uEnv.txt and boot.scr aren't the same thing. uEnv.txt is the U-Boot environment usually on a fat partition. boot.scr is loaded by a readily loaded environment... You either predefined your environment and boot from it or you're using values from that environment. I wouldn't use uEnv.txt to replace a boot.scr on any system..
Matt Sealey matt@genesi-usa.com Product Development Analyst, Genesi USA, Inc.
On Aug 8, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Brendan Conoboy blc@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/08/2012 11:30 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
Standardizing on boot.scr vs. raw text file for scripts would also help. Right now, ubuntu uses the former and fedora the later.
Not sure what you mean here- boot.scr vs uEnv.txt perhaps? In Fedora we use uEnv.txt where the uboot binary supports it (OMAP for instance), but otherwise boot.scr. If we were going to standardize these things I'd liek to see:
Move to uEnv.txt instead of boot.scr
Make zboot standard
Make hush shell standard
-- Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / blc@redhat.com
cross-distro mailing list cross-distro@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-distro