We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1: drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c:87:23: warning: no previous prototype for 'sync_timeline_create' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static. So this patch marks it 'static'.
Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie baoyou.xie@linaro.org --- drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c b/drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c index 62e8e6d..6f16c85 100644 --- a/drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static inline struct sync_pt *fence_to_sync_pt(struct fence *fence) * Creates a new sync_timeline. Returns the sync_timeline object or NULL in * case of error. */ -struct sync_timeline *sync_timeline_create(const char *name) +static struct sync_timeline *sync_timeline_create(const char *name) { struct sync_timeline *obj;
2016-09-18 Baoyou Xie baoyou.xie@linaro.org:
We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1: drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c:87:23: warning: no previous prototype for 'sync_timeline_create' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static. So this patch marks it 'static'.
Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie baoyou.xie@linaro.org
drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Thanks for finding this.
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk
Gustavo
Hi Baoyou,
On 20 September 2016 at 16:43, Gustavo Padovan gustavo@padovan.org wrote:
2016-09-18 Baoyou Xie baoyou.xie@linaro.org:
We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1: drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c:87:23: warning: no previous prototype for 'sync_timeline_create' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static. So this patch marks it 'static'.
Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie baoyou.xie@linaro.org
drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Thanks for finding this.
Thanks for the patch; this doesn't apply to mainline yet, since the de-staging of sw_sync code is queued for 4.9 via Greg-KH's tree. CC'ing him.
Greg, would it be possible to please take this via your tree?
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk
Acked-by: Sumit Semwal sumit.semwal@linaro.org
Gustavo
Best regards, Sumi
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 06:23:33PM +0530, Sumit Semwal wrote:
Hi Baoyou,
On 20 September 2016 at 16:43, Gustavo Padovan gustavo@padovan.org wrote:
2016-09-18 Baoyou Xie baoyou.xie@linaro.org:
We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1: drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c:87:23: warning: no previous prototype for 'sync_timeline_create' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static. So this patch marks it 'static'.
Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie baoyou.xie@linaro.org
drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Thanks for finding this.
Thanks for the patch; this doesn't apply to mainline yet, since the de-staging of sw_sync code is queued for 4.9 via Greg-KH's tree. CC'ing him.
Greg, would it be possible to please take this via your tree?
If someone resends it to me with the needed acks and reviewed-by, I will.
thanks,
greg k-h
Hi Baoyou,
2016-09-22 Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 06:23:33PM +0530, Sumit Semwal wrote:
Hi Baoyou,
On 20 September 2016 at 16:43, Gustavo Padovan gustavo@padovan.org wrote:
2016-09-18 Baoyou Xie baoyou.xie@linaro.org:
We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1: drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c:87:23: warning: no previous prototype for 'sync_timeline_create' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static. So this patch marks it 'static'.
Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie baoyou.xie@linaro.org
drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Thanks for finding this.
Thanks for the patch; this doesn't apply to mainline yet, since the de-staging of sw_sync code is queued for 4.9 via Greg-KH's tree. CC'ing him.
Greg, would it be possible to please take this via your tree?
If someone resends it to me with the needed acks and reviewed-by, I will.
Could please resend this to Greg with all the acks and reviewed-by in the commit message? Thanks.
Gustavo
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org