On Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:04:24 -0700 Bobby Eshleman wrote:

On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 11:09:03AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:

...

On Wed, 08 Jul 2026 15:55:06 -0700 Bobby Eshleman wrote:

...

+@ksft_disruptive +def check_rx_large_niov(cfg) -> None:

• """Run the devmem RX test with rx-buf-size = 16 KiB."""
• run_rx_large_niov(cfg)

Any idea why the devmem tests sprinkle disruptive everywhere? Disruptive means we take the link down, I don't think this test does that.

Talked to Stan and he mentioned the original idea was not necessarily just for link down, but any test that could be considered disruptive to other tests, with the idea to eventually introduce some scheduling (postpone disruptive until the end).

Perhaps have such conversations on the list? IDK what Stan has in mind.

If we can get common agreement on its meaning, maybe I could submit something into the documentation and update where its misused?

I'll drop it from this patch since it doesn't bring down the link (and seemingly no worries about check_rx_hds() tests not having it).