On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 04:43:16PM +0100, Matt Evans wrote:
Add vfio_pci_dma_buf_find_pfn(), which a VMA fault handler can use to find a PFN.
This supports multi-range DMABUFs, which typically would be used to represent scattered spans but might even represent overlapping or aliasing spans of PFNs.
Because this is intended to be used in vfio_pci_core.c, we also need to expose the struct vfio_pci_dma_buf in the vfio_pci_priv.h header.
Signed-off-by: Matt Evans matt@ozlabs.org
drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_priv.h | 20 +++++ 2 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c index c16f460c01d6..9e5e865f6fb6 100644 --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c @@ -9,19 +9,6 @@ MODULE_IMPORT_NS("DMA_BUF"); -struct vfio_pci_dma_buf {
- struct dma_buf *dmabuf;
- struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev;
- struct list_head dmabufs_elm;
- size_t size;
- struct phys_vec *phys_vec;
- struct p2pdma_provider *provider;
- u32 nr_ranges;
- struct kref kref;
- struct completion comp;
- u8 revoked : 1;
-};
static int vfio_pci_dma_buf_attach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct dma_buf_attachment *attachment) { @@ -106,6 +93,130 @@ static const struct dma_buf_ops vfio_pci_dmabuf_ops = { .release = vfio_pci_dma_buf_release, }; +int vfio_pci_dma_buf_find_pfn(struct vfio_pci_dma_buf *priv,
struct vm_area_struct *vma,unsigned long address,
Nit: s/address/fault_addr ?
unsigned int order,unsigned long *out_pfn)+{
- /*
* Given a VMA (start, end, pgoffs) and a fault address,* search the corresponding DMABUF's phys_vec[] to find the* range representing the address's offset into the VMA, and* its PFN.** The phys_vec[] ranges represent contiguous spans of VAs* upwards from the buffer offset 0; the actual PFNs might be* in any order, overlap/alias, etc. Calculate an offset of* the desired page given VMA start/pgoff and address, then* search upwards from 0 to find which span contains it.** On success, a valid PFN for a page sized by 'order' is* returned into out_pfn.** Failure occurs if:* - The page would cross the edge of the VMA* - The page isn't entirely contained within a range* - We find a range, but the final PFN isn't aligned to the* requested order.** (Upon failure, the caller is expected to try again with a* smaller order; the tests above will always succeed for* order=0 as the limit case.)** It's suboptimal if DMABUFs are created with neigbouring* ranges that are physically contiguous, since hugepages* can't straddle range boundaries. (The construction of the* ranges vector should merge such ranges.)** Finally, vma_pgoff_adjust is used for a DMABUF representing* a VFIO BAR mmap, which is created from the start of the* offset region.*/- const unsigned long pagesize = PAGE_SIZE << order;
- unsigned long vma_off = ((vma->vm_pgoff - priv->vma_pgoff_adjust) <<
PAGE_SHIFT) & VFIO_PCI_OFFSET_MASK;- unsigned long rounded_page_addr = ALIGN_DOWN(address, pagesize);
- unsigned long rounded_page_end = rounded_page_addr + pagesize;
- unsigned long page_buf_offset;
- unsigned long page_buf_offset_end;
- unsigned long range_buf_offset = 0;
- unsigned int i;
- if (rounded_page_addr < vma->vm_start || rounded_page_end > vma->vm_end) {
if (order > 0)return -EAGAIN;/* A fault address outside of the VMA is absurd. */WARN(1, "Fault addr 0x%lx outside VMA 0x%lx-0x%lx\n",address, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end);
This could flood dmesg if triggered repeatedly by userspace :( Since a fault outside the VMA is an invalid access that already results in a SIGBUS, we could probably avoid the WARN here? Perhaps pr_warn_ratelimited() should suffice?
return -EFAULT;- }
- /*
* page_buff_offset[_end] is the span of DMABUF offsets* corresponding to the faulting page:*/- if (unlikely(check_add_overflow(rounded_page_addr - vma->vm_start,
vma_off, &page_buf_offset) ||check_add_overflow(page_buf_offset, pagesize,&page_buf_offset_end)))return -EFAULT;- for (i = 0; i < priv->nr_ranges; i++) {
size_t range_len = priv->phys_vec[i].len;phys_addr_t range_start = priv->phys_vec[i].paddr;/** If the current range starts after the page's span,* this and any future range won't match. Bail early.*/if (page_buf_offset_end <= range_buf_offset)break;if (page_buf_offset >= range_buf_offset &&page_buf_offset_end <= range_buf_offset + range_len) {/** The faulting page is wholly contained* within the span represented by the range.* Validate PFN alignment for the order:*/unsigned long pfn = (range_start + page_buf_offset -range_buf_offset) / PAGE_SIZE;
Minor nit: I'm aware that decent compilers convert pow(2) divides to >> However, we seem to be using `>> PAGE_SHIFT` across vfio-pci. E.g.:
return (pci_resource_start(vdev->pdev, index) >> PAGE_SHIFT) + pgoff; unsigned long pgoff = (addr - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
Let's consider using the same pattern?
if (IS_ALIGNED(pfn, 1 << order)) {*out_pfn = pfn;return 0;}/* Retry with smaller order */return -EAGAIN;}range_buf_offset += range_len;- }
- /*
* A hugepage straddling a range boundary will fail to match a* range, but the address will (eventually) match when retried* with a smaller page.*/- if (order > 0)
return -EAGAIN;- /*
* If we get here, the address fell outside of the span* represented by the (concatenated) ranges. Setup of a
Nit: double space before "Setup" and "But" below.
* mapping must ensure that the VMA is <= the total size of* the ranges, so this should never happen. But, if it does,* force SIGBUS for the access and warn.*/- WARN_ONCE(1, "No range for addr 0x%lx, order %d: VMA 0x%lx-0x%lx pgoff 0x%lx, %u ranges, size 0x%zx\n",
address, order, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end, vma->vm_pgoff,priv->nr_ranges, priv->size);- return -EFAULT;
The fall-through logic at the end feels a bit redundant.
If we've exhausted the phys_vec list without finding a match, returning -EAGAIN for order > 0 seems like the correct fallback behavior.
However, the subsequent WARN_ONCE for the order == 0 seems unnecessary? An out-of-bounds access is an error that should simply return -EFAULT (converting to SIGBUS) without polluting the kernel log with stackdumps? Can we instead convert this to a pr_warn or something? Something like:
ret = order ? -EAGAIN : -EFAULT;
if (ret == -EFAULT) pr_warn_ratelimited("No range for addr 0x%lx...\n", address);
return ret;
(with appropriate comments)
Thanks, Praan
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org