linaro-dev June 2011

linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org

149 participants
196 discussions

[PATCH V2] ARM: S5P: Fix compilation error for exynos4_defconfig

by Tushar Behera

Added Kconfig entry for setup-usb-phy.c on which EHCI support is dependent on. Following the naming convention of other setup files, we have following renaming. usb-phy.c ==> setup-usb-phy.c Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera(a)linaro.org> --- arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig | 6 ++++++ arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Makefile | 2 +- .../mach-exynos4/{usb-phy.c => setup-usb-phy.c} | 0 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) rename arch/arm/mach-exynos4/{usb-phy.c => setup-usb-phy.c} (100%) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig index b92c1e5..a45a022 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig @@ -91,6 +91,11 @@ config EXYNOS4_SETUP_FIMC help Common setup code for the camera interfaces. +config EXYNOS4_SETUP_USB_PHY + bool + help + Common setup code for USB PHY controller + # machine support menu "EXYNOS4 Machines" @@ -176,6 +181,7 @@ config MACH_NURI select EXYNOS4_SETUP_I2C3 select EXYNOS4_SETUP_I2C5 select EXYNOS4_SETUP_SDHCI + select EXYNOS4_SETUP_USB_PHY select SAMSUNG_DEV_PWM help Machine support for Samsung Mobile NURI Board. diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Makefile index a9bb94f..60fe5ec 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Makefile +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Makefile @@ -56,4 +56,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS4_SETUP_KEYPAD) += setup-keypad.o obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS4_SETUP_SDHCI) += setup-sdhci.o obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS4_SETUP_SDHCI_GPIO) += setup-sdhci-gpio.o -obj-$(CONFIG_USB_SUPPORT) += usb-phy.o +obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS4_SETUP_USB_PHY) += setup-usb-phy.o diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/usb-phy.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/setup-usb-phy.c similarity index 100% rename from arch/arm/mach-exynos4/usb-phy.c rename to arch/arm/mach-exynos4/setup-usb-phy.c -- 1.7.1

13 years, 6 months

[NOTES] Linaro Developer Platform Weekly Status Meeting June 1st

by Tom Gall

Enclosed you'll find a link to the agenda, notes and actions from the Linaro Developer Platforms Weekly Status meeting held on June 1st in #linaro-meeting on irc.freenode.net at 15:00 UTC. https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/DevPlatform/Meetings/2011-06-01 New Actions: * suihkulokki and rsalveti to discuss how to work with gles packages with oneirc (update-alternatives? conflict/provide/replace? new solution?) * Dr_Who to check with help from wookey if debian is planning to package the chromium bits * aviksil to follow up SMARTT and create a wiki page giving more details about the tool, how to install and how to run it * aviksil follow up smartt with kurt to see where would be the official place to put the code and make releases * everyone, go over http://status.linaro.org/natty/linaro-foundations.html and close/postpone remaining items Carried Over Actions: * hrw and rsalveti to discuss with michaelh1 about a possible merge of BPs Regards, Tom Developer Platforms Team "We want great men who, when fortune frowns will not be discouraged." - Colonel Henry Knox w) tom.gall att linaro.org w) tom_gall att vnet.ibm.com h) tom_gall att mac.com IRC) Dr_Who, tgall_foo

13 years, 6 months

Updates to Blueprints Page

by Andy Doan

The Engineering Resources team has just updated information on blueprints in the wiki. The page is the same: https://wiki.linaro.org/Process/Blueprints Before going further I want to clarify: The changes *do not* add additional work to anyone. The goal was to make everyone's life a little _easier_. The changes were driven by feedback, experience, and discussions at UDS. So let me first answer the "what's in it for me" question: * consistency - in the past, information wasn't totally consistent. The new pages should be consistent in content and also consistent with what you here when you ask around about things. * clarity - Linaro uses blueprints for more than one purpose and in the past we haven't been that clear on this matter. * one less blueprint - Linaro has sort of done 3 types of bp's: 1) Engineering Blueprint 2) Tech Requirement Blueprint 3) Session Scheduling Blueprint The 3rd type isn't always needed now, and we've clarified when you would need this. This will be in my yearly review as "a 50% reduction in blueprints" :) Summary of changes: * the old Blueprints page you remember is now mostly contained in: https://wiki.linaro.org/Process/Blueprints/EngineeringBlueprint * the new main page shows you the two types of bp's and helps lead you to the proper page in the wiki that you are needing information on. * a new page for Tech Requirement Blueprints: https://wiki.linaro.org/Process/Blueprints/TRBlueprint * scheduling sessions at UDS: https://wiki.linaro.org/Process/Blueprints/SchedulingBlueprint * two new pages based on Mounir's past work: https://wiki.linaro.org/Process/Blueprints/ImplementationWorkflow https://wiki.linaro.org/Process/Blueprints/DefinitionWorkflow Feedback/Comments/Complaints are always welcome. -andy

13 years, 6 months

[PATCH] drm.h: Fix DRM compilation with bare-metal toolchain.

by Paul Sokolovsky

An ifdef in drm.h expects to be compiled with full-fledged Linux toolchain, but it's common to compile kernel with just bare-metal toolchain which doesn't define __linux__. So, also add __KERNEL__ check. Signed-off-by: Paul Sokolovsky <paul.sokolovsky(a)linaro.org> --- include/drm/drm.h | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/drm/drm.h b/include/drm/drm.h index 4be33b4..45435e3 100644 --- a/include/drm/drm.h +++ b/include/drm/drm.h @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ #ifndef _DRM_H_ #define _DRM_H_ -#if defined(__linux__) +#if defined(__KERNEL__) || defined(__linux__) #include <linux/types.h> #include <asm/ioctl.h> -- 1.7.1

13 years, 6 months

[ACTIVITY] Status report for Multimedia WG wk22.2011

by Ilias Biris

Please check the status report in th wiki https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Multimedia/WeeklyReport for more information and links. == Team Highlights == 11.05 release: libjpeg-turbo and smartt released. Smartt not a tarball yet but we may get some help to get this released via a launchpad project for this work. Need to get the individual patches from the team sent out, in order to get feedback. Sending to patches(a)linaro.org in order to get our patches counted to the Linaro metrics (this is important for libjpeg-turbo as there is no libjpeg-turbo wide community for now - we need to investigate about the upstreaming of jpeg-turbo). Patches are right now being added to git.linaro.org. Getting ready for the mini-summit, team has been asked to look through the summit topics and give feedback. Those who will not be able to attend in person, should try to get on the conference line, and check the recorded meeting to review what was discussed. Suggestions for topics not covered in the agenda for the mini summit - obviously OMX vs not-OMX vs something else - gstreamer (0.11 or 1.0) in order to address some of the challenges that we and other vendors have seen. Parsers - Android work related to OMX work and the consolidation work that the group is targeting could also be another point for the mini-summit discussion - Kurt to discuss with Zach also on the Android pain points and what Android folks would need to have fixed. - Related to the Memory Management activities - 0-copy is the area of interest in Multimedia. We will review the list of work items in the mini-summit. As for the impact of the work to other components - eg EGL API for video related images/surfaces may affect userspace gstreamer APIs (or other multimedia framework) - to what extent remains to be seen Validation tasks (Mandeep) - looking at some new techniques for analyzing code during optimization. Worked on the gst-openmax with video raw format mapping Putting together some documentation notes for the interface issues with OMX. Uploaded the multimedia test content for 5 codecs (as indicated in meeting minutes from 31.05.2011) - is the list of video codecs sufficient or do we need more? BR, ************************************* Ilias Biris, Aallonkohina 2D 19, 02320 Espoo, Finland Tel: +358 50 4839608 (mobile) Email: ilias dot biris at linaro dot org Skype: ilias_biris *************************************

13 years, 6 months

Re: [PATCH V2] ARM: S5P: Fix compilation error for exynos4_defconfig

by JinGoo Han

Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han(a)samsung.com> > ------- Original Message ------- > Sender : Tushar Behera<tushar.behera(a)linaro.org> > Date : Jun 03, 2011 16:04 (GMT+09:00) > Title : [PATCH V2] ARM: S5P: Fix compilation error for exynos4_defconfig > > Added Kconfig entry for setup-usb-phy.c on which EHCI support is > dependent on. > > Following the naming convention of other setup files, we have following > renaming. > usb-phy.c ==> setup-usb-phy.c > > Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera(a)linaro.org> > --- > arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig | 6 ++++++ > arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Makefile | 2 +- > .../mach-exynos4/{usb-phy.c => setup-usb-phy.c} | 0 > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > rename arch/arm/mach-exynos4/{usb-phy.c => setup-usb-phy.c} (100%) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig > index b92c1e5..a45a022 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig > @@ -91,6 +91,11 @@ config EXYNOS4_SETUP_FIMC > help > Common setup code for the camera interfaces. > > +config EXYNOS4_SETUP_USB_PHY > + bool > + help > + Common setup code for USB PHY controller > + > # machine support > > menu "EXYNOS4 Machines" > @@ -176,6 +181,7 @@ config MACH_NURI > select EXYNOS4_SETUP_I2C3 > select EXYNOS4_SETUP_I2C5 > select EXYNOS4_SETUP_SDHCI > + select EXYNOS4_SETUP_USB_PHY > select SAMSUNG_DEV_PWM > help > Machine support for Samsung Mobile NURI Board. > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Makefile > index a9bb94f..60fe5ec 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Makefile > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Makefile > @@ -56,4 +56,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS4_SETUP_KEYPAD) += setup-keypad.o > obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS4_SETUP_SDHCI) += setup-sdhci.o > obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS4_SETUP_SDHCI_GPIO) += setup-sdhci-gpio.o > > -obj-$(CONFIG_USB_SUPPORT) += usb-phy.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS4_SETUP_USB_PHY) += setup-usb-phy.o > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/usb-phy.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/setup-usb-phy.c > similarity index 100% > rename from arch/arm/mach-exynos4/usb-phy.c > rename to arch/arm/mach-exynos4/setup-usb-phy.c

13 years, 6 months

Re: [PATCH] ARM: S5P: Fix compilation error for exynos4_defconfig

by Tushar Behera

Hi Marek, Thanks for your review. On Friday 03 June 2011 11:23 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > Hello, > > On Friday, June 03, 2011 7:07 AM Tushar Behera wrote: > >> EHCI requires that USB support be enabled in kernel config. >> Selecting USB_SUPPORT with S5P_DEV_USB_EHCI fixes the problem. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera<tushar.behera(a)linaro.org> >> --- >> arch/arm/plat-s5p/Kconfig | 1 + >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/Kconfig b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/Kconfig >> index e98f5c5..c7e7419 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/Kconfig >> @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ config S5P_DEV_CSIS1 >> >> config S5P_DEV_USB_EHCI >> bool >> + select USB_SUPPORT > > IMHO this is not the best way to solve this issue. The main problem is > the fact that usb-phy.c file depends on CONFIG_USB_SUPPORT not it's own > Kconfig entry. Please check arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Makefile. To match the > style of other helper functions, usb-phy.c should be renamed to > setup-usb-phy.c and get it's own Kconfig entry like > CONFIG_EXYNOS4_SETUP_USB_PHY. Also the machine that uses it should select > this new entry. This is really not related to CONFIG_USB_SUPPORT at all > (one might want to have a kernel without USB support for some reason). > > Ok. I will re-submit the patch. >> help >> Compile in platform device definition for USB EHCI >> >> -- > > Best regards -- Tushar Behera

13 years, 6 months

[PATCH] ARM: S5P: Fix compilation error for exynos4_defconfig

by Tushar Behera

Hi, Typo error in writing the mailing address during git-send-email .. hence resending. -- Tushar -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [PATCH] ARM: S5P: Fix compilation error for exynos4_defconfig Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 10:37:19 +0530 From: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera(a)linaro.org> To: linux-samsung-soc(a)vger.kernel.org CC: linaro-dev(a)linaro.org, kgene.kim(a)samsung.com, nicolas.pitre(a)linaro.org, patches(a)linaro.org, jy0922.shim(a)samsung.com EHCI requires that USB support be enabled in kernel config. Selecting USB_SUPPORT with S5P_DEV_USB_EHCI fixes the problem. Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera(a)linaro.org> --- arch/arm/plat-s5p/Kconfig | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/Kconfig b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/Kconfig index e98f5c5..c7e7419 100644 --- a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/Kconfig @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ config S5P_DEV_CSIS1 config S5P_DEV_USB_EHCI bool + select USB_SUPPORT help Compile in platform device definition for USB EHCI -- 1.7.1

13 years, 6 months

Toolchain WG Weekly Status report 2011-06-03

by Mounir Bsaibes

== Weekly Status report == https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Status/2011-06-02 == Weekly Meetings minutes == https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Meetings/2011-05-30 https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Meetings/2011-06-02 == Summary == * Public plan review complete * More investigation into hot functions in SPEC 2006 * EEMBC benchmarks have arrived * Dave is profiling the memcpy() variants across the benchmarks * Planning on the sync primitives is under way. Backwards compatibility is the hard one. * Peter has started pushing the OMAP2 patches upstream, which starts to clear the backlog * Other performance work is going on: * Working on vectoriser widening multiplication * Improving auto increment/decrement for memory accesses * Talked with ARM's RVDS group re: sharing benchmarks and infrastructure Regards, Mounir

13 years, 6 months

[PowerManagement] Cpufreq tests scenarii

by Daniel Lezcano

Here is a bunch of scenarii I am planning to integrate to the pm-qa package. Any idea or comment will be appreciate. Note the test cases are designed for a specific host configured to have a minimal number of services running on it and without any pending cron jobs. This pre-requisite is needed in order to not alter the expected results. Thanks -- Daniel cpufreq: -------- (1) test the cpufreq framework is available check the following files are present in the sysfs path: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu[0-9].* -> cpufreq/scaling_available_frequencies -> cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq -> cpufreq/scaling_setspeed There are also several other files: -> cpufreq/cpuinfo_max_freq -> cpufreq/cpuinfo_cur_freq -> cpufreq/cpuinfo_min_freq -> cpufreq/cpuinfo_transition_latency -> cpufreq/stats/time_in_state -> cpufreq/stats/total_trans -> cpufreq/stats/trans_table -> ... Should we do some testing on that or do we assume it is not up to Linaro to do that as being part of the generic cpufreq framework ? (2) test the change of the frequency is effective in 'userspace' mode - set the governor to 'userspace' policy - for each frequency and cpu - write the frequency - wait at least cpuinfo_transition_latency - read the frequency - check the frequency is the expected one (3) test the change of the frequencies affect the performances of a test program (*) Write a simple program which takes a cpu list as parameter in order to set the affinity on it. This program computes the number of cycles (eg. a simple counter) it did in 1 second and display the result. In case more than one cpu is specified, a process is created for each cpu, setting the affinity on it. (**) - set the governor to userspace policy - set the frequency to the lower value - wait at least cpuinfo_transition_latency - run the test (*) program for each cpu, combinate them and concatenate the result to a file - for each frequency rerun (**) - check the result file contains noticeable increasing values (3) test the load of the cpu affects the frequency with 'ondemand' (*) write a simple program which does nothing more than consuming cpu (no syscall) for each cpu - set the governor to 'ondemand' - run (*) in background - wait at least cpuinfo_transition_latency * nr_scaling_available_frequencies - read the frequency - kill (*) - check the frequency is equal to the higher frequency available - wait at least cpuinfo_transition_latency * nr_scaling_available_frequencies - read the frequency - check the frequency is the lowest available (4) test the load of the cpu does not affect the frequency with 'userspace' for each cpu - set the governor to 'userspace' - set the frequency between min and max frequencies - wait at least cpuinfo_transition_latency * nr_scaling_available_frequencies - run (*) in background - wait at least cpuinfo_transition_latency * nr_scaling_available_frequencies - read the frequency - kill (*) - check the frequency is equal to the one we set (5) test the load of the cpu does not affect the frequency with 'powersave' for each cpu - set the governor to 'powersave' - wait at least cpuinfo_transition_latency * nr_scaling_available_frequencies - check the frequency is the lowest available - run (*) in background - wait at least cpuinfo_transition_latency * nr_scaling_available_frequencies - - read the frequency - kill (*) - check the frequency is the lowest available (6) test the load of the cpu affects the frequency with 'conservative' for each cpu - set the governor to 'conservative' for each freq step - set the up_threshold to the freq step - wait at least cpuinfo_transition_latency * nr_scaling_available_frequencies - run (*) in background - wait at least cpuinfo_transition_latency * nr_scaling_available_frequencies - read the frequency - check the frequency is equal to higher we have with the freq_step - kill (*)

13 years, 6 months

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

linaro-dev June 2011