Linaro-mm-sig

linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org

80 participants
6257 discussions

Bake Your Way to Billions: A Look at the Addictive World of Store Management Games

by hot.meerkat.lloh＠hidingmail.net

Ever dreamed of running your own bustling enterprise, watching your profits soar, and building an empire from humble beginnings? If so, you've likely stumbled upon the fascinating and surprisingly addictive world of store management games. These titles offer a unique blend of strategy, incremental growth, and the satisfying feeling of seeing your hard work pay off. And when it comes to the purest, most delightful form of this genre, one game stands out: https://cookieclickers.io/ The Sweet Simplicity of Cookie Clicker: A Gateway to Management At its heart, Cookie Clicker is incredibly simple. You start with a single, humble cookie, and your goal is to click it to generate more cookies. These initial clicks are crucial, as they fund your first upgrades. Soon, you’ll be able to purchase "grandmas," who automatically bake cookies for you, freeing up your clicking finger. From there, the sky's the limit! You'll acquire farms, factories, mines, and even portals to other dimensions, all dedicated to the singular purpose of baking more and more cookies. What makes Cookie Clicker so captivating is its elegant progression system. Each new upgrade and building provides a tangible boost to your cookie production, creating a satisfying feedback loop. The numbers on your screen grow exponentially, transforming from humble dozens to mind-boggling septillions and beyond. It’s a masterclass in incremental design, making every new purchase feel impactful and exciting. Beyond the Click: Strategic Thinking and Exponential Growth While the initial appeal of Cookie Clicker might be the simple act of clicking, true mastery lies in strategic decision-making. As your cookie empire expands, you'll be faced with choices: Upgrade Prioritization: Should you invest in another Grandma, a new farm, or a powerful upgrade that boosts all your existing structures? Understanding the cost-benefit analysis of each option is key. Synergies: Many upgrades have synergistic effects, meaning they become more powerful when paired with specific buildings. Discovering these combinations is a delightful puzzle. Ascension and Prestige: Eventually, you’ll unlock the ability to “ascend,” resetting your game but granting you powerful "heavenly chips" that provide permanent bonuses. This meta-progression adds a whole new layer of long-term strategy, encouraging you to rethink your approach with each new playthrough. These elements elevate Cookie Clicker from a simple clicking game to a genuinely engaging management simulation. It teaches you about exponential growth, compound interest (in a fun, cookie-filled way!), and the satisfaction of building something from nothing. Tips for Aspiring Cookie Tycoons If you’re ready to dive into the sweet, sweet world of Cookie Clicker, here are a few friendly tips to get you started: Don't Be Afraid to Click! In the early game, your clicks are your most valuable resource. Keep that finger moving! Invest in Grandmas Early: They're your first step towards automation and a steady cookie income. Always Buy Upgrades: The small boosts they provide add up quickly and are often more cost-effective than new buildings in the short term. Look for Golden Cookies: These appear randomly and offer temporary, powerful buffs. Clicking them can drastically boost your production! Consider Ascending: While it seems daunting to reset your progress, the permanent bonuses you gain make future runs much faster and more efficient. The Endless Appeal of Automation Cookie Clicker, and store management games in general, tap into a fundamental human desire: the joy of creation and the satisfaction of watching systems work efficiently. There's a particular kind of quiet pleasure in setting up a well-oiled machine and observing its output multiply. So, if you're looking for a game that's easy to pick up, surprisingly deep, and immensely satisfying, give Cookie Clicker a try. You might just find yourself baking billions before you know it!

12 hours, 35 minutes

Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: heaps: use max3() in dma_heap_ioctl

by T.J. Mercier

On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 10:26 AM Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum(a)linux.dev> wrote: > > Replace two nested max() calls with a single max3() in dma_heap_ioctl(). > > Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum(a)linux.dev> > --- > drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c > index ac5f8685a649..52eec2ebb2e8 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c > +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c > @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ static long dma_heap_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int ucmd, > in_size = 0; > if ((ucmd & kcmd & IOC_OUT) == 0) > out_size = 0; > - ksize = max(max(in_size, out_size), drv_size); > + ksize = max3(in_size, out_size, drv_size); Hi, Could you add #include <linux/minmax.h> as well? It's currently missing. With that: Reviewed-by: T.J.Mercier <tjmercier(a)google.com> Thanks, T.J.

22 hours, 52 minutes

[PATCH v12 0/5] Rust bindings for gem shmem

by Lyude Paul

Most of this patch series has already been pushed upstream, this is just the second half of the patch series that has not been pushed yet + some additional changes which were required to implement changes requested by the mailing list. This patch series is originally from Asahi, previously posted by Daniel Almeida. The previous version of the patch series can be found here: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/164580/ Branch with patches applied available here sure this builds: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lyudess/linux/-/commits/rust/gem-shmem This patch series applies on top of drm-rust-next Lyude Paul (5): rust: drm: gem: s/device::Device/Device/ for shmem.rs drm/gem/shmem: Introduce __drm_gem_shmem_free_sgt_locked() drm/gem/shmem: Export drm_gem_shmem_get_pages_sgt_locked() rust: drm: gem: Introduce shmem::SGTable rust: drm: gem: Add vmap functions to shmem bindings drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c | 48 ++- include/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.h | 2 + rust/kernel/drm/gem/shmem.rs | 557 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 593 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) base-commit: a7a080bb4236ebe577b6776d940d1717912ff6dd -- 2.53.0

23 hours, 2 minutes

[PATCH V13 0/7] Rust support for powerpc

by Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya (IBM)

Enable experimental rust support for ppc64le and ppc32be. The patch for ppc32 has been provided by Link Mauve[1] and ppc64le support[2] has been merged over it. ppc32 needs some toolchain fixes mentioned in the patch `rust: Add PowerPC support` and the discussion for that is done here[1]. This has been tested on - powernv9 hardware - pseries P11 hardware - pseries(9, 10) qemu - powernv(9, 10) qemu - rustdoc on x86 and powerpc64le - rusttest on x86 and powerpc64le We are actively working with our LLVM team to get the target for ppc, ppc64 and ppc64le in the rust compiler. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260204030507.8203-1-linkmauve@linkmauve.fr [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260204042417.83903-1-mkchauras@gmail.com Changelog: V12 -> V13: - Added a patch for fixing build issue on ppc32 by Link Mauve - Added another patch to fix a build issue in dma-buf - Added another patch to enforce minimum `rustc` version for powerpc V12: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260421120958.190430-1-mkchauras@gmail.com/ V11 -> V12: - Rebased to mainline (rust/Makefile conflict resolved) V11: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260417152253.2312961-1-mkchauras@gmail.com/ V10 -> V11: - Updated `rust/Makefile` - Not all libraries are move to `rust/host` directory now. Only proc_macro2, quote and syn are moved - Special handling for pin init is added. Details in commit - Removed mkdir for `rust/host`, this is now handled by toolchain. V10: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260406200149.3727922-1-mkchauras@gmail.com/ V9 -> V10: - rust/Makefile updated with review comments from Miguel - Patch 1/4 updated with commit message and subject V9: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260404121610.1956528-1-mkchauras@gmail.com/ V8 -> V9: - rust/Makefile updated with a directory instead of abspath V8: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260403145308.1042622-1-mkchauras@gmail.com/ V7 -> V8: - rust/Makefile updated to separate host libraries from target V7: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260329160254.2592207-1-mkchauras@gmail.com/ Changelog: V6 -> V7: - Documentation removed as powerpc is still under development - Added a fix for race condition in rust/Makefile V6: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260210090023.2587534-1-mkchauras@gmail.com V5 -> V6: - Added a missing Tested by from Venkat which got missed since V3 - Support is marked as Maintained instead of experimental V5: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260210053756.2088302-1-mkchauras@gmail.com V4 -> V5: - Removed a nested ifdef from PPC64 for Little endian toolchain V4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260209105456.1551677-1-mkchauras@gmail.com V3 -> V4: - Co-developed-by header added in patch 1 V3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260205180429.3280657-1-mkchauras@gmail.com V2 -> V3: - Splited HAVE_RUST in 2 lines - BINDGEN_TARGET_powerpc initialized before assigning the same to BINDGEN_TARGET V2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260204210125.613350-1-mkchauras@gmail.com V1 -> V2: - jump label fix for rust has been moved to a separate patch - PPC32 support has been taken - rust support has been marked experimental - target.json dependency has been removed - HAVE_RUST now depends on CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN for PPC64 Link Mauve (2): rust: Make __udivdi3() and __umoddi3() panic rust: Add PowerPC support Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya (IBM) (5): rust: Fix "multiple candidates for rmeta dependency core" error dma-resv: Fix undefined symbol when CONFIG_DMA_SHARED_BUFFER is disabled powerpc/jump_label: adjust inline asm to be consistent rust/powerpc: Set min rustc version for powerpc powerpc: Enable Rust for ppc64le arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 2 ++ arch/powerpc/Makefile | 7 ++++ arch/powerpc/include/asm/jump_label.h | 23 ++++++------ include/linux/dma-resv.h | 2 +- rust/Makefile | 52 +++++++++++++++++---------- rust/compiler_builtins.rs | 6 ++++ scripts/min-tool-version.sh | 6 +++- 7 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) -- 2.53.0

1 day

Why Choose Block Recovery Team

by dominicmiles54＠gmail.com

With professionalism and integrity, Block Recovery Team assures that their clients get the finest possible help in retrieving their lost digital assets. With a staff of professionals dedicated to assisting individuals in navigating the recovery process, they provide 24 hour support to guarantee that customers receive timely and effective assistance when they need it the most. Testimonials from delighted clients demonstrate Block Recovery Team abilities in recovering lost digital assets, emphasizing their dedication to client satisfaction and good outcomes. NO UPFRONT FEES REQUIRED. Online presence: Block Recovery Team

1 day, 1 hour

[PATCH v5 0/4] dma-buf: heaps: Turn heaps into modules

by Maxime Ripard

Hi, The recent introduction of heaps in the optee driver [1] made possible the creation of heaps as modules. It's generally a good idea if possible, including for the already existing system and CMA heaps. The system one is pretty trivial, the CMA is now easy too with the reworks we got in 7.1-r1. Let me know what you think, Maxime 1: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20250911135007.1275833-4-jens.wiklander@l… Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard(a)kernel.org> --- Changes in v5: - Rebase on 7.1-rc1 - Add a patch to enable the heaps in arm64 defconfig - Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260331-dma-buf-heaps-as-modules-v4-0-e18fda5044… Changes in v4: - Fix compilation failure - Rework to take into account OF_RESERVED_MEM - Fix regression making the default CMA area disappear if not created through the DT - Added some documentation and comments - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260303-dma-buf-heaps-as-modules-v3-0-24344812c7… Changes in v3: - Squashed cma_get_name and cma_alloc/release patches - Fixed typo in Export dev_get_cma_area commit title - Fixed compilation failure with DMA_CMA but not OF_RESERVED_MEM - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260227-dma-buf-heaps-as-modules-v2-0-454aee7e06… Changes in v2: - Collect tags - Don't export dma_contiguous_default_area anymore, but export dev_get_cma_area instead - Mentioned that heap modules can't be removed - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260225-dma-buf-heaps-as-modules-v1-0-2109225a09… --- Maxime Ripard (4): dma-buf: heaps: Export mem_accounting parameter dma-buf: heaps: cma: Turn the heap into a module dma-buf: heaps: system: Turn the heap into a module arm64: defconfig: Enable dma-buf heaps arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 3 +++ drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c | 1 + drivers/dma-buf/heaps/Kconfig | 4 ++-- drivers/dma-buf/heaps/cma_heap.c | 3 +++ drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c | 5 +++++ 5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- base-commit: 5e9b7d093f3f77cb0af4409559e3d139babfb443 change-id: 20260225-dma-buf-heaps-as-modules-1034b3ec9f2a Best regards, -- Maxime Ripard <mripard(a)kernel.org>

1 day, 6 hours

[PATCH v5 0/2] dma-buf: heaps: system: add an option to allocate explicitly shared/decrypted memory

by Jiri Pirko

From: Jiri Pirko <jiri(a)nvidia.com> Confidential computing (CoCo) VMs/guests, such as AMD SEV and Intel TDX, run with private/encrypted memory which creates a challenge for devices that do not support DMA to it (no TDISP support). For kernel-only DMA operations, swiotlb bounce buffering provides a transparent solution by copying data through shared memory. However, the only way to get this memory into userspace is via the DMA API's dma_alloc_pages()/dma_mmap_pages() type interfaces which limits the use of the memory to a single DMA device, and is incompatible with pin_user_pages(). These limitations are particularly problematic for the RDMA subsystem which makes heavy use of pin_user_pages() and expects flexible memory usage between many different DMA devices. This patch series enables userspace to explicitly request shared (decrypted) memory allocations from new dma-buf system_cc_shared heap. Userspace can mmap this memory and pass the dma-buf fd to other existing importers such as RDMA or DRM devices to access the memory. The DMA API is improved to allow the dma heap exporter to DMA map the shared memory to each importing device. Based on dma-mapping-for-next e7442a68cd1ee797b585f045d348781e9c0dde0d Jiri Pirko (2): dma-mapping: introduce DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED for shared memory dma-buf: heaps: system: add system_cc_shared heap for explicitly shared memory drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 10 +++ include/trace/events/dma.h | 3 +- kernel/dma/direct.h | 14 +++- kernel/dma/mapping.c | 13 +++- 5 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) -- 2.51.1

2 days, 3 hours

[PATCH 0/9] vfio/pci: Add mmap() for DMABUFs

by Matt Evans

Hi all, This series is based on previous RFCs/discussions: Tech topic: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20250918214425.2677057-1-amastro@fb.com/ RFCv1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260226202211.929005-1-mattev@meta.com/ RFCv2: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20260312184613.3710705-1-mattev@meta.com/ The background/rationale is covered in more detail in the RFC cover letters. The TL;DR is: The goal is to enable userspace driver designs that use VFIO to export DMABUFs representing subsets of PCI device BARs, and "vend" those buffers from a primary process to other subordinate processes by fd. These processes then mmap() the buffers and their access to the device is isolated to the exported ranges. This is an improvement on sharing the VFIO device fd to subordinate processes, which would allow unfettered access . This is achieved by enabling mmap() of vfio-pci DMABUFs. Second, a new ioctl()-based revocation mechanism is added to allow the primary process to forcibly revoke access to previously-shared BAR spans, even if the subordinate processes haven't cleanly exited. (The related topic of safe delegation of iommufd control to the subordinate processes is not addressed here, and is follow-up work.) As well as isolation and revocation, another advantage to accessing a BAR through a VMA backed by a DMABUF is that it's straightforward to create the buffer with access attributes, such as write-combining. Notes on patches ================ Feedback from the RFCs requested that, instead of creating DMABUF-specific vm_ops and .fault paths, to go the whole way and migrate the existing VFIO PCI BAR mmap() to be backed by a DMABUF too, resulting in a common vm_ops and fault handler for mmap()s of both the VFIO device and explicitly-exported DMABUFs. This has been done for vfio-pci, but not sub-drivers (nvgrace-gpu's special-case mappings are unchanged). vfio/pci: Fix vfio_pci_dma_buf_cleanup() double-put A bug fix to a related are, whose context is a depdency for later patches. vfio/pci: Add a helper to look up PFNs for DMABUFs vfio/pci: Add a helper to create a DMABUF for a BAR-map VMA The first is for a DMABUF VMA fault handler to determine arbitrary-sized PFNs from ranges in DMABUF. Secondly, refactor DMABUF export for use by the existing export feature and a new helper that creates a DMABUF corresponding to a VFIO BAR mmap() request. vfio/pci: Convert BAR mmap() to use a DMABUF The vfio-pci core mmap() creates a DMABUF with the helper, and the vm_ops fault handler uses the other helper to resolve the fault. Because this depends on DMABUF structs/code, CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_CORE needs to depend on CONFIG_DMA_SHARED_BUFFER. The CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_DMABUF still conditionally enables the export support code. NOTE: The user mmap()s a device fd, but the resulting VMA's vm_file becomes that of the DMABUF which takes ownership of the device and puts it on release. This maintains the existing behaviour of a VMA keeping the VFIO device open. BAR zapping then happens via the existing vfio_pci_dma_buf_move() path, which now needs to unmap PTEs in the DMABUF's address_space. vfio/pci: Provide a user-facing name for BAR mappings There was a request for decent debug naming in /proc/<pid>/maps etc. comparable to the existing VFIO names: since the VMAs are DMABUFs, they have a "dmabuf:" prefix and can't be 100% identical to before. This is a user-visible change, but this patch at least now gives us extra info on the BDF & BAR being mapped. vfio/pci: Clean up BAR zap and revocation In general (see NOTE!) the vfio_pci_zap_bars() is now obsolete, since it unmaps PTEs in the VFIO device address_space which is now unused. This consolidates all calls (e.g. around reset) with the neighbouring vfio_pci_dma_buf_move()s into new functions, to revoke-zap/unrevoke. NOTE: the nvgrace-gpu driver continues to use its own private vm_ops, fault handler, etc. for its special memregions, and these DO still add PTEs to the VFIO device address_space. So, a temporary flag, vdev->bar_needs_zap, maintains the old behaviour for this use. At least this patch's consolidation makes it easy to remove the remaining zap when this need goes away. A FIXME is added: if nvgrace-gpu is converted to DMABUFs, remove the flag and final zap. vfio/pci: Support mmap() of a VFIO DMABUF Adds mmap() for a DMABUF fd exported from vfio-pci. It was a goal to keep the VFIO device fd lifetime behaviour unchanged with respect to the DMABUFs. An application can close all device fds, and this will revoke/clean up all DMABUFs; no mappings or other access can be performed now. When enabling mmap() of the DMABUFs, this means access through the VMA is also revoked. This complicates the fault handler because whilst the DMABUF exists, it has no guarantee that the corresponding VFIO device is still alive. Adds synchronisation ensuring the vdev is available before vdev->memory_lock is touched. (I decided against the alternative of preventing cleanup by holding the VFIO device open if any DMABUFs exist, because it's both a change of behaviour and less clean overall.) I've added a chonky comment in place, happy to clarify more if you have ideas. vfio/pci: Permanently revoke a DMABUF on request By weight, this is mostly a rename of revoked to an enum, status. There are now 3 states for a buffer, usable and revoked temporary/permanent. A new VFIO device ioctl is added, VFIO_DEVICE_PCI_DMABUF_REVOKE, which passes a DMABUF (exported from that device) and permanently revokes it. Thus a userspace driver can guarantee any downstream consumers of a shared fd are prevented from accessing a BAR range, and that range can be reused. The code doing revocation in vfio_pci_dma_buf_move() is moved, unchanged, to a common function for use by _move() and the new ioctl path. Q: I can't think of a good reason to temporarily revoke/unrevoke buffers from userspace, so didn't add a 'flags' field to the ioctl struct. Easy to add if people think it's worthwhile for future use. vfio/pci: Add mmap() attributes to DMABUF feature Reserves bits [31:28] in vfio_device_feature_dma_buf to allow a (CPU) mapping attribute to be specified for an exported set of ranges. The default is the current UC, and a new flag can specify CPU access as WC. Q: I've taken 4 bits; the intention is for this field to be a scalar not a bitmap (i.e. mutually-exclusive access properties). Perhaps 4 is a bit too many? Testing ======= (The [RFC ONLY] userspace test program, for QEMU edu-plus, has been dropped, but can be found in the GitHub branch below.) This code has been tested in mapping DMABUFs of single/multiple ranges, aliasing mmap()s, aliasing ranges across DMABUFs, vm_pgoff > 0, revocation, shutdown/cleanup scenarios, and hugepage mappings seem to work correctly. I've lightly tested WC mappings also (by observing resulting PTEs as having the correct attributes...). No regressions observed on the VFIO selftests, or on our internal vfio-pci applications. End === This is based on -next (next-20260414 but will merge earlier), as it depends on Leon's series "vfio: Wait for dma-buf invalidation to complete": https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20260205-nocturnal-poetic-chamois-f566a… These commits are on GitHub, along with "[RFC ONLY] selftests: vfio: Add standalone vfio_dmabuf_mmap_test": https://github.com/metamev/linux/compare/next-20260414...metamev:linux:dev/… Thanks for reading, Matt ================================================================================ Change log: v1: - Cleanup of the common DMABUF-aware VMA vm_ops fault handler and export code. - Fixed a lot of races, particularly faults racing with DMABUF cleanup (if the VFIO device fds close, for example). - Added nicer human-readable names for VFIO mmap() VMAs RFCv2: Respin based on the feedback/suggestions: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20260312184613.3710705-1-mattev@meta.com/ - Transform the existing VFIO BAR mmap path to also use DMABUFs behind the scenes, and then simply share that code for explicitly-mapped DMABUFs. Jason wanted to go that direction to enable iommufd VFIO type 1 emulation to pick up a DMABUF for an IO mapping. - Revoke buffers using a VFIO device fd ioctl RFCv1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260226202211.929005-1-mattev@meta.com/ Matt Evans (9): vfio/pci: Fix vfio_pci_dma_buf_cleanup() double-put vfio/pci: Add a helper to look up PFNs for DMABUFs vfio/pci: Add a helper to create a DMABUF for a BAR-map VMA vfio/pci: Convert BAR mmap() to use a DMABUF vfio/pci: Provide a user-facing name for BAR mappings vfio/pci: Clean up BAR zap and revocation vfio/pci: Support mmap() of a VFIO DMABUF vfio/pci: Permanently revoke a DMABUF on request vfio/pci: Add mmap() attributes to DMABUF feature drivers/vfio/pci/Kconfig | 3 +- drivers/vfio/pci/Makefile | 3 +- drivers/vfio/pci/nvgrace-gpu/main.c | 5 + drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c | 30 +- drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c | 224 ++++++++++--- drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c | 500 +++++++++++++++++++++++----- drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_priv.h | 49 ++- include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h | 1 + include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 42 ++- 9 files changed, 690 insertions(+), 167 deletions(-) -- 2.47.3

2 days, 5 hours

(no subject)

by Alex Morgan

How Can I Recover My Lost Cryptocurrency, Hire Ghost Mystery Recovery Hacker Ghost Mystery Recovery Hacker delivered an excellent experience when I needed help recovering something I thought was permanently lost. From the start, their communication was clear, professional, and reassuring, which immediately made me feel more confident about the process. They took the time to understand my situation and explained each step in a way that was honest and easy to follow. What stood out most was their consistency and dedication. I was kept informed throughout, and they remained patient and responsive whenever I had questions. Their expertise was evident in the way they handled everything carefully and efficiently, without creating false expectations.The outcome exceeded what I had hoped for. They were able to successfully resolve my issue, which brought me a great sense of relief. It’s not often you come across a service that combines professionalism, transparency, and results so well. I would strongly recommend Ghost Mystery Recovery Hacker to anyone looking for reliable recovery support. Their commitment to helping clients and delivering real results truly sets them apart. Email address: support@ ghostmysteryrecovery. c om WhatsApp on (+44) 7480 061765 Website; ghostmysteryrecovery. c om

3 days, 18 hours

(no subject)

by Alex Morgan

3 days, 18 hours

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

Linaro-mm-sig