On 21 June 2013 11:02, Olivier Martin olivier.martin@arm.com wrote:

I committed this change after fixing the coding style (revision 14437).

Yes, your revised version is more appropriate. Thanks.

...

-----Original Message----- From: Ryan Harkin [mailto:ryan.harkin@linaro.org] Sent: 21 June 2013 09:05 To: ryan.harkin@linaro.org; edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; patches@linaro.org; boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org; Olivier Martin Subject: [PATCH 5/9] ArmPlatformPkg/Bds: Make ".EFI" files recognizable as EFI applications.

From: Leif Lindholm leif.lindholm@linaro.org

Currently, only ".efi" files are recognized as valid ARM UEFI applications by BDS. This patch also makes ".EFI" files recognised.

Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm leif.lindholm@linaro.org

ArmPlatformPkg/Bds/BdsHelper.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/ArmPlatformPkg/Bds/BdsHelper.c b/ArmPlatformPkg/Bds/BdsHelper.c index fa3026c..d1889f4 100644 --- a/ArmPlatformPkg/Bds/BdsHelper.c +++ b/ArmPlatformPkg/Bds/BdsHelper.c @@ -205,6 +205,9 @@ HasFilePathEfiExtension ( IN CHAR16* FilePath ) {

• if (StrCmp (FilePath + (StrSize(FilePath)/sizeof(CHAR16)) - 5,

L".EFI") == 0)

• return 1;
• return (StrCmp (FilePath + (StrSize(FilePath)/sizeof(CHAR16)) - 5,

L".efi") == 0); }

-- 1.7.9.5

---

boot-architecture mailing list boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture