In the function amdgpu_uvd_cs_msg(), every branch in the switch statement will have a return, so the code below the switch statement will not be executed.
Eliminate the follow smatch warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c:845 amdgpu_uvd_cs_msg() warn: ignoring unreachable code.
Reported-by: Abaci Robot abaci@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com --- Changes in v2: -For the follow advice: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1435968/
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c index c6dbc08..35f6874 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c @@ -829,9 +829,8 @@ static int amdgpu_uvd_cs_msg(struct amdgpu_uvd_cs_ctx *ctx,
default: DRM_ERROR("Illegal UVD message type (%d)!\n", msg_type); - return -EINVAL; } - BUG(); + return -EINVAL; }
Am 28.05.21 um 11:29 schrieb Jiapeng Chong:
In the function amdgpu_uvd_cs_msg(), every branch in the switch statement will have a return, so the code below the switch statement will not be executed.
Eliminate the follow smatch warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c:845 amdgpu_uvd_cs_msg() warn: ignoring unreachable code.
Reported-by: Abaci Robot abaci@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com
Reviewed-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com
Changes in v2: -For the follow advice: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1435968/
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c index c6dbc08..35f6874 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c @@ -829,9 +829,8 @@ static int amdgpu_uvd_cs_msg(struct amdgpu_uvd_cs_ctx *ctx, default: DRM_ERROR("Illegal UVD message type (%d)!\n", msg_type);
return -EINVAL;- BUG();
- return -EINVAL; }
Applied. Thanks!
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 8:18 AM Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com wrote:
Am 28.05.21 um 11:29 schrieb Jiapeng Chong:
In the function amdgpu_uvd_cs_msg(), every branch in the switch statement will have a return, so the code below the switch statement will not be executed.
Eliminate the follow smatch warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c:845 amdgpu_uvd_cs_msg() warn: ignoring unreachable code.
Reported-by: Abaci Robot abaci@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com
Reviewed-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com
Changes in v2: -For the follow advice: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1435968/
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c index c6dbc08..35f6874 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c @@ -829,9 +829,8 @@ static int amdgpu_uvd_cs_msg(struct amdgpu_uvd_cs_ctx *ctx,
default: DRM_ERROR("Illegal UVD message type (%d)!\n", msg_type);
return -EINVAL; }BUG();
return -EINVAL;
amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
-
Alex Deucher -
Christian König -
Jiapeng Chong