Hi everyone,
Since cross-distribution meetings at Linaro Connect have been popular, we are continuing the tradition and having a session[1] in Linaro Connect next week.
https://hkg15.pathable.com/meetings/250818
The event is on Wednesday 11 February, 14.00 hong kong time (06.00 UTC). We'll try to get session broadcasted on google hangouts for remote participation, but I don't have the link at hand yet.
If you have anything specific in your mind, feel free to reply to this mail to cross-distribution list, and I'll get it added to agenda.
Riku
On 3 February 2015 at 14:38, Riku Voipio riku.voipio@linaro.org wrote:
The event is on Wednesday 11 February, 14.00 hong kong time (06.00 UTC). We'll try to get session broadcasted on google hangouts for remote participation, but I don't have the link at hand yet.
If you have anything specific in your mind, feel free to reply to this mail to cross-distribution list, and I'll get it added to agenda.
Is it worth having one on picking a default console automatically (regardless of FDT/ACPI)?
/ Leif
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 04:19:35PM +0000, Leif Lindholm wrote:
On 3 February 2015 at 14:38, Riku Voipio riku.voipio@linaro.org wrote:
The event is on Wednesday 11 February, 14.00 hong kong time (06.00 UTC). We'll try to get session broadcasted on google hangouts for remote participation, but I don't have the link at hand yet.
If you have anything specific in your mind, feel free to reply to this mail to cross-distribution list, and I'll get it added to agenda.
Is it worth having one on picking a default console automatically (regardless of FDT/ACPI)?
... and also continuing with the existing rate/parity/whatever configuration, rather than assuming there's a PL011 at 38400 or whatever.
Spreading the message that the infrastructure now exists kernel-side to handle this in a sane manner would be beneficial.
Mark.
On 3 February 2015 at 18:34, Mark Rutland mark.rutland@arm.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 04:19:35PM +0000, Leif Lindholm wrote:
Is it worth having one on picking a default console automatically (regardless of FDT/ACPI)?
... and also continuing with the existing rate/parity/whatever configuration, rather than assuming there's a PL011 at 38400 or whatever.
Spreading the message that the infrastructure now exists kernel-side to handle this in a sane manner would be beneficial.
At least I'm very interested in knowing how it's done in the kernel side so we can enable it in the userland side.
Riku
-
Leif Lindholm -
Mark Rutland -
Riku Voipio