On 9/12/26 00:11, Karl Mehltretter wrote:

The kernel-doc comment of dma_fence_is_signaled_locked() refers to dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling, which was renamed to dma_fence_enable_signaling by commit 9370a5c664e8 ("dma-buf: rename dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling"). Say dma_fence_enable_signaling.

Fixes: 9370a5c664e8 ("dma-buf: rename dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling") Assisted-by: LLM Signed-off-by: Karl Mehltretter kmehltretter@gmail.com

I'm really wondering why that was not automatically renamed.

Anyway reviewed and pushed to drm-misc-next.

Thanks, Christian.

---

include/linux/dma-fence.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence.h b/include/linux/dma-fence.h index 158cd609f1036e56668867f092041213cbf30427..3aa85be43aada5a80ea2e1cecc5f76824b434d14 100644 --- a/include/linux/dma-fence.h +++ b/include/linux/dma-fence.h @@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ dma_fence_test_signaled_flag(struct dma_fence *fence)

• Returns true if the fence was already signaled, false if not. Since this
• function doesn't enable signaling, it is not guaranteed to ever return
• true if dma_fence_add_callback(), dma_fence_wait() or

• • dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling() haven't been called before.

• • dma_fence_enable_signaling() haven't been called before.
  • This function requires &dma_fence.lock to be held.