On 18/05/2018 18:08, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 06:04:11PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
My bikeshed now has a sign that reads:
+As stated above, EBBR systems must not provide both ACPI +and Devicetree tables at the same time. +Systems that support both interfaces must provide a configuration +mechanism to select either ACPI or Devicetree, +and must ensure only the selected interface is provided +to the OS loader.
I think that's a very pleasing shade, thanks! :)
(Sorry, I spent far too long working on interoperability of some particularly poorly specified networking standards so now have difficulty reading any spec without assuming the worst.)
Thanks! I'll take that as you're Acked-by then. :-)
g.
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 06:09:41PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
On 18/05/2018 18:08, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 06:04:11PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
My bikeshed now has a sign that reads:
+As stated above, EBBR systems must not provide both ACPI +and Devicetree tables at the same time. +Systems that support both interfaces must provide a configuration +mechanism to select either ACPI or Devicetree, +and must ensure only the selected interface is provided +to the OS loader.
I think that's a very pleasing shade, thanks! :)
(Sorry, I spent far too long working on interoperability of some particularly poorly specified networking standards so now have difficulty reading any spec without assuming the worst.)
Thanks! I'll take that as you're Acked-by then. :-)
+1 ;-)
Acked-by: Daniel Thompson daniel.thompson@linaro.org
Daniel.
boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org
-
Daniel Thompson -
Grant Likely