Ever dreamed of running your own bustling enterprise, watching your profits soar, and building an empire from humble beginnings? If so, you've likely stumbled upon the fascinating and surprisingly addictive world of store management games. These titles offer a unique blend of strategy, incremental growth, and the satisfying feeling of seeing your hard work pay off. And when it comes to the purest, most delightful form of this genre, one game stands out: https://cookieclickers.io/
The Sweet Simplicity of Cookie Clicker: A Gateway to Management
At its heart, Cookie Clicker is incredibly simple. You start with a single, humble cookie, and your goal is to click it to generate more cookies. These initial clicks are crucial, as they fund your first upgrades. Soon, you’ll be able to purchase "grandmas," who automatically bake cookies for you, freeing up your clicking finger. From there, the sky's the limit! You'll acquire farms, factories, mines, and even portals to other dimensions, all dedicated to the singular purpose of baking more and more cookies.
What makes Cookie Clicker so captivating is its elegant progression system. Each new upgrade and building provides a tangible boost to your cookie production, creating a satisfying feedback loop. The numbers on your screen grow exponentially, transforming from humble dozens to mind-boggling septillions and beyond. It’s a masterclass in incremental design, making every new purchase feel impactful and exciting.
Beyond the Click: Strategic Thinking and Exponential Growth
While the initial appeal of Cookie Clicker might be the simple act of clicking, true mastery lies in strategic decision-making. As your cookie empire expands, you'll be faced with choices:
Upgrade Prioritization: Should you invest in another Grandma, a new farm, or a powerful upgrade that boosts all your existing structures? Understanding the cost-benefit analysis of each option is key.
Synergies: Many upgrades have synergistic effects, meaning they become more powerful when paired with specific buildings. Discovering these combinations is a delightful puzzle.
Ascension and Prestige: Eventually, you’ll unlock the ability to “ascend,” resetting your game but granting you powerful "heavenly chips" that provide permanent bonuses. This meta-progression adds a whole new layer of long-term strategy, encouraging you to rethink your approach with each new playthrough.
These elements elevate Cookie Clicker from a simple clicking game to a genuinely engaging management simulation. It teaches you about exponential growth, compound interest (in a fun, cookie-filled way!), and the satisfaction of building something from nothing.
Tips for Aspiring Cookie Tycoons
If you’re ready to dive into the sweet, sweet world of Cookie Clicker, here are a few friendly tips to get you started:
Don't Be Afraid to Click! In the early game, your clicks are your most valuable resource. Keep that finger moving!
Invest in Grandmas Early: They're your first step towards automation and a steady cookie income.
Always Buy Upgrades: The small boosts they provide add up quickly and are often more cost-effective than new buildings in the short term.
Look for Golden Cookies: These appear randomly and offer temporary, powerful buffs. Clicking them can drastically boost your production!
Consider Ascending: While it seems daunting to reset your progress, the permanent bonuses you gain make future runs much faster and more efficient.
The Endless Appeal of Automation
Cookie Clicker, and store management games in general, tap into a fundamental human desire: the joy of creation and the satisfaction of watching systems work efficiently. There's a particular kind of quiet pleasure in setting up a well-oiled machine and observing its output multiply. So, if you're looking for a game that's easy to pick up, surprisingly deep, and immensely satisfying, give Cookie Clicker a try. You might just find yourself baking billions before you know it!
Most of this patch series has already been pushed upstream, this is just
the second half of the patch series that has not been pushed yet + some
additional changes which were required to implement changes requested by
the mailing list. This patch series is originally from Asahi, previously
posted by Daniel Almeida.
The previous version of the patch series can be found here:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/164580/
Branch with patches applied available here
sure this builds:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lyudess/linux/-/commits/rust/gem-shmem
This patch series applies on top of drm-rust-next
Lyude Paul (5):
rust: drm: gem: s/device::Device/Device/ for shmem.rs
drm/gem/shmem: Introduce __drm_gem_shmem_free_sgt_locked()
drm/gem/shmem: Export drm_gem_shmem_get_pages_sgt_locked()
rust: drm: gem: Introduce shmem::SGTable
rust: drm: gem: Add vmap functions to shmem bindings
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c | 48 ++-
include/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.h | 2 +
rust/kernel/drm/gem/shmem.rs | 557 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
3 files changed, 593 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
base-commit: a7a080bb4236ebe577b6776d940d1717912ff6dd
--
2.53.0
Enable experimental rust support for ppc64le and ppc32be. The patch for
ppc32 has been provided by Link Mauve[1] and ppc64le support[2] has been
merged over it. ppc32 needs some toolchain fixes mentioned in the patch
`rust: Add PowerPC support` and the discussion for that is done here[1].
This has been tested on
- powernv9 hardware
- pseries P11 hardware
- pseries(9, 10) qemu
- powernv(9, 10) qemu
- rustdoc on x86 and powerpc64le
- rusttest on x86 and powerpc64le
We are actively working with our LLVM team to get the target for ppc,
ppc64 and ppc64le in the rust compiler.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260204030507.8203-1-linkmauve@linkmauve.fr
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260204042417.83903-1-mkchauras@gmail.com
Changelog:
V12 -> V13:
- Added a patch for fixing build issue on ppc32 by Link Mauve
- Added another patch to fix a build issue in dma-buf
- Added another patch to enforce minimum `rustc` version for powerpc
V12: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260421120958.190430-1-mkchauras@gmail.com/
V11 -> V12:
- Rebased to mainline (rust/Makefile conflict resolved)
V11: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260417152253.2312961-1-mkchauras@gmail.com/
V10 -> V11:
- Updated `rust/Makefile`
- Not all libraries are move to `rust/host` directory now. Only
proc_macro2, quote and syn are moved
- Special handling for pin init is added. Details in commit
- Removed mkdir for `rust/host`, this is now handled by toolchain.
V10: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260406200149.3727922-1-mkchauras@gmail.com/
V9 -> V10:
- rust/Makefile updated with review comments from Miguel
- Patch 1/4 updated with commit message and subject
V9: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260404121610.1956528-1-mkchauras@gmail.com/
V8 -> V9:
- rust/Makefile updated with a directory instead of abspath
V8: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260403145308.1042622-1-mkchauras@gmail.com/
V7 -> V8:
- rust/Makefile updated to separate host libraries from target
V7: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260329160254.2592207-1-mkchauras@gmail.com/
Changelog:
V6 -> V7:
- Documentation removed as powerpc is still under development
- Added a fix for race condition in rust/Makefile
V6: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260210090023.2587534-1-mkchauras@gmail.com
V5 -> V6:
- Added a missing Tested by from Venkat which got missed since V3
- Support is marked as Maintained instead of experimental
V5: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260210053756.2088302-1-mkchauras@gmail.com
V4 -> V5:
- Removed a nested ifdef from PPC64 for Little endian toolchain
V4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260209105456.1551677-1-mkchauras@gmail.com
V3 -> V4:
- Co-developed-by header added in patch 1
V3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260205180429.3280657-1-mkchauras@gmail.com
V2 -> V3:
- Splited HAVE_RUST in 2 lines
- BINDGEN_TARGET_powerpc initialized before assigning the same to
BINDGEN_TARGET
V2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260204210125.613350-1-mkchauras@gmail.com
V1 -> V2:
- jump label fix for rust has been moved to a separate patch
- PPC32 support has been taken
- rust support has been marked experimental
- target.json dependency has been removed
- HAVE_RUST now depends on CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN for PPC64
Link Mauve (2):
rust: Make __udivdi3() and __umoddi3() panic
rust: Add PowerPC support
Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya (IBM) (5):
rust: Fix "multiple candidates for rmeta dependency core" error
dma-resv: Fix undefined symbol when CONFIG_DMA_SHARED_BUFFER is
disabled
powerpc/jump_label: adjust inline asm to be consistent
rust/powerpc: Set min rustc version for powerpc
powerpc: Enable Rust for ppc64le
arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 2 ++
arch/powerpc/Makefile | 7 ++++
arch/powerpc/include/asm/jump_label.h | 23 ++++++------
include/linux/dma-resv.h | 2 +-
rust/Makefile | 52 +++++++++++++++++----------
rust/compiler_builtins.rs | 6 ++++
scripts/min-tool-version.sh | 6 +++-
7 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
--
2.53.0
With professionalism and integrity, Block Recovery Team assures that their clients get the finest possible help in retrieving their lost digital assets. With a staff of professionals dedicated to assisting individuals in navigating the recovery process, they provide 24 hour support to guarantee that customers receive timely and effective assistance when they need it the most. Testimonials from delighted clients demonstrate Block Recovery Team abilities in recovering lost digital assets, emphasizing their dedication to client satisfaction and good outcomes. NO UPFRONT FEES REQUIRED.
Online presence: Block Recovery Team
Hi,
The recent introduction of heaps in the optee driver [1] made possible
the creation of heaps as modules.
It's generally a good idea if possible, including for the already
existing system and CMA heaps.
The system one is pretty trivial, the CMA is now easy too with the
reworks we got in 7.1-r1.
Let me know what you think,
Maxime
1: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20250911135007.1275833-4-jens.wiklander@l…
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard(a)kernel.org>
---
Changes in v5:
- Rebase on 7.1-rc1
- Add a patch to enable the heaps in arm64 defconfig
- Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260331-dma-buf-heaps-as-modules-v4-0-e18fda5044…
Changes in v4:
- Fix compilation failure
- Rework to take into account OF_RESERVED_MEM
- Fix regression making the default CMA area disappear if not created
through the DT
- Added some documentation and comments
- Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260303-dma-buf-heaps-as-modules-v3-0-24344812c7…
Changes in v3:
- Squashed cma_get_name and cma_alloc/release patches
- Fixed typo in Export dev_get_cma_area commit title
- Fixed compilation failure with DMA_CMA but not OF_RESERVED_MEM
- Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260227-dma-buf-heaps-as-modules-v2-0-454aee7e06…
Changes in v2:
- Collect tags
- Don't export dma_contiguous_default_area anymore, but export
dev_get_cma_area instead
- Mentioned that heap modules can't be removed
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260225-dma-buf-heaps-as-modules-v1-0-2109225a09…
---
Maxime Ripard (4):
dma-buf: heaps: Export mem_accounting parameter
dma-buf: heaps: cma: Turn the heap into a module
dma-buf: heaps: system: Turn the heap into a module
arm64: defconfig: Enable dma-buf heaps
arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 3 +++
drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c | 1 +
drivers/dma-buf/heaps/Kconfig | 4 ++--
drivers/dma-buf/heaps/cma_heap.c | 3 +++
drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c | 5 +++++
5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 5e9b7d093f3f77cb0af4409559e3d139babfb443
change-id: 20260225-dma-buf-heaps-as-modules-1034b3ec9f2a
Best regards,
--
Maxime Ripard <mripard(a)kernel.org>
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri(a)nvidia.com>
Confidential computing (CoCo) VMs/guests, such as AMD SEV and Intel TDX,
run with private/encrypted memory which creates a challenge
for devices that do not support DMA to it (no TDISP support).
For kernel-only DMA operations, swiotlb bounce buffering provides a
transparent solution by copying data through shared memory.
However, the only way to get this memory into userspace is via the DMA
API's dma_alloc_pages()/dma_mmap_pages() type interfaces which limits
the use of the memory to a single DMA device, and is incompatible with
pin_user_pages().
These limitations are particularly problematic for the RDMA subsystem
which makes heavy use of pin_user_pages() and expects flexible memory
usage between many different DMA devices.
This patch series enables userspace to explicitly request shared
(decrypted) memory allocations from new dma-buf system_cc_shared heap.
Userspace can mmap this memory and pass the dma-buf fd to other
existing importers such as RDMA or DRM devices to access the
memory. The DMA API is improved to allow the dma heap exporter to DMA
map the shared memory to each importing device.
Based on dma-mapping-for-next e7442a68cd1ee797b585f045d348781e9c0dde0d
Jiri Pirko (2):
dma-mapping: introduce DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED for shared memory
dma-buf: heaps: system: add system_cc_shared heap for explicitly
shared memory
drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 10 +++
include/trace/events/dma.h | 3 +-
kernel/dma/direct.h | 14 +++-
kernel/dma/mapping.c | 13 +++-
5 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--
2.51.1
Hi all,
This series is based on previous RFCs/discussions:
Tech topic: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20250918214425.2677057-1-amastro@fb.com/
RFCv1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260226202211.929005-1-mattev@meta.com/
RFCv2: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20260312184613.3710705-1-mattev@meta.com/
The background/rationale is covered in more detail in the RFC cover
letters. The TL;DR is:
The goal is to enable userspace driver designs that use VFIO to export
DMABUFs representing subsets of PCI device BARs, and "vend" those
buffers from a primary process to other subordinate processes by fd.
These processes then mmap() the buffers and their access to the device
is isolated to the exported ranges. This is an improvement on sharing
the VFIO device fd to subordinate processes, which would allow
unfettered access .
This is achieved by enabling mmap() of vfio-pci DMABUFs. Second, a
new ioctl()-based revocation mechanism is added to allow the primary
process to forcibly revoke access to previously-shared BAR spans, even
if the subordinate processes haven't cleanly exited.
(The related topic of safe delegation of iommufd control to the
subordinate processes is not addressed here, and is follow-up work.)
As well as isolation and revocation, another advantage to accessing a
BAR through a VMA backed by a DMABUF is that it's straightforward to
create the buffer with access attributes, such as write-combining.
Notes on patches
================
Feedback from the RFCs requested that, instead of creating
DMABUF-specific vm_ops and .fault paths, to go the whole way and
migrate the existing VFIO PCI BAR mmap() to be backed by a DMABUF too,
resulting in a common vm_ops and fault handler for mmap()s of both the
VFIO device and explicitly-exported DMABUFs. This has been done for
vfio-pci, but not sub-drivers (nvgrace-gpu's special-case mappings are
unchanged).
vfio/pci: Fix vfio_pci_dma_buf_cleanup() double-put
A bug fix to a related are, whose context is a depdency for later
patches.
vfio/pci: Add a helper to look up PFNs for DMABUFs
vfio/pci: Add a helper to create a DMABUF for a BAR-map VMA
The first is for a DMABUF VMA fault handler to determine
arbitrary-sized PFNs from ranges in DMABUF. Secondly, refactor
DMABUF export for use by the existing export feature and a new
helper that creates a DMABUF corresponding to a VFIO BAR mmap()
request.
vfio/pci: Convert BAR mmap() to use a DMABUF
The vfio-pci core mmap() creates a DMABUF with the helper, and the
vm_ops fault handler uses the other helper to resolve the fault.
Because this depends on DMABUF structs/code, CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_CORE
needs to depend on CONFIG_DMA_SHARED_BUFFER. The
CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_DMABUF still conditionally enables the export
support code.
NOTE: The user mmap()s a device fd, but the resulting VMA's vm_file
becomes that of the DMABUF which takes ownership of the device and
puts it on release. This maintains the existing behaviour of a VMA
keeping the VFIO device open.
BAR zapping then happens via the existing vfio_pci_dma_buf_move()
path, which now needs to unmap PTEs in the DMABUF's address_space.
vfio/pci: Provide a user-facing name for BAR mappings
There was a request for decent debug naming in /proc/<pid>/maps
etc. comparable to the existing VFIO names: since the VMAs are
DMABUFs, they have a "dmabuf:" prefix and can't be 100% identical
to before. This is a user-visible change, but this patch at least
now gives us extra info on the BDF & BAR being mapped.
vfio/pci: Clean up BAR zap and revocation
In general (see NOTE!) the vfio_pci_zap_bars() is now obsolete,
since it unmaps PTEs in the VFIO device address_space which is now
unused. This consolidates all calls (e.g. around reset) with the
neighbouring vfio_pci_dma_buf_move()s into new functions, to
revoke-zap/unrevoke.
NOTE: the nvgrace-gpu driver continues to use its own private
vm_ops, fault handler, etc. for its special memregions, and these
DO still add PTEs to the VFIO device address_space. So, a
temporary flag, vdev->bar_needs_zap, maintains the old behaviour
for this use. At least this patch's consolidation makes it easy
to remove the remaining zap when this need goes away.
A FIXME is added: if nvgrace-gpu is converted to DMABUFs, remove
the flag and final zap.
vfio/pci: Support mmap() of a VFIO DMABUF
Adds mmap() for a DMABUF fd exported from vfio-pci.
It was a goal to keep the VFIO device fd lifetime behaviour
unchanged with respect to the DMABUFs. An application can close
all device fds, and this will revoke/clean up all DMABUFs; no
mappings or other access can be performed now. When enabling
mmap() of the DMABUFs, this means access through the VMA is also
revoked. This complicates the fault handler because whilst the
DMABUF exists, it has no guarantee that the corresponding VFIO
device is still alive. Adds synchronisation ensuring the vdev is
available before vdev->memory_lock is touched.
(I decided against the alternative of preventing cleanup by holding
the VFIO device open if any DMABUFs exist, because it's both a
change of behaviour and less clean overall.)
I've added a chonky comment in place, happy to clarify more if you
have ideas.
vfio/pci: Permanently revoke a DMABUF on request
By weight, this is mostly a rename of revoked to an enum, status.
There are now 3 states for a buffer, usable and revoked
temporary/permanent. A new VFIO device ioctl is added,
VFIO_DEVICE_PCI_DMABUF_REVOKE, which passes a DMABUF (exported from
that device) and permanently revokes it. Thus a userspace driver
can guarantee any downstream consumers of a shared fd are prevented
from accessing a BAR range, and that range can be reused.
The code doing revocation in vfio_pci_dma_buf_move() is moved,
unchanged, to a common function for use by _move() and the new
ioctl path.
Q: I can't think of a good reason to temporarily revoke/unrevoke
buffers from userspace, so didn't add a 'flags' field to the ioctl
struct. Easy to add if people think it's worthwhile for future
use.
vfio/pci: Add mmap() attributes to DMABUF feature
Reserves bits [31:28] in vfio_device_feature_dma_buf to allow a
(CPU) mapping attribute to be specified for an exported set of
ranges. The default is the current UC, and a new flag can specify
CPU access as WC.
Q: I've taken 4 bits; the intention is for this field to be a
scalar not a bitmap (i.e. mutually-exclusive access properties).
Perhaps 4 is a bit too many?
Testing
=======
(The [RFC ONLY] userspace test program, for QEMU edu-plus, has been
dropped, but can be found in the GitHub branch below.)
This code has been tested in mapping DMABUFs of single/multiple
ranges, aliasing mmap()s, aliasing ranges across DMABUFs, vm_pgoff >
0, revocation, shutdown/cleanup scenarios, and hugepage mappings seem
to work correctly. I've lightly tested WC mappings also (by observing
resulting PTEs as having the correct attributes...). No regressions
observed on the VFIO selftests, or on our internal vfio-pci
applications.
End
===
This is based on -next (next-20260414 but will merge earlier), as it
depends on Leon's series "vfio: Wait for dma-buf invalidation to
complete":
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20260205-nocturnal-poetic-chamois-f566a…
These commits are on GitHub, along with "[RFC ONLY] selftests: vfio: Add
standalone vfio_dmabuf_mmap_test":
https://github.com/metamev/linux/compare/next-20260414...metamev:linux:dev/…
Thanks for reading,
Matt
================================================================================
Change log:
v1:
- Cleanup of the common DMABUF-aware VMA vm_ops fault handler and
export code.
- Fixed a lot of races, particularly faults racing with DMABUF
cleanup (if the VFIO device fds close, for example).
- Added nicer human-readable names for VFIO mmap() VMAs
RFCv2: Respin based on the feedback/suggestions:
https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20260312184613.3710705-1-mattev@meta.com/
- Transform the existing VFIO BAR mmap path to also use DMABUFs
behind the scenes, and then simply share that code for
explicitly-mapped DMABUFs. Jason wanted to go that direction to
enable iommufd VFIO type 1 emulation to pick up a DMABUF for an IO
mapping.
- Revoke buffers using a VFIO device fd ioctl
RFCv1:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260226202211.929005-1-mattev@meta.com/
Matt Evans (9):
vfio/pci: Fix vfio_pci_dma_buf_cleanup() double-put
vfio/pci: Add a helper to look up PFNs for DMABUFs
vfio/pci: Add a helper to create a DMABUF for a BAR-map VMA
vfio/pci: Convert BAR mmap() to use a DMABUF
vfio/pci: Provide a user-facing name for BAR mappings
vfio/pci: Clean up BAR zap and revocation
vfio/pci: Support mmap() of a VFIO DMABUF
vfio/pci: Permanently revoke a DMABUF on request
vfio/pci: Add mmap() attributes to DMABUF feature
drivers/vfio/pci/Kconfig | 3 +-
drivers/vfio/pci/Makefile | 3 +-
drivers/vfio/pci/nvgrace-gpu/main.c | 5 +
drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c | 30 +-
drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c | 224 ++++++++++---
drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c | 500 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_priv.h | 49 ++-
include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h | 1 +
include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 42 ++-
9 files changed, 690 insertions(+), 167 deletions(-)
--
2.47.3
How Can I Recover My Lost Cryptocurrency, Hire Ghost Mystery Recovery Hacker
Ghost Mystery Recovery Hacker delivered an excellent experience when I needed help recovering something I thought was permanently lost. From the start, their communication was clear, professional, and reassuring, which immediately made me feel more confident about the process. They took the time to understand my situation and explained each step in a way that was honest and easy to follow.
What stood out most was their consistency and dedication. I was kept informed throughout, and they remained patient and responsive whenever I had questions. Their expertise was evident in the way they handled everything carefully and efficiently, without creating false expectations.The outcome exceeded what I had hoped for. They were able to successfully resolve my issue, which brought me a great sense of relief. It’s not often you come across a service that combines professionalism, transparency, and results so well.
I would strongly recommend Ghost Mystery Recovery Hacker to anyone looking for reliable recovery support. Their commitment to helping clients and delivering real results truly sets them apart.
Email address: support@ ghostmysteryrecovery. c om
WhatsApp on (+44) 7480 061765
Website; ghostmysteryrecovery. c om
How Can I Recover My Lost Cryptocurrency, Hire Ghost Mystery Recovery Hacker
Ghost Mystery Recovery Hacker delivered an excellent experience when I needed help recovering something I thought was permanently lost. From the start, their communication was clear, professional, and reassuring, which immediately made me feel more confident about the process. They took the time to understand my situation and explained each step in a way that was honest and easy to follow.
What stood out most was their consistency and dedication. I was kept informed throughout, and they remained patient and responsive whenever I had questions. Their expertise was evident in the way they handled everything carefully and efficiently, without creating false expectations.The outcome exceeded what I had hoped for. They were able to successfully resolve my issue, which brought me a great sense of relief. It’s not often you come across a service that combines professionalism, transparency, and results so well.
I would strongly recommend Ghost Mystery Recovery Hacker to anyone looking for reliable recovery support. Their commitment to helping clients and delivering real results truly sets them apart.
Email address: support@ ghostmysteryrecovery. c om
WhatsApp on (+44) 7480 061765
Website; ghostmysteryrecovery. c om