Linaro-mm-sig May 2026

linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org

79 participants
69 discussions

Re: [RFC PATCH 04/12] vfio/pci: Allow MMIO regions to be exported through dma-buf

by Alexey Kardashevskiy

Hi! Let's reignite this topic. I've been using these patches + QEMU side hacks for 6+ months. And it's been fine until I got a device where MSIX BAR is in a middle of another BAR marked as TEE in the TDISP interface report. And no trusted MSIX yet. Every time QEMU mmaps a BAR - I request a dmabuf fd from VFIO in QEMU. Since mapping of an entire MSIX BAR is allowed by default, VFIORegion::nr_mmaps==1 and it is an entire BAR. Problem: KVM memslot mismatches the dmabuf fd size How: QEMU emulates MSIX table and PBA by adding emulated MemoryRegions on top of the mapped BARs. In the QEMU memory flatview this splits the BAR into 2 or 3 sections (2 if MSIX at the start/end, 3 if in a middle). QEMU tries registering 1 or 2 KVM memory slots for regions outside of MSIX which fails in kvm_vfio_dmabuf_bind() as regions are smaller than the exported dmabuf fd (which is the entire BAR == 32KB). Solution1: use QEMU x-msix-relocation hack to move MSIX elsewhere - end of some BAR (doubles the bar size so problematic for huge BARs like 512GB+), or another BAR (there may be no available as 3 of 64bit BARs is the limit). Solution2: modify logic in VFIO dmabuf to allow multiple KVM memory slots per dmabuf. Now it is kvm_memory_slot::dmabuf_attach with no offset into the dmabuf and one kvm_vfio_dmabuf per dma_buf. Solution3: hack QEMU into smashing a MSIX-containing BAR in vfio_pci_fixup_msix_region. Here is what it does: 0000380004000000-0000380004002fff (prio 0, ramd): 0000:41:04.0 BAR 4 mmaps[0] KVM 0000380004003000-0000380004006fff (prio 0, i/o): msix-table 0000380004007000-0000380004007fff (prio 0, ramd): 0000:41:04.0 BAR 4 mmaps[1] KVM The problem now is that the TDI report must have the same split of the BAR as the VM is going to validate TEE (==trusted) MMIO ranges and this has to match the QEMU view. Harder than it sounds as the size of MSIX table in bytes is not exactly specified anywhere except the report. Solution4: the above + modify QEMU to check the TDI report for not reporting MSIX+PBA where QEMU emulates them. The problem is that when QEMU adds emulated MRs - there is no report yet (the report is created later on, some TDISP witchery). So when the device is accepted - QEMU could reinitialize those emulated msix and pba MRs to match the report exactly so the flatview generates correct KVM memory regions and then KVM can work with dmabuf fine. Any thoughts? what is acceptable for everybody? Thanks, On 8/1/25 01:27, Xu Yilun wrote: > From: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy(a)intel.com> > > This is a reduced version of Vivek's series [1]. Removed the > dma_buf_ops.attach/map/unmap_dma_buf/mmap() as they are not necessary > in this series, also because of the WIP p2p dma mapping opens [2]. Just > focus on the private MMIO get PFN function in this early stage. > >>From Jason Gunthorpe: > "dma-buf has become a way to safely acquire a handle to non-struct page > memory that can still have lifetime controlled by the exporter. Notably > RDMA can now import dma-buf FDs and build them into MRs which allows for > PCI P2P operations. Extend this to allow vfio-pci to export MMIO memory > from PCI device BARs. > > The patch design loosely follows the pattern in commit > db1a8dd916aa ("habanalabs: add support for dma-buf exporter") except this > does not support pinning. > > Instead, this implements what, in the past, we've called a revocable > attachment using move. In normal situations the attachment is pinned, as a > BAR does not change physical address. However when the VFIO device is > closed, or a PCI reset is issued, access to the MMIO memory is revoked. > > Revoked means that move occurs, but an attempt to immediately re-map the > memory will fail. In the reset case a future move will be triggered when > MMIO access returns. As both close and reset are under userspace control > it is expected that userspace will suspend use of the dma-buf before doing > these operations, the revoke is purely for kernel self-defense against a > hostile userspace." > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20240624065552.1572580-4-vivek.kasireddy@intel.… > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/IA0PR11MB7185FDD56CFDD0A2B8D21468F83B2@IA0PR11M… > > Original-patch-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg(a)nvidia.com> > Signed-off-by: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy(a)intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu(a)linux.intel.com> > --- > drivers/vfio/pci/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/vfio/pci/dma_buf.c | 223 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c | 22 ++- > drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c | 20 ++- > drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_priv.h | 25 ++++ > include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h | 1 + > include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 29 ++++ > 7 files changed, 316 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/vfio/pci/dma_buf.c > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/Makefile b/drivers/vfio/pci/Makefile > index cf00c0a7e55c..0cfdc9ede82f 100644 > --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/Makefile > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ > > vfio-pci-core-y := vfio_pci_core.o vfio_pci_intrs.o vfio_pci_rdwr.o vfio_pci_config.o > vfio-pci-core-$(CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_ZDEV_KVM) += vfio_pci_zdev.o > +vfio-pci-core-$(CONFIG_DMA_SHARED_BUFFER) += dma_buf.o > obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_CORE) += vfio-pci-core.o > > vfio-pci-y := vfio_pci.o > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/dma_buf.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/dma_buf.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..1d5f46744922 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/dma_buf.c > @@ -0,0 +1,223 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only > +/* Copyright (c) 2024, NVIDIA CORPORATION & AFFILIATES. > + */ > +#include <linux/dma-buf.h> > +#include <linux/dma-resv.h> > + > +#include "vfio_pci_priv.h" > + > +MODULE_IMPORT_NS("DMA_BUF"); > + > +struct vfio_pci_dma_buf { > + struct dma_buf *dmabuf; > + struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev; > + struct list_head dmabufs_elm; > + unsigned int nr_ranges; > + struct vfio_region_dma_range *dma_ranges; > + bool revoked; > +}; > + > +static void vfio_pci_dma_buf_unpin(struct dma_buf_attachment *attachment) > +{ > +} > + > +static int vfio_pci_dma_buf_pin(struct dma_buf_attachment *attachment) > +{ > + /* > + * Uses the dynamic interface but must always allow for > + * dma_buf_move_notify() to do revoke > + */ > + return -EINVAL; > +} > + > +static int vfio_pci_dma_buf_get_pfn(struct dma_buf_attachment *attachment, > + pgoff_t pgoff, u64 *pfn, int *max_order) > +{ > + /* TODO */ > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > +} > + > +static void vfio_pci_dma_buf_release(struct dma_buf *dmabuf) > +{ > + struct vfio_pci_dma_buf *priv = dmabuf->priv; > + > + /* > + * Either this or vfio_pci_dma_buf_cleanup() will remove from the list. > + * The refcount prevents both. > + */ > + if (priv->vdev) { > + down_write(&priv->vdev->memory_lock); > + list_del_init(&priv->dmabufs_elm); > + up_write(&priv->vdev->memory_lock); > + vfio_device_put_registration(&priv->vdev->vdev); > + } > + kfree(priv); > +} > + > +static const struct dma_buf_ops vfio_pci_dmabuf_ops = { > + .pin = vfio_pci_dma_buf_pin, > + .unpin = vfio_pci_dma_buf_unpin, > + .get_pfn = vfio_pci_dma_buf_get_pfn, > + .release = vfio_pci_dma_buf_release, > +}; > + > +static int check_dma_ranges(struct vfio_pci_dma_buf *priv, u64 *dmabuf_size) > +{ > + struct vfio_region_dma_range *dma_ranges = priv->dma_ranges; > + struct pci_dev *pdev = priv->vdev->pdev; > + resource_size_t bar_size; > + int i; > + > + for (i = 0; i < priv->nr_ranges; i++) { > + /* > + * For PCI the region_index is the BAR number like > + * everything else. > + */ > + if (dma_ranges[i].region_index >= VFIO_PCI_ROM_REGION_INDEX) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + bar_size = pci_resource_len(pdev, dma_ranges[i].region_index); > + if (!bar_size) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + if (!dma_ranges[i].offset && !dma_ranges[i].length) > + dma_ranges[i].length = bar_size; > + > + if (!IS_ALIGNED(dma_ranges[i].offset, PAGE_SIZE) || > + !IS_ALIGNED(dma_ranges[i].length, PAGE_SIZE) || > + dma_ranges[i].length > bar_size || > + dma_ranges[i].offset >= bar_size || > + dma_ranges[i].offset + dma_ranges[i].length > bar_size) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + *dmabuf_size += dma_ranges[i].length; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +int vfio_pci_core_feature_dma_buf(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, u32 flags, > + struct vfio_device_feature_dma_buf __user *arg, > + size_t argsz) > +{ > + struct vfio_device_feature_dma_buf get_dma_buf; > + struct vfio_region_dma_range *dma_ranges; > + DEFINE_DMA_BUF_EXPORT_INFO(exp_info); > + struct vfio_pci_dma_buf *priv; > + u64 dmabuf_size = 0; > + int ret; > + > + ret = vfio_check_feature(flags, argsz, VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_GET, > + sizeof(get_dma_buf)); > + if (ret != 1) > + return ret; > + > + if (copy_from_user(&get_dma_buf, arg, sizeof(get_dma_buf))) > + return -EFAULT; > + > + dma_ranges = memdup_array_user(&arg->dma_ranges, > + get_dma_buf.nr_ranges, > + sizeof(*dma_ranges)); > + if (IS_ERR(dma_ranges)) > + return PTR_ERR(dma_ranges); > + > + priv = kzalloc(sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!priv) { > + kfree(dma_ranges); > + return -ENOMEM; > + } > + > + priv->vdev = vdev; > + priv->nr_ranges = get_dma_buf.nr_ranges; > + priv->dma_ranges = dma_ranges; > + > + ret = check_dma_ranges(priv, &dmabuf_size); > + if (ret) > + goto err_free_priv; > + > + if (!vfio_device_try_get_registration(&vdev->vdev)) { > + ret = -ENODEV; > + goto err_free_priv; > + } > + > + exp_info.ops = &vfio_pci_dmabuf_ops; > + exp_info.size = dmabuf_size; > + exp_info.flags = get_dma_buf.open_flags; > + exp_info.priv = priv; > + > + priv->dmabuf = dma_buf_export(&exp_info); > + if (IS_ERR(priv->dmabuf)) { > + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->dmabuf); > + goto err_dev_put; > + } > + > + /* dma_buf_put() now frees priv */ > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->dmabufs_elm); > + down_write(&vdev->memory_lock); > + dma_resv_lock(priv->dmabuf->resv, NULL); > + priv->revoked = !__vfio_pci_memory_enabled(vdev); > + list_add_tail(&priv->dmabufs_elm, &vdev->dmabufs); > + dma_resv_unlock(priv->dmabuf->resv); > + up_write(&vdev->memory_lock); > + > + /* > + * dma_buf_fd() consumes the reference, when the file closes the dmabuf > + * will be released. > + */ > + return dma_buf_fd(priv->dmabuf, get_dma_buf.open_flags); > + > +err_dev_put: > + vfio_device_put_registration(&vdev->vdev); > +err_free_priv: > + kfree(dma_ranges); > + kfree(priv); > + return ret; > +} > + > +void vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, bool revoked) > +{ > + struct vfio_pci_dma_buf *priv; > + struct vfio_pci_dma_buf *tmp; > + > + lockdep_assert_held_write(&vdev->memory_lock); > + > + list_for_each_entry_safe(priv, tmp, &vdev->dmabufs, dmabufs_elm) { > + /* > + * Returns true if a reference was successfully obtained. > + * The caller must interlock with the dmabuf's release > + * function in some way, such as RCU, to ensure that this > + * is not called on freed memory. > + */ > + if (!get_file_rcu(&priv->dmabuf->file)) > + continue; > + > + if (priv->revoked != revoked) { > + dma_resv_lock(priv->dmabuf->resv, NULL); > + priv->revoked = revoked; > + dma_buf_move_notify(priv->dmabuf); > + dma_resv_unlock(priv->dmabuf->resv); > + } > + dma_buf_put(priv->dmabuf); > + } > +} > + > +void vfio_pci_dma_buf_cleanup(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev) > +{ > + struct vfio_pci_dma_buf *priv; > + struct vfio_pci_dma_buf *tmp; > + > + down_write(&vdev->memory_lock); > + list_for_each_entry_safe(priv, tmp, &vdev->dmabufs, dmabufs_elm) { > + if (!get_file_rcu(&priv->dmabuf->file)) > + continue; > + dma_resv_lock(priv->dmabuf->resv, NULL); > + list_del_init(&priv->dmabufs_elm); > + priv->vdev = NULL; > + priv->revoked = true; > + dma_buf_move_notify(priv->dmabuf); > + dma_resv_unlock(priv->dmabuf->resv); > + vfio_device_put_registration(&vdev->vdev); > + dma_buf_put(priv->dmabuf); > + } > + up_write(&vdev->memory_lock); > +} > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c > index ea2745c1ac5e..5cc200e15edc 100644 > --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c > @@ -589,10 +589,12 @@ static int vfio_basic_config_write(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, int pos, > virt_mem = !!(le16_to_cpu(*virt_cmd) & PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY); > new_mem = !!(new_cmd & PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY); > > - if (!new_mem) > + if (!new_mem) { > vfio_pci_zap_and_down_write_memory_lock(vdev); > - else > + vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, true); > + } else { > down_write(&vdev->memory_lock); > + } > > /* > * If the user is writing mem/io enable (new_mem/io) and we > @@ -627,6 +629,8 @@ static int vfio_basic_config_write(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, int pos, > *virt_cmd &= cpu_to_le16(~mask); > *virt_cmd |= cpu_to_le16(new_cmd & mask); > > + if (__vfio_pci_memory_enabled(vdev)) > + vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, false); > up_write(&vdev->memory_lock); > } > > @@ -707,12 +711,16 @@ static int __init init_pci_cap_basic_perm(struct perm_bits *perm) > static void vfio_lock_and_set_power_state(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, > pci_power_t state) > { > - if (state >= PCI_D3hot) > + if (state >= PCI_D3hot) { > vfio_pci_zap_and_down_write_memory_lock(vdev); > - else > + vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, true); > + } else { > down_write(&vdev->memory_lock); > + } > > vfio_pci_set_power_state(vdev, state); > + if (__vfio_pci_memory_enabled(vdev)) > + vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, false); > up_write(&vdev->memory_lock); > } > > @@ -900,7 +908,10 @@ static int vfio_exp_config_write(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, int pos, > > if (!ret && (cap & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_FLR)) { > vfio_pci_zap_and_down_write_memory_lock(vdev); > + vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, true); > pci_try_reset_function(vdev->pdev); > + if (__vfio_pci_memory_enabled(vdev)) > + vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, true); > up_write(&vdev->memory_lock); > } > } > @@ -982,7 +993,10 @@ static int vfio_af_config_write(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, int pos, > > if (!ret && (cap & PCI_AF_CAP_FLR) && (cap & PCI_AF_CAP_TP)) { > vfio_pci_zap_and_down_write_memory_lock(vdev); > + vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, true); > pci_try_reset_function(vdev->pdev); > + if (__vfio_pci_memory_enabled(vdev)) > + vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, true); > up_write(&vdev->memory_lock); > } > } > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c > index c3269d708411..f69eda5956ad 100644 > --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c > @@ -287,6 +287,8 @@ static int vfio_pci_runtime_pm_entry(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, > * semaphore. > */ > vfio_pci_zap_and_down_write_memory_lock(vdev); > + vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, true); > + > if (vdev->pm_runtime_engaged) { > up_write(&vdev->memory_lock); > return -EINVAL; > @@ -370,6 +372,8 @@ static void vfio_pci_runtime_pm_exit(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev) > */ > down_write(&vdev->memory_lock); > __vfio_pci_runtime_pm_exit(vdev); > + if (__vfio_pci_memory_enabled(vdev)) > + vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, false); > up_write(&vdev->memory_lock); > } > > @@ -690,6 +694,8 @@ void vfio_pci_core_close_device(struct vfio_device *core_vdev) > #endif > vfio_pci_core_disable(vdev); > > + vfio_pci_dma_buf_cleanup(vdev); > + > mutex_lock(&vdev->igate); > if (vdev->err_trigger) { > eventfd_ctx_put(vdev->err_trigger); > @@ -1234,7 +1240,10 @@ static int vfio_pci_ioctl_reset(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, > */ > vfio_pci_set_power_state(vdev, PCI_D0); > > + vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, true); > ret = pci_try_reset_function(vdev->pdev); > + if (__vfio_pci_memory_enabled(vdev)) > + vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, false); > up_write(&vdev->memory_lock); > > return ret; > @@ -1523,6 +1532,8 @@ int vfio_pci_core_ioctl_feature(struct vfio_device *device, u32 flags, > return vfio_pci_core_pm_exit(vdev, flags, arg, argsz); > case VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_PCI_VF_TOKEN: > return vfio_pci_core_feature_token(vdev, flags, arg, argsz); > + case VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_DMA_BUF: > + return vfio_pci_core_feature_dma_buf(vdev, flags, arg, argsz); > default: > return -ENOTTY; > } > @@ -2098,6 +2109,7 @@ int vfio_pci_core_init_dev(struct vfio_device *core_vdev) > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vdev->dummy_resources_list); > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vdev->ioeventfds_list); > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vdev->sriov_pfs_item); > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vdev->dmabufs); > init_rwsem(&vdev->memory_lock); > xa_init(&vdev->ctx); > > @@ -2480,11 +2492,17 @@ static int vfio_pci_dev_set_hot_reset(struct vfio_device_set *dev_set, > * cause the PCI config space reset without restoring the original > * state (saved locally in 'vdev->pm_save'). > */ > - list_for_each_entry(vdev, &dev_set->device_list, vdev.dev_set_list) > + list_for_each_entry(vdev, &dev_set->device_list, vdev.dev_set_list) { > + vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, true); > vfio_pci_set_power_state(vdev, PCI_D0); > + } > > ret = pci_reset_bus(pdev); > > + list_for_each_entry(vdev, &dev_set->device_list, vdev.dev_set_list) > + if (__vfio_pci_memory_enabled(vdev)) > + vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, false); > + > vdev = list_last_entry(&dev_set->device_list, > struct vfio_pci_core_device, vdev.dev_set_list); > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_priv.h b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_priv.h > index 5e4fa69aee16..d27f383f3931 100644 > --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_priv.h > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_priv.h > @@ -101,4 +101,29 @@ static inline bool vfio_pci_is_vga(struct pci_dev *pdev) > return (pdev->class >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA; > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_SHARED_BUFFER > +int vfio_pci_core_feature_dma_buf(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, u32 flags, > + struct vfio_device_feature_dma_buf __user *arg, > + size_t argsz); > +void vfio_pci_dma_buf_cleanup(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev); > +void vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, bool revoked); > +#else > +static int > +vfio_pci_core_feature_dma_buf(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, u32 flags, > + struct vfio_device_feature_dma_buf __user *arg, > + size_t argsz) > +{ > + return -ENOTTY; > +} > + > +static inline void vfio_pci_dma_buf_cleanup(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev) > +{ > +} > + > +static inline void vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, > + bool revoked) > +{ > +} > +#endif > + > #endif > diff --git a/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h b/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h > index fbb472dd99b3..da5d8955ae56 100644 > --- a/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h > +++ b/include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h > @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ struct vfio_pci_core_device { > struct vfio_pci_core_device *sriov_pf_core_dev; > struct notifier_block nb; > struct rw_semaphore memory_lock; > + struct list_head dmabufs; > }; > > /* Will be exported for vfio pci drivers usage */ > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h > index c8dbf8219c4f..f43dfbde7352 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h > @@ -1458,6 +1458,35 @@ struct vfio_device_feature_bus_master { > }; > #define VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_BUS_MASTER 10 > > +/** > + * Upon VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_GET create a dma_buf fd for the > + * regions selected. > + * > + * For struct struct vfio_device_feature_dma_buf, open_flags are the typical > + * flags passed to open(2), eg O_RDWR, O_CLOEXEC, etc. nr_ranges is the total > + * number of dma_ranges that comprise the dmabuf. > + * > + * For struct vfio_region_dma_range, region_index/offset/length specify a slice > + * of the region to create the dmabuf from, if both offset & length are 0 then > + * the whole region is used. > + * > + * Return: The fd number on success, -1 and errno is set on failure. > + */ > +struct vfio_region_dma_range { > + __u32 region_index; > + __u32 __pad; > + __u64 offset; > + __u64 length; > +}; > + > +struct vfio_device_feature_dma_buf { > + __u32 open_flags; > + __u32 nr_ranges; > + struct vfio_region_dma_range dma_ranges[]; > +}; > + > +#define VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_DMA_BUF 11 > + > /* -------- API for Type1 VFIO IOMMU -------- */ > > /** -- Alexey

4 months, 2 weeks

[PATCH 0/4] Let userspace explicitly trigger memory reclaims

by Nicolas Frattaroli

RAM is not, in fact, cheap. Especially on embedded systems with a low amount of memory, but known and well-defined userspace, more explicit resource management can lead to better utilisation patterns. As an example, a resource manager process on a purpose-built device may wish to launch, and then explicitly swap out, memory of processes that are kept "warm", to improve perceived startup latency of individual full-screen applications without making the kernel figure out the usage pattern from observation alone in order to swap out the right pages. To allow for this explicit control in the context of panthor's GPU memory, add two new sysfs knobs. The first, mem_reclaim, runs an explicit priv BO reclaim cycle on the TGID written to it. The second, mem_claim, does the opposite: it swaps BOs back into active memory. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli(a)collabora.com> --- Nicolas Frattaroli (4): drm/panthor: Add freed_sz parameter to reclaim_priv_bos MAINTAINERS: Add sysfs ABI docs to list of panthor files drm/panthor: Add explicit memory reclaim sysfs knob drm/panthor: Add explicit memory claim sysfs knob Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-panthor-mem | 34 ++++++++ MAINTAINERS | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_drv.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gem.c | 7 +- drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_gem.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c | 70 +++++++++++++++- drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.h | 4 + 7 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) --- base-commit: 2c4b906cd135bbb44855287d0d0eff0ee0b47afe change-id: 20260506-panthor-explicit-reclaim-3dffed028d8c Best regards, -- Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli(a)collabora.com>

4 months, 2 weeks

[PATCH v2 00/10] dma-bug: heaps: Add Tegra VPR support

by Thierry Reding

From: Thierry Reding <treding(a)nvidia.com> Hi, This series adds support for the video protection region (VPR) used on Tegra SoC devices. It's a special region of memory that is protected from accesses by the CPU and used to store DRM protected content (both decrypted stream data as well as decoded video frames). Patches 1 and 2 add DT binding documentation for the VPR and add the VPR to the list of memory-region items for display and host1x. Patch 3 adds bitmap_allocate(), which is like bitmap_allocate_region() but works on sizes that are not a power of two. Patch 4 introduces new APIs needed by the Tegra VPR implementation that allow CMA areas to be dynamically created at runtime rather than using the fixed, system-wide list. This is used in this driver specifically because it can use an arbitrary number of these areas (though they are currently limited to 4). Patch 5 adds some infrastructure for DMA heap implementations to provide information through debugfs. The Tegra VPR implementation is added in patch 6. See its commit message for more details about the specifics of this implementation. Finally, patches 7-10 add the VPR placeholder node on Tegra234 and hook it up to the host1x and GPU nodes so that they can make use of this region. Changes in v2: - Tegra VPR implementation is now more optimized to reduce the number of (very slow) resize operations, and allows cross-chunk allocations - dynamic CMA areas are now trackd separately from static ones, but the global number of CMA pages accounts for all areas Thierry Thierry Reding (10): dt-bindings: reserved-memory: Document Tegra VPR dt-bindings: display: tegra: Document memory regions bitmap: Add bitmap_allocate() function mm/cma: Allow dynamically creating CMA areas dma-buf: heaps: Add debugfs support dma-buf: heaps: Add support for Tegra VPR arm64: tegra: Add VPR placeholder node on Tegra234 arm64: tegra: Add GPU node on Tegra234 arm64: tegra: Hook up VPR to host1x arm64: tegra: Hook up VPR to the GPU .../display/tegra/nvidia,tegra186-dc.yaml | 10 + .../display/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-dc.yaml | 10 +- .../display/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-host1x.yaml | 7 + .../nvidia,tegra-video-protection-region.yaml | 55 + arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 2 +- arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra234.dtsi | 60 + arch/s390/mm/init.c | 2 +- drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c | 56 + drivers/dma-buf/heaps/Kconfig | 7 + drivers/dma-buf/heaps/Makefile | 1 + drivers/dma-buf/heaps/cma_heap.c | 2 +- drivers/dma-buf/heaps/tegra-vpr.c | 1265 +++++++++++++++++ include/linux/bitmap.h | 25 +- include/linux/cma.h | 7 +- include/linux/dma-heap.h | 2 + include/trace/events/tegra_vpr.h | 57 + mm/cma.c | 187 ++- mm/cma.h | 5 +- 18 files changed, 1713 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/nvidia,tegra-video-protection-region.yaml create mode 100644 drivers/dma-buf/heaps/tegra-vpr.c create mode 100644 include/trace/events/tegra_vpr.h -- 2.52.0

4 months, 2 weeks

[PATCH] dma-buf/dma_fence_array: optimize handling v2

by Christian König

Removing the signal on any feature allows to simplfy the dma_fence_array code a lot and saves us from the need to install a callback on all fences at the same time. This results is less memory and CPU overhead. v2: fix potential double locking pointed out by Tvrtko Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig(a)amd.com> --- drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c | 134 +++++++++++++----------------- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 2 +- include/linux/dma-fence-array.h | 22 ++--- 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c index 5e10e8df372f..8b94c6287482 100644 --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c @@ -42,97 +42,88 @@ static void dma_fence_array_clear_pending_error(struct dma_fence_array *array) cmpxchg(&array->base.error, PENDING_ERROR, 0); } -static void irq_dma_fence_array_work(struct irq_work *wrk) +static void dma_fence_array_cb_func(struct dma_fence *f, + struct dma_fence_cb *cb) { - struct dma_fence_array *array = container_of(wrk, typeof(*array), work); - - dma_fence_array_clear_pending_error(array); + struct dma_fence_array *array = + container_of(cb, struct dma_fence_array, callback); - dma_fence_signal(&array->base); - dma_fence_put(&array->base); + irq_work_queue(&array->work); } -static void dma_fence_array_cb_func(struct dma_fence *f, - struct dma_fence_cb *cb) +static bool dma_fence_array_try_add_cb(struct dma_fence_array *array) { - struct dma_fence_array_cb *array_cb = - container_of(cb, struct dma_fence_array_cb, cb); - struct dma_fence_array *array = array_cb->array; + while (array->num_pending) { + struct dma_fence *f = array->fences[array->num_pending - 1]; - dma_fence_array_set_pending_error(array, f->error); + if (!dma_fence_add_callback(f, &array->callback, + dma_fence_array_cb_func)) + return true; - if (atomic_dec_and_test(&array->num_pending)) - irq_work_queue(&array->work); - else + dma_fence_array_set_pending_error(array, f->error); + --array->num_pending; + } + return false; +} + +static void dma_fence_array_irq_work(struct irq_work *wrk) +{ + struct dma_fence_array *array = container_of(wrk, typeof(*array), work); + + --array->num_pending; + if (!dma_fence_array_try_add_cb(array)) { + dma_fence_signal(&array->base); dma_fence_put(&array->base); + } } static bool dma_fence_array_enable_signaling(struct dma_fence *fence) { struct dma_fence_array *array = to_dma_fence_array(fence); - struct dma_fence_array_cb *cb = array->callbacks; - unsigned i; - for (i = 0; i < array->num_fences; ++i) { - cb[i].array = array; + /* + * As we may report that the fence is signaled before all + * callbacks are complete, we need to take an additional + * reference count on the array so that we do not free it too + * early. The core fence handling will only hold the reference + * until we signal the array as complete (but that is now + * insufficient). + */ + dma_fence_get(&array->base); + if (!dma_fence_array_try_add_cb(array)) { /* - * As we may report that the fence is signaled before all - * callbacks are complete, we need to take an additional - * reference count on the array so that we do not free it too - * early. The core fence handling will only hold the reference - * until we signal the array as complete (but that is now - * insufficient). + * When all fences are already signaled we can drop the reference again + * and report to the caller that the array can be signaled as well. */ - dma_fence_get(&array->base); - if (dma_fence_add_callback(array->fences[i], &cb[i].cb, - dma_fence_array_cb_func)) { - int error = array->fences[i]->error; - - dma_fence_array_set_pending_error(array, error); - dma_fence_put(&array->base); - if (atomic_dec_and_test(&array->num_pending)) { - dma_fence_array_clear_pending_error(array); - return false; - } - } + dma_fence_put(&array->base); + return false; } - return true; } static bool dma_fence_array_signaled(struct dma_fence *fence) { struct dma_fence_array *array = to_dma_fence_array(fence); - int num_pending; + int num_pending, error = 0; unsigned int i; /* - * We need to read num_pending before checking the enable_signal bit - * to avoid racing with the enable_signaling() implementation, which - * might decrement the counter, and cause a partial check. - * atomic_read_acquire() pairs with atomic_dec_and_test() in - * dma_fence_array_enable_signaling() - * - * The !--num_pending check is here to account for the any_signaled case - * if we race with enable_signaling(), that means the !num_pending check - * in the is_signalling_enabled branch might be outdated (num_pending - * might have been decremented), but that's fine. The user will get the - * right value when testing again later. + * Reading num_pending without a memory barrier here is correct since + * that is only for optimization, it is perfectly acceptable to have a + * stale value for it. In all other cases num_pending is accessed by a + * single call chain. */ - num_pending = atomic_read_acquire(&array->num_pending); - if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_ENABLE_SIGNAL_BIT, &array->base.flags)) { - if (num_pending <= 0) - goto signal; - return false; - } + num_pending = READ_ONCE(array->num_pending); + for (i = 0; i < num_pending; ++i) { + struct dma_fence *f = array->fences[i]; - for (i = 0; i < array->num_fences; ++i) { - if (dma_fence_is_signaled(array->fences[i]) && !--num_pending) - goto signal; - } - return false; + if (!dma_fence_is_signaled(f)) + return false; -signal: + if (!error) + error = f->error; + } + dma_fence_array_set_pending_error(array, error); dma_fence_array_clear_pending_error(array); return true; } @@ -171,15 +162,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_fence_array_ops); /** * dma_fence_array_alloc - Allocate a custom fence array - * @num_fences: [in] number of fences to add in the array * * Return dma fence array on success, NULL on failure */ -struct dma_fence_array *dma_fence_array_alloc(int num_fences) +struct dma_fence_array *dma_fence_array_alloc(void) { - struct dma_fence_array *array; - - return kzalloc_flex(*array, callbacks, num_fences); + return kzalloc_obj(struct dma_fence_array); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_fence_array_alloc); @@ -203,10 +191,13 @@ void dma_fence_array_init(struct dma_fence_array *array, WARN_ON(!num_fences || !fences); array->num_fences = num_fences; + array->num_pending = num_fences; + array->fences = fences; + array->base.error = PENDING_ERROR; dma_fence_init(&array->base, &dma_fence_array_ops, NULL, context, seqno); - init_irq_work(&array->work, irq_dma_fence_array_work); + init_irq_work(&array->work, dma_fence_array_irq_work); /* * dma_fence_array_enable_signaling() is invoked while holding @@ -220,11 +211,6 @@ void dma_fence_array_init(struct dma_fence_array *array, */ lockdep_set_class(&array->base.inline_lock, &dma_fence_array_lock_key); - atomic_set(&array->num_pending, num_fences); - array->fences = fences; - - array->base.error = PENDING_ERROR; - /* * dma_fence_array objects should never contain any other fence * containers or otherwise we run into recursion and potential kernel @@ -265,7 +251,7 @@ struct dma_fence_array *dma_fence_array_create(int num_fences, { struct dma_fence_array *array; - array = dma_fence_array_alloc(num_fences); + array = dma_fence_array_alloc(); if (!array) return NULL; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c index 62a87a051be7..8f472911469d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c @@ -3370,7 +3370,7 @@ static struct dma_fence *ops_execute(struct xe_vm *vm, goto err_trace; } - cf = dma_fence_array_alloc(n_fence); + cf = dma_fence_array_alloc(); if (!cf) { fence = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); goto err_out; diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence-array.h b/include/linux/dma-fence-array.h index 1b1d87579c38..3ee55c0e2fa4 100644 --- a/include/linux/dma-fence-array.h +++ b/include/linux/dma-fence-array.h @@ -15,16 +15,6 @@ #include <linux/dma-fence.h> #include <linux/irq_work.h> -/** - * struct dma_fence_array_cb - callback helper for fence array - * @cb: fence callback structure for signaling - * @array: reference to the parent fence array object - */ -struct dma_fence_array_cb { - struct dma_fence_cb cb; - struct dma_fence_array *array; -}; - /** * struct dma_fence_array - fence to represent an array of fences * @base: fence base class @@ -33,18 +23,17 @@ struct dma_fence_array_cb { * @num_pending: fences in the array still pending * @fences: array of the fences * @work: internal irq_work function - * @callbacks: array of callback helpers + * @callback: callback structure for signaling */ struct dma_fence_array { struct dma_fence base; - unsigned num_fences; - atomic_t num_pending; + unsigned int num_fences; + unsigned int num_pending; struct dma_fence **fences; struct irq_work work; - - struct dma_fence_array_cb callbacks[] __counted_by(num_fences); + struct dma_fence_cb callback; }; /** @@ -78,11 +67,10 @@ to_dma_fence_array(struct dma_fence *fence) for (index = 0, fence = dma_fence_array_first(head); fence; \ ++(index), fence = dma_fence_array_next(head, index)) -struct dma_fence_array *dma_fence_array_alloc(int num_fences); +struct dma_fence_array *dma_fence_array_alloc(void); void dma_fence_array_init(struct dma_fence_array *array, int num_fences, struct dma_fence **fences, u64 context, unsigned seqno); - struct dma_fence_array *dma_fence_array_create(int num_fences, struct dma_fence **fences, u64 context, unsigned seqno); -- 2.43.0

4 months, 2 weeks

[PATCH] dma-buf: system_heap: Optimize sg_table-to-pages conversion in vmap

by Barry Song (Xiaomi)

From: Xueyuan Chen <Xueyuan.chen21(a)gmail.com> Replace the heavy for_each_sgtable_page() iterator in system_heap_do_vmap() with a more efficient nested loop approach. Instead of iterating page by page, we now iterate through the scatterlist entries via for_each_sgtable_sg(). Because pages within a single sg entry are physically contiguous, we can populate the page array with a in an inner loop using simple pointer math. This save a lot of time. The WARN_ON check is also pulled out of the loop to save branch instructions. Performance results mapping a 2GB buffer on Radxa O6: - Before: ~1440000 ns - After: ~232000 ns (~84% reduction in iteration time, or ~6.2x faster) Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal(a)linaro.org> Cc: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard(a)collabora.com> Cc: Brian Starkey <Brian.Starkey(a)arm.com> Cc: John Stultz <jstultz(a)google.com> Cc: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier(a)google.com> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig(a)amd.com> Signed-off-by: Xueyuan Chen <Xueyuan.chen21(a)gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Barry Song (Xiaomi) <baohua(a)kernel.org> --- drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c | 13 +++++++++---- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c index b3650d8fd651..769f01f0cc96 100644 --- a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c @@ -224,16 +224,21 @@ static void *system_heap_do_vmap(struct system_heap_buffer *buffer) int npages = PAGE_ALIGN(buffer->len) / PAGE_SIZE; struct page **pages = vmalloc(sizeof(struct page *) * npages); struct page **tmp = pages; - struct sg_page_iter piter; void *vaddr; + u32 i, j, count; + struct page *base_page; + struct scatterlist *sg; if (!pages) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); - for_each_sgtable_page(table, &piter, 0) { - WARN_ON(tmp - pages >= npages); - *tmp++ = sg_page_iter_page(&piter); + for_each_sgtable_sg(table, sg, i) { + base_page = sg_page(sg); + count = sg->length >> PAGE_SHIFT; + for (j = 0; j < count; j++) + *tmp++ = base_page + j; } + WARN_ON(tmp - pages != npages); vaddr = vmap(pages, npages, VM_MAP, PAGE_KERNEL); vfree(pages); -- 2.39.3 (Apple Git-146)

4 months, 2 weeks

Re: Regression due to /sys/kernel/dmabuf/buffers removal

by T.J. Mercier

On Tue, May 5, 2026 at 6:00 AM Julian Orth <ju.orth(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, May 5, 2026 at 2:41 PM Christian König <christian.koenig(a)amd.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Julian, > > > > On 5/5/26 14:25, Julian Orth wrote: > > > In ab4c3dcf9a71582503b4fb25aeab884c696cab25 ("dma-buf: Remove DMA-BUF > > > sysfs stats") the /sys/kernel/dmabuf/buffer directory was removed. > > > > > > I've been using this interface, specifically the exporter_name file, > > > to detect dmabufs created via udmabuf. Such dmabufs show "udmabuf" in > > > exporter_name. I've been doing this for two reasons: 1) to detect that > > > mmap on such buffers will be fast and 2) to detect that GPU access to > > > such buffers will be slow. > > > > Crap, I really hoped that Android was the only user of that sysfs interface since that approach turned out to be quite broken. > > > > It's number one rule on Linux that we don't break userspace. So I hope that you don't insist on bringing that interface back, but if you do I will just revert the removal until we found a better solution. > > Bringing it back shouldn't be necessary. > > > > > > With the removal of that file, that detection mechanism no longer works. > > > > > > I'm not particularly fond of that mechanism but it was the only one > > > providing that functionality that I could find at the time. If there > > > is another one, ideally an ioctl on the dmabuf, please let me know. > > > > The virtual fdinfo file you can find under /proc/$pid/fdinfo/$fd also contains the exporter name for the DMA-buf. > > > > You can find the full documentation here: https://docs.kernel.org/filesystems/proc.html#dma-buffer-files > > > > Is that sufficient? > > I think that is sufficient. I probably didn't use fdinfo initially > because 1) it's a lot more work to parse and 2) I wasn't sure if it > was intended to be machine-readable or if there could sometimes be > newlines in the values and such. > > > > > Additional to that the debugfs for DMA-buf also contains that information and I'm open to the suggestion with the IOCTL. > > My application runs as a regular user so it cannot access /sys/kernel/debug. > > Having an IOCTL would be ideal if it is not too much work. I'll fall > back to fdinfo for now. > > Thanks, Julian Phew, I'm glad fdinfo suits your needs. Adding an ioctl would introduce new UAPI so I think we'd want to avoid that unless absolutely necessary. Thanks, T.J. > > > > Regards, > > Christian. > > > > > > > > Shipping an entire BPF compiler in my application, which the original > > > patch suggests as the replacement, is not an option when the removed > > > alternative was simply reading a file. > > > > > > Thanks, Julian > >

4 months, 2 weeks

Regression due to /sys/kernel/dmabuf/buffers removal

by Julian Orth

In ab4c3dcf9a71582503b4fb25aeab884c696cab25 ("dma-buf: Remove DMA-BUF sysfs stats") the /sys/kernel/dmabuf/buffer directory was removed. I've been using this interface, specifically the exporter_name file, to detect dmabufs created via udmabuf. Such dmabufs show "udmabuf" in exporter_name. I've been doing this for two reasons: 1) to detect that mmap on such buffers will be fast and 2) to detect that GPU access to such buffers will be slow. With the removal of that file, that detection mechanism no longer works. I'm not particularly fond of that mechanism but it was the only one providing that functionality that I could find at the time. If there is another one, ideally an ioctl on the dmabuf, please let me know. Shipping an entire BPF compiler in my application, which the original patch suggests as the replacement, is not an option when the removed alternative was simply reading a file. Thanks, Julian

4 months, 2 weeks

[PATCH 1/2] dma-buf/dma_fence_array: remove unused functionality v3

by Christian König

Amdgpu was the only user of the signal on any feature and we dropped that use case recently, so we can remove that functionality. v2: update num_pending only after the fence is signaled v3: separate out simplifying dma_fence_array implementation Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig(a)amd.com> --- drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c | 13 ++++--------- drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-unwrap.c | 3 +-- drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c | 3 +-- drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-unwrap.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 3 +-- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 4 ++-- include/linux/dma-fence-array.h | 6 ++---- 8 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c index 089f69469524..5e10e8df372f 100644 --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c @@ -190,15 +190,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_fence_array_alloc); * @fences: [in] array containing the fences * @context: [in] fence context to use * @seqno: [in] sequence number to use - * @signal_on_any: [in] signal on any fence in the array * * Implementation of @dma_fence_array_create without allocation. Useful to init * a preallocated dma fence array in the path of reclaim or dma fence signaling. */ void dma_fence_array_init(struct dma_fence_array *array, int num_fences, struct dma_fence **fences, - u64 context, unsigned seqno, - bool signal_on_any) + u64 context, unsigned seqno) { static struct lock_class_key dma_fence_array_lock_key; @@ -222,7 +220,7 @@ void dma_fence_array_init(struct dma_fence_array *array, */ lockdep_set_class(&array->base.inline_lock, &dma_fence_array_lock_key); - atomic_set(&array->num_pending, signal_on_any ? 1 : num_fences); + atomic_set(&array->num_pending, num_fences); array->fences = fences; array->base.error = PENDING_ERROR; @@ -249,7 +247,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_fence_array_init); * @fences: [in] array containing the fences * @context: [in] fence context to use * @seqno: [in] sequence number to use - * @signal_on_any: [in] signal on any fence in the array * * Allocate a dma_fence_array object and initialize the base fence with * dma_fence_init(). @@ -264,8 +261,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_fence_array_init); */ struct dma_fence_array *dma_fence_array_create(int num_fences, struct dma_fence **fences, - u64 context, unsigned seqno, - bool signal_on_any) + u64 context, unsigned seqno) { struct dma_fence_array *array; @@ -273,8 +269,7 @@ struct dma_fence_array *dma_fence_array_create(int num_fences, if (!array) return NULL; - dma_fence_array_init(array, num_fences, fences, - context, seqno, signal_on_any); + dma_fence_array_init(array, num_fences, fences, context, seqno); return array; } diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-unwrap.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-unwrap.c index 07fe9bf45aea..53bb40e70b27 100644 --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-unwrap.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-unwrap.c @@ -180,8 +180,7 @@ struct dma_fence *__dma_fence_unwrap_merge(unsigned int num_fences, if (count > 1) { result = dma_fence_array_create(count, array, - dma_fence_context_alloc(1), - 1, false); + dma_fence_context_alloc(1), 1); if (!result) { for (i = 0; i < count; i++) dma_fence_put(array[i]); diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c index ce9e6c04897f..39a92d9f2413 100644 --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c @@ -648,8 +648,7 @@ int dma_resv_get_singleton(struct dma_resv *obj, enum dma_resv_usage usage, } array = dma_fence_array_create(count, fences, - dma_fence_context_alloc(1), - 1, false); + dma_fence_context_alloc(1), 1); if (!array) { while (count--) dma_fence_put(fences[count]); diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-unwrap.c b/drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-unwrap.c index 51c87869b7b8..4e7ee25372ba 100644 --- a/drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-unwrap.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-unwrap.c @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static struct dma_fence *mock_array(unsigned int num_fences, ...) array = dma_fence_array_create(num_fences, fences, dma_fence_context_alloc(1), - 1, false); + 1); if (!array) goto error_free; return &array->base; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c index 942f4eed817f..4a1a9031f9db 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c @@ -3205,8 +3205,7 @@ eb_composite_fence_create(struct i915_execbuffer *eb, int out_fence_fd) fence_array = dma_fence_array_create(eb->num_batches, fences, eb->context->parallel.fence_context, - eb->context->parallel.seqno++, - false); + eb->context->parallel.seqno++); if (!fence_array) { kfree(fences); return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.c index 24d6d9af20d6..37866768d64c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.c @@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ xe_sync_in_fence_get(struct xe_sync_entry *sync, int num_sync, xe_assert(vm->xe, current_fence == num_fence); cf = dma_fence_array_create(num_fence, fences, dma_fence_context_alloc(1), - 1, false); + 1); if (!cf) goto err_out; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c index 56e2db50bb36..8f472911469d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c @@ -3370,7 +3370,7 @@ static struct dma_fence *ops_execute(struct xe_vm *vm, goto err_trace; } - cf = dma_fence_array_alloc(n_fence); + cf = dma_fence_array_alloc(); if (!cf) { fence = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); goto err_out; @@ -3414,7 +3414,7 @@ static struct dma_fence *ops_execute(struct xe_vm *vm, xe_assert(vm->xe, current_fence == n_fence); dma_fence_array_init(cf, n_fence, fences, dma_fence_context_alloc(1), - 1, false); + 1); fence = &cf->base; for_each_tile(tile, vm->xe, id) { diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence-array.h b/include/linux/dma-fence-array.h index 370b3d2bba37..1b1d87579c38 100644 --- a/include/linux/dma-fence-array.h +++ b/include/linux/dma-fence-array.h @@ -81,13 +81,11 @@ to_dma_fence_array(struct dma_fence *fence) struct dma_fence_array *dma_fence_array_alloc(int num_fences); void dma_fence_array_init(struct dma_fence_array *array, int num_fences, struct dma_fence **fences, - u64 context, unsigned seqno, - bool signal_on_any); + u64 context, unsigned seqno); struct dma_fence_array *dma_fence_array_create(int num_fences, struct dma_fence **fences, - u64 context, unsigned seqno, - bool signal_on_any); + u64 context, unsigned seqno); bool dma_fence_match_context(struct dma_fence *fence, u64 context); -- 2.43.0

4 months, 2 weeks

Re: [PATCH v11 08/11] tee: add Qualcomm TEE driver

by Dmitry Baryshkov

On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 08:41:21PM -0700, Amirreza Zarrabi wrote: > Introduce qcomtee_object, which represents an object in both QTEE and > the kernel. QTEE clients can invoke an instance of qcomtee_object to > access QTEE services. If this invocation produces a new object in QTEE, > an instance of qcomtee_object will be returned. > > Similarly, QTEE can request services from by issuing a callback > request, which invokes an instance of qcomtee_object. > > Implement initial support for exporting qcomtee_object to userspace > and QTEE, enabling the invocation of objects hosted in QTEE and userspace > through the TEE subsystem. > > Tested-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong(a)linaro.org> > Tested-by: Harshal Dev <quic_hdev(a)quicinc.com> > Acked-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg(a)oss.qualcomm.com> > Signed-off-by: Amirreza Zarrabi <amirreza.zarrabi(a)oss.qualcomm.com> > --- > MAINTAINERS | 6 + > drivers/tee/Kconfig | 1 + > drivers/tee/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/tee/qcomtee/Kconfig | 12 + > drivers/tee/qcomtee/Makefile | 7 + > drivers/tee/qcomtee/async.c | 182 +++++++ > drivers/tee/qcomtee/call.c | 813 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/tee/qcomtee/core.c | 906 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/tee/qcomtee/qcomtee.h | 143 ++++++ > drivers/tee/qcomtee/qcomtee_msg.h | 304 ++++++++++++ > drivers/tee/qcomtee/qcomtee_object.h | 316 ++++++++++++ > drivers/tee/qcomtee/shm.c | 153 ++++++ > drivers/tee/qcomtee/user_obj.c | 692 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/uapi/linux/tee.h | 1 + > 14 files changed, 3537 insertions(+) > > + > +static int > +qcomtee_object_invoke_ctx_invoke(struct qcomtee_object_invoke_ctx *oic, > + int *result, u64 *res_type) > +{ > + phys_addr_t out_msg_paddr; > + phys_addr_t in_msg_paddr; > + int ret; > + u64 res; > + > + tee_shm_get_pa(oic->out_shm, 0, &out_msg_paddr); > + tee_shm_get_pa(oic->in_shm, 0, &in_msg_paddr); > + if (!(oic->flags & QCOMTEE_OIC_FLAG_BUSY)) > + ret = qcom_scm_qtee_invoke_smc(in_msg_paddr, oic->in_msg.size, > + out_msg_paddr, oic->out_msg.size, > + &res, res_type); > + else > + ret = qcom_scm_qtee_callback_response(out_msg_paddr, > + oic->out_msg.size, > + &res, res_type); > + > + if (ret) > + pr_err("QTEE returned with %d.\n", ret); > + else > + *result = (int)res; After enablign QCOMTEE driver, I observe the following error during the bootup on RB3 Gen2: [ 4.720777] qcomtee: QTEE returned with -22. [ 4.725251] qcomtee: QTEE version 0.0.0 > + > + return ret; > +} > + -- With best wishes Dmitry

4 months, 2 weeks

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

Linaro-mm-sig May 2026