Hi Tao,
Apologies for the late reply - this patch fell through the cracks.
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 05:29:37PM +0800, Tao Zhang wrote:
The input parameter of the function pm_runtime_put should be the same in the function cti_enable_hw and cti_disable_hw. The correct parameter to use here should be dev->parent.
Signed-off-by: Tao Zhang quic_taozha@quicinc.com
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-core.c index e2a3620..8988b2e 100644 --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-core.c +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cti-core.c @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static int cti_disable_hw(struct cti_drvdata *drvdata) coresight_disclaim_device_unlocked(csdev); CS_LOCK(drvdata->base); spin_unlock(&drvdata->spinlock);
- pm_runtime_put(dev);
- pm_runtime_put(dev->parent);
You are correct - I have added this patch to my next tree.
Thanks, Mathieu
return 0; /* not disabled this call */ -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project