On 12/03/2021 17:16, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 12.03.21 17:53, Grant Likely wrote:
On 11/03/2021 20:06, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
[...]
+Firmware Update +---------------
+Being able to update firmware to address security issues is a key feature of secure platforms. +EBBR platforms are required to implement either an in-band or an out-of-band firmware update mechanism.
+If firmware update is performed in-band (firmware on the application processor updates itself), +then the firmware shall implement EFI_UPDATE_CAPSULE and accept updates
%s/EFI_UPDATE_CAPSULE/the UpdateCapsule() runtime service/
Is this the right way around to change this? Why doesn't it make sense to reference EFI_UPDATE_CAPSULE? The question is I suppose part of a larger question on how to refer to EFI elements throughout the document.
Throughout the UEFI spec services are referenced by there function name and not by their type.
We should opt for the way of least surprise, i.e. use the function names.
Best regards > Heinrich
Okay, makes sense. I hadn't gone back to see what was done in the UEFI spec before replying. :-) I'll make the change.
g.