Hi Tvrtko,

On 4/1/24 10:21, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:

On 01/04/2024 13:45, Christian König wrote:

...

Am 01.04.24 um 14:39 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin:

...

On 29/03/2024 00:00, T.J. Mercier wrote:

...

On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 7:53 AM Tvrtko Ursulin tursulin@igalia.com wrote:

...

From: Tvrtko Ursulin tursulin@ursulin.net

There is no point in compiling in the list and mutex operations which are only used from the dma-buf debugfs code, if debugfs is not compiled in.

Put the code in questions behind some kconfig guards and so save some text and maybe even a pointer per object at runtime when not enabled.

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin tursulin@ursulin.net

Reviewed-by: T.J. Mercier tjmercier@google.com

Thanks!

How would patches to dma-buf be typically landed? Via what tree I mean? drm-misc-next?

That should go through drm-misc-next.

And feel free to add Reviewed-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com as well.

Thanks!

Maarten if I got it right you are handling the next drm-misc-next pull - could you merge this one please?

Applied to drm-misc/drm-misc-next!

Best Regards, - Maíra

Regards,

Tvrtko