3 Feb
2015
3 Feb
'15
7:50 p.m.
On 3 February 2015 at 18:34, Mark Rutland mark.rutland@arm.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 04:19:35PM +0000, Leif Lindholm wrote:
Is it worth having one on picking a default console automatically (regardless of FDT/ACPI)?
... and also continuing with the existing rate/parity/whatever configuration, rather than assuming there's a PL011 at 38400 or whatever.
Spreading the message that the infrastructure now exists kernel-side to handle this in a sane manner would be beneficial.
At least I'm very interested in knowing how it's done in the kernel side so we can enable it in the userland side.
Riku