With commit 72b6ede73623 ("dma-buf.rst: Document why indefinite fences are a bad idea"), document generation warns:
Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst:182: \ WARNING: Title underline too short.
Repair length of title underline to remove warning.
Fixes: 72b6ede73623 ("dma-buf.rst: Document why indefinite fences are a bad idea") Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com --- Daniel, please pick this minor non-urgent fix to your new documentation.
Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst index 100bfd227265..13ea0cc0a3fa 100644 --- a/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ DMA Fence uABI/Sync File :internal:
Indefinite DMA Fences -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
At various times &dma_fence with an indefinite time until dma_fence_wait() finishes have been proposed. Examples include:
Am 09.08.20 um 08:17 schrieb Lukas Bulwahn:
With commit 72b6ede73623 ("dma-buf.rst: Document why indefinite fences are a bad idea"), document generation warns:
Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst:182: \ WARNING: Title underline too short.
Repair length of title underline to remove warning.
Fixes: 72b6ede73623 ("dma-buf.rst: Document why indefinite fences are a bad idea") Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com
Acked-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com
Should I pick it up into drm-misc-next?
Daniel, please pick this minor non-urgent fix to your new documentation.
Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst index 100bfd227265..13ea0cc0a3fa 100644 --- a/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ DMA Fence uABI/Sync File :internal: Indefinite DMA Fences -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ At various times &dma_fence with an indefinite time until dma_fence_wait() finishes have been proposed. Examples include:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 01:25:40PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Am 09.08.20 um 08:17 schrieb Lukas Bulwahn:
With commit 72b6ede73623 ("dma-buf.rst: Document why indefinite fences are a bad idea"), document generation warns:
Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst:182: \ WARNING: Title underline too short.
Repair length of title underline to remove warning.
Fixes: 72b6ede73623 ("dma-buf.rst: Document why indefinite fences are a bad idea") Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com
Acked-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com
Should I pick it up into drm-misc-next?
Yes please. For the future if you need to check if someone has commit rights and can push themselves:
https://people.freedesktop.org/~seanpaul/whomisc.html
Yeah with gitlab this would all be a bit more reasonable, but we get by meanwhile :-)
Cheers, Daniel
Daniel, please pick this minor non-urgent fix to your new documentation.
Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst index 100bfd227265..13ea0cc0a3fa 100644 --- a/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ DMA Fence uABI/Sync File :internal: Indefinite DMA Fences -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ At various times &dma_fence with an indefinite time until dma_fence_wait() finishes have been proposed. Examples include:
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
-
Christian König -
Daniel Vetter -
Lukas Bulwahn