10 Apr
2012
10 Apr
'12
9:18 a.m.
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:36:07 +0200 Jakub Jelinek jakub@redhat.com wrote:
We really want consistency about the dynamic linker names etc. across different targets and sneaking silently multiarch paths on one architecture would make it inconsistent with all the others. So, please just use /libhf/ld-linux.so.3.
I personally find /libhf extremely ugly. If having a second path is a problem, how about using the triplet in the filename? Like:
/lib/ld-linux-arm-linux-gnueabihf.so.3
?
Unique per arch and not multiarched. And AFAIK, Linux can handle long filenames just fine...
Konstantinos