23 Apr
2013
23 Apr
'13
11:07 p.m.
Hi Christopher,
You are correct about Fedora. Fedora will likely never go "multi-arch" (although I personally find it interesting, it is seen as exotic and disfavored by most folks I speak with in the Fedora community). We have ensured AArch64 library paths are unified with other RPM distros. On LSB, I spoke with folks about LSB in SF last week. Will followup on AArch64 LSB.
Sent from a plane. Buffered until landing.
Jon.
--
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 22, 2013, at 11:42, Christopher Covington cov@codeaurora.org wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to put together a summary of what distributions have hopped on the
> Multiarch /lib/<triplet> bandwagon (or plan to), and for those who haven't,
> what their solution is to dealing with various instruction sets, system call
> interfaces, application binary interfaces, etc. on a single root filesystem.
>
> Here's what I've gathered so far. Links to up-to-date documentation on the
> subject, and any corrections or additions to my little list would be greatly
> appreciated.
>
> Ubuntu, Debian
> Multiarch: /lib/<triplet>
>
> Fedora, OpenSUSE
> Multilib A: /lib, /lib64
>
> Arch
> Multilib B: /lib32, /lib
>
> Gentoo
> Multilib C: /lib32, /lib64, /libx32
>
> OpenEmbedded
> Uniarch A: /lib
>
> Android:
> Uniarch B: /system/lib
>
> Also, any news on related LSB/FHS or other standardization efforts?
>
> Thanks,
> Christopher
>
> --
> Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
> hosted by the Linux Foundation.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cross-distro mailing list
> cross-distro@lists.linaro.org
> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-distro
>