry = dmabuf->sysfs_entry; - - return entry->attachment_uid++; -} #else static inline int dma_buf_init_sysfs_statistics(void) @@ -44,19 +29,7 @@ static inline int dma_buf_stats_setup(struct dma_buf *dmabuf) { return 0; } -static inline int dma_buf_attach_stats_setup(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach, - unsigned int uid) -{ - return 0; -} static inline void dma_buf_stats_teardown(struct dma_buf *dmabuf) {} -static inline void dma_buf_attach_stats_teardown(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach) {} -static inline void dma_buf_update_attachment_map_count(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach, - int delta) {} -static inline unsigned int dma_buf_update_attach_uid(struct dma_buf *dmabuf) -{ - return 0; -} #endif #endif // _DMA_BUF_SYSFS_STATS_H diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c index 510b42771974..b1a6db71c656 100644 --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c @@ -738,7 +738,6 @@ dma_buf_dynamic_attach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct device *dev, { struct dma_buf_attachment *attach; int ret; - unsigned int attach_uid; if (WARN_ON(!dmabuf || !dev)) return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); @@ -764,13 +763,8 @@ dma_buf_dynamic_attach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct device *dev, } dma_resv_lock(dmabuf->resv, NULL); list_add(&attach->node, &dmabuf->attachments); - attach_uid = dma_buf_update_attach_uid(dmabuf); dma_resv_unlock(dmabuf->resv); - ret = dma_buf_attach_stats_setup(attach, attach_uid); - if (ret) - goto err_sysfs; - /* When either the importer or the exporter can't handle dynamic * mappings we cache the mapping here to avoid issues with the * reservation object lock. @@ -797,7 +791,6 @@ dma_buf_dynamic_attach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct device *dev, dma_resv_unlock(attach->dmabuf->resv); attach->sgt = sgt; attach->dir = DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL; - dma_buf_update_attachment_map_count(attach, 1 /* delta */); } return attach; @@ -814,7 +807,6 @@ dma_buf_dynamic_attach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct device *dev, if (dma_buf_is_dynamic(attach->dmabuf)) dma_resv_unlock(attach->dmabuf->resv); -err_sysfs: dma_buf_detach(dmabuf, attach); return ERR_PTR(ret); } @@ -864,7 +856,6 @@ void dma_buf_detach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct dma_buf_attachment *attach) dma_resv_lock(attach->dmabuf->resv, NULL); __unmap_dma_buf(attach, attach->sgt, attach->dir); - dma_buf_update_attachment_map_count(attach, -1 /* delta */); if (dma_buf_is_dynamic(attach->dmabuf)) { dmabuf->ops->unpin(attach); @@ -878,7 +869,6 @@ void dma_buf_detach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct dma_buf_attachment *attach) if (dmabuf->ops->detach) dmabuf->ops->detach(dmabuf, attach); - dma_buf_attach_stats_teardown(attach); kfree(attach); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_detach); @@ -1020,10 +1010,6 @@ struct sg_table *dma_buf_map_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach, } } #endif /* CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG */ - - if (!IS_ERR(sg_table)) - dma_buf_update_attachment_map_count(attach, 1 /* delta */); - return sg_table; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_map_attachment); @@ -1061,8 +1047,6 @@ void dma_buf_unmap_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach, if (dma_buf_is_dynamic(attach->dmabuf) && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMABUF_MOVE_NOTIFY)) dma_buf_unpin(attach); - - dma_buf_update_attachment_map_count(attach, -1 /* delta */); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_unmap_attachment); diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/linux/dma-buf.h index 2b814fde0d11..678b2006be78 100644 --- a/include/linux/dma-buf.h +++ b/include/linux/dma-buf.h @@ -444,15 +444,6 @@ struct dma_buf { struct dma_buf_sysfs_entry { struct kobject kobj; struct dma_buf *dmabuf; - - /** - * @sysfs_entry.attachment_uid: - * - * This is protected by the dma_resv_lock() on @resv and is - * incremented on each attach. - */ - unsigned int attachment_uid; - struct kset *attach_stats_kset; } *sysfs_entry; #endif }; @@ -504,7 +495,6 @@ struct dma_buf_attach_ops { * @importer_ops: importer operations for this attachment, if provided * dma_buf_map/unmap_attachment() must be called with the dma_resv lock held. * @importer_priv: importer specific attachment data. - * @sysfs_entry: For exposing information about this attachment in sysfs. * * This structure holds the attachment information between the dma_buf buffer * and its user device(s). The list contains one attachment struct per device @@ -525,13 +515,6 @@ struct dma_buf_attachment { const struct dma_buf_attach_ops *importer_ops; void *importer_priv; void *priv; -#ifdef CONFIG_DMABUF_SYSFS_STATS - /* for sysfs stats */ - struct dma_buf_attach_sysfs_entry { - struct kobject kobj; - unsigned int map_counter; - } *sysfs_entry; -#endif }; /** -- 2.32.0.93.g670b81a890-goog

2 years, 9 months

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH v8 0/5] drm: address potential UAF bugs with drm_master ptrs

by Daniel Vetter

On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 12:35:03PM +0800, Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi wrote: > Hi, > > In the previous thread on this series we decided to remove a patch that was violating a lockdep requirement in drm_lease. In addition to this change, I took a closer look at the CI logs for the Basic Acceptance Tests and noticed that another regression was introduced. The new patch 2 is a response to this. > > Overall, this series addresses potential use-after-free errors when dereferencing pointers to struct drm_master. These were identified after one such bug was caught by Syzbot in drm_getunique(): > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=148d2f1dfac64af52ffd27b661981a540724f8… > > The series is broken up into five patches: > > 1. Move a call to drm_is_current_master() out from a section locked by &dev->mode_config.mutex in drm_mode_getconnector(). This patch does not apply to stable. > > 2. Move a call to drm_is_current_master() out from the RCU read-side critical section in drm_clients_info(). > > 3. Implement a locked version of drm_is_current_master() function that's used within drm_auth.c. > > 4. Serialize drm_file.master by introducing a new spinlock that's held whenever the value of drm_file.master changes. > > 5. Identify areas in drm_lease.c where pointers to struct drm_master are dereferenced, and ensure that the master pointers are not freed during use. > > v7 -> v8: > - Remove the patch that moves the call to _drm_lease_held out from the section locked by &dev->mode_config.idr_mutex in __drm_mode_object_find. This patch violated an existing lockdep requirement as reported by the intel-gfx CI. > - Added a new patch that moves a call to drm_is_current_master out from the RCU critical section in drm_clients_info. This was reported by the intel-gfx CI. > > v6 -> v7: > - Modify code alignment as suggested by the intel-gfx CI. > - Add a new patch to the series that adds a new lock to serialize drm_file.master, in response to the lockdep splat by the intel-gfx CI. > - Update drm_file_get_master to use the new drm_file.master_lock instead of drm_device.master_mutex, in response to the lockdep splat by the intel-gfx CI. > > v5 -> v6: > - Add a new patch to the series that moves the call to _drm_lease_held out from the section locked by &dev->mode_config.idr_mutex in __drm_mode_object_find. > - Clarify the kerneldoc for dereferencing drm_file.master, as suggested by Daniel Vetter. > - Refactor error paths with goto labels so that each function only has a single drm_master_put(), as suggested by Emil Velikov. > - Modify comparisons to NULL into "!master", as suggested by the intel-gfx CI. > > v4 -> v5: > - Add a new patch to the series that moves the call to drm_is_current_master in drm_mode_getconnector out from the section locked by &dev->mode_config.mutex. > - Additionally, added a missing semicolon to the patch, caught by the intel-gfx CI. > > v3 -> v4: > - Move the call to drm_is_current_master in drm_mode_getconnector out from the section locked by &dev->mode_config.mutex. As suggested by Daniel Vetter. This avoids a circular lock lock dependency as reported here https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/440406/ > - Inside drm_is_current_master, instead of grabbing &fpriv->master->dev->master_mutex, we grab &fpriv->minor->dev->master_mutex to avoid dereferencing a null ptr if fpriv->master is not set. > - Modify kerneldoc formatting for drm_file.master, as suggested by Daniel Vetter. > - Additionally, add a file_priv->master NULL check inside drm_file_get_master, and handle the NULL result accordingly in drm_lease.c. As suggested by Daniel Vetter. > > v2 -> v3: > - Move the definition of drm_is_current_master and the _locked version higher up in drm_auth.c to avoid needing a forward declaration of drm_is_current_master_locked. As suggested by Daniel Vetter. > - Instead of leaking drm_device.master_mutex into drm_lease.c to protect drm_master pointers, add a new drm_file_get_master() function that returns drm_file->master while increasing its reference count, to prevent drm_file->master from being freed. As suggested by Daniel Vetter. > > v1 -> v2: > - Move the lock and assignment before the DRM_DEBUG_LEASE in drm_mode_get_lease_ioctl, as suggested by Emil Velikov. Apologies for the delay, I missed your series. Maybe just ping next time around there's silence. Looks all great, merged to drm-misc-next. Given how complex this was I'm vary of just pushing this to -fixes without some solid testing. One thing I noticed is that drm_is_current_master could just use the spinlock, since it's only doing a read access. Care to type up that patch? Also, do you plan to look into that idea we've discussed to flush pending access when we revoke a master or a lease? I think that would be really nice improvement here. -Daniel > > Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi (5): > drm: avoid circular locks in drm_mode_getconnector > drm: avoid blocking in drm_clients_info's rcu section > drm: add a locked version of drm_is_current_master > drm: serialize drm_file.master with a new spinlock > drm: protect drm_master pointers in drm_lease.c > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c | 5 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c | 3 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_file.c | 1 + > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lease.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++------- > include/drm/drm_auth.h | 1 + > include/drm/drm_file.h | 18 +++++-- > 7 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.25.1 > -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch

2 years, 9 months

[PATCH 00/11] drm/msm: drm scheduler conversion and cleanups

by Rob Clark

From: Rob Clark <robdclark(a)chromium.org> Conversion to gpu_scheduler, and bonus removal of drm_gem_object_put_locked() Rob Clark (11): drm/msm: Docs and misc cleanup drm/msm: Small submitqueue creation cleanup drm/msm: drop drm_gem_object_put_locked() drm: Drop drm_gem_object_put_locked() drm/msm/submit: Simplify out-fence-fd handling drm/msm: Consolidate submit bo state drm/msm: Track "seqno" fences by idr drm/msm: Return ERR_PTR() from submit_create() drm/msm: Conversion to drm scheduler drm/msm: Drop struct_mutex in submit path drm/msm: Utilize gpu scheduler priorities drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 22 -- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_debugfs.c | 4 +- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_gpu.c | 6 +- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_power.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a5xx_preempt.c | 7 +- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c | 12 +- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu_state.c | 4 +- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c | 6 +- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c | 30 +- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fence.c | 39 --- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fence.h | 2 - drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c | 91 +----- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.h | 37 ++- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c | 300 ++++++++++++-------- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c | 50 +--- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.h | 41 ++- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_ringbuffer.c | 70 ++++- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_ringbuffer.h | 12 + drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_submitqueue.c | 49 +++- include/drm/drm_gem.h | 2 - include/uapi/drm/msm_drm.h | 10 +- 23 files changed, 440 insertions(+), 359 deletions(-) -- 2.31.1

2 years, 9 months

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH v2] dma_buf: remove dmabuf sysfs teardown before release

by Christian König

Am 20.07.21 um 12:31 schrieb guangming.cao(a)mediatek.com: > From: Guangming Cao <Guangming.Cao(a)mediatek.com> > > Dmabuf sysfs stat is used for dmabuf info track. > But these file maybe still in use after buffer released, > should clear it before buffer release. > > Signed-off-by: Guangming Cao <Guangming.Cao(a)mediatek.com> Reviewed and pushed to drm-misc-next. Thanks, Christian. > --- > drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c > index b1a6db71c656..63d32261b63f 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c > +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c > @@ -76,12 +76,12 @@ static void dma_buf_release(struct dentry *dentry) > */ > BUG_ON(dmabuf->cb_shared.active || dmabuf->cb_excl.active); > > + dma_buf_stats_teardown(dmabuf); > dmabuf->ops->release(dmabuf); > > if (dmabuf->resv == (struct dma_resv *)&dmabuf[1]) > dma_resv_fini(dmabuf->resv); > > - dma_buf_stats_teardown(dmabuf); > module_put(dmabuf->owner); > kfree(dmabuf->name); > kfree(dmabuf);

2 years, 9 months

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

Linaro-mm-sig July 2021