Remove the link to the draft index.rst file and replace it with a link to the releases page. The link to the index.rst doesn't make sense anymore now that the text is broken out into one file per chapter.
Resolves: #24
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely grant.likely@arm.com --- README.rst | 11 ++--------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/README.rst b/README.rst index f20ddbf..db2aa4a 100644 --- a/README.rst +++ b/README.rst @@ -13,16 +13,9 @@ expected in September 2018. You can find the current draft text in this repository, but be aware that everything in the draft text is subject to change before an official v1.0 release is published.
-This repository can be used to build a .pdf of the document, and soon there -will be a CI loop generating a .pdf for each commit. In the mean time you -can look at the source text directly here: +Released EBBR PDFs can be found here:
-`EBBR Draft Text`_ - -GitHub does a good job of rendering the reStructuredText markup into -something readable. - -.. _`EBBR Draft Text`: source/index.rst +https://github.com/ARM-software/ebbr/releases
Build Instructions ==================
How to participate in this project wasn't very clear. Put information on how to contribute in a prominent place in the README.
Suggested-by: David Rusling david.rusling@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Grant Likely grant.likely@arm.com --- README.rst | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/README.rst b/README.rst index db2aa4a..e8f241d 100644 --- a/README.rst +++ b/README.rst @@ -17,6 +17,14 @@ Released EBBR PDFs can be found here:
https://github.com/ARM-software/ebbr/releases
+Contributing +============ + +Anyone may contribute to EBBR. Discussion is on the +boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org mailing list, +and there is a weekly conference call. +See CONTRIBUTING.rst_ for details. + Build Instructions ==================
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 12:17:14PM -0500, Grant Likely wrote:
How to participate in this project wasn't very clear. Put information on how to contribute in a prominent place in the README.
Suggested-by: David Rusling david.rusling@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Grant Likely grant.likely@arm.com
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson daniel.thompson@linaro.org
(but contingent on the other change to put the weekly call into CONTRIBUTING.rst also landing)
README.rst | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/README.rst b/README.rst index db2aa4a..e8f241d 100644 --- a/README.rst +++ b/README.rst @@ -17,6 +17,14 @@ Released EBBR PDFs can be found here: https://github.com/ARM-software/ebbr/releases +Contributing +============
+Anyone may contribute to EBBR. Discussion is on the +boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org mailing list, +and there is a weekly conference call. +See CONTRIBUTING.rst_ for details.
Build Instructions
2.13.0
Arm.ebbr-discuss mailing list Arm.ebbr-discuss@arm.com
All, I decided to play with u-boot*, so I bought another Raspberry Pi (3b+ this time, my house backup and useful things is a 3b). After a bit of fiddling, both are now running 64 bit releases of Buster. I can supply the bits if anyone needs anything.
So, u-boot. I can build the normal configuration (rpi_3_defconfig) on both Arm and x86. Trying to build rpi_3_32b_defconfig gives me the same error on both x86 and Arm. Basically, it's trying to pass -marmv5 to the compiler and the compiler is having none of it. I can hack the Arm Makefile to remove the armv5, but that generates different errors, so no easy fix. I've also trying the 'stabbing in the dark' approach of configuring it 64 bit only etc, but no joy.
Two questions:
[1] Is rpi_3_defconfig the right config to support booting a RPi 3b? If it is, I'll swap my home and development boards
[2] Anyone managing to build u-boot for the RPi 3b+?
David
* 'cos it's relaxing and fun
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:00 PM, David Rusling david.rusling@linaro.org wrote:
All, I decided to play with u-boot*, so I bought another Raspberry Pi (3b+ this time, my house backup and useful things is a 3b). After a bit of fiddling, both are now running 64 bit releases of Buster. I can supply the bits if anyone needs anything.
So, u-boot. I can build the normal configuration (rpi_3_defconfig) on both Arm and x86. Trying to build rpi_3_32b_defconfig gives me the same error on both x86 and Arm. Basically, it's trying to pass -marmv5 to the compiler and the compiler is having none of it. I can hack the Arm Makefile to remove the armv5, but that generates different errors, so no easy fix. I've also trying the 'stabbing in the dark' approach of configuring it 64 bit only etc, but no joy.
Two questions:
[1] Is rpi_3_defconfig the right config to support booting a RPi 3b? If it is, I'll swap my home and development boards
rpi_3_defconfig is the 64 bit aarch64 config and it's for all models of the 3B, so the original, the 3B+ and the CM3, the rpi_3_32b_defconfig is for 32bit ARMv7 booting so running a 32bit OS on all variants of the 3.
[2] Anyone managing to build u-boot for the RPi 3b+?
Yes, the one you built above will detect both models, the rpi_3_32b_defconfig config is also for both models but is for 32 bit OS (32b)
Peter, thanks, that was one explanation that I hadn't thought of (32b = 32 bits). Really helpful, onwards and upwards... David
On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 at 13:42 Peter Robinson pbrobinson@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:00 PM, David Rusling david.rusling@linaro.org wrote:
All, I decided to play with u-boot*, so I bought another Raspberry Pi (3b+
this
time, my house backup and useful things is a 3b). After a bit of
fiddling,
both are now running 64 bit releases of Buster. I can supply the bits if anyone needs anything.
So, u-boot. I can build the normal configuration (rpi_3_defconfig) on both Arm and x86. Trying to build rpi_3_32b_defconfig gives me the same error on both x86 and Arm. Basically, it's trying to pass -marmv5 to the compiler and the compiler is having none of it. I can hack the Arm Makefile to remove the armv5, but that generates different errors, so no easy fix. I've also trying the 'stabbing in the dark' approach of configuring it 64 bit only etc, but no joy.
Two questions:
[1] Is rpi_3_defconfig the right config to support booting a RPi 3b?
If it
is, I'll swap my home and development boards
rpi_3_defconfig is the 64 bit aarch64 config and it's for all models of the 3B, so the original, the 3B+ and the CM3, the rpi_3_32b_defconfig is for 32bit ARMv7 booting so running a 32bit OS on all variants of the 3.
[2] Anyone managing to build u-boot for the RPi 3b+?
Yes, the one you built above will detect both models, the rpi_3_32b_defconfig config is also for both models but is for 32 bit OS (32b)
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:46 PM, David Rusling david.rusling@linaro.org wrote:
Peter, thanks, that was one explanation that I hadn't thought of (32b = 32 bits). Really helpful, onwards and upwards...
FYI they work fine 32 and 64 bits on both the 3B and 3B+ for me, only currently tested 64 bit with uefi but they work fine for me, plus a bunch of other 96boards.
Peter
David
On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 at 13:42 Peter Robinson pbrobinson@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:00 PM, David Rusling david.rusling@linaro.org wrote:
All, I decided to play with u-boot*, so I bought another Raspberry Pi (3b+ this time, my house backup and useful things is a 3b). After a bit of fiddling, both are now running 64 bit releases of Buster. I can supply the bits if anyone needs anything.
So, u-boot. I can build the normal configuration (rpi_3_defconfig) on both Arm and x86. Trying to build rpi_3_32b_defconfig gives me the same error on both x86 and Arm. Basically, it's trying to pass -marmv5 to the compiler and the compiler is having none of it. I can hack the Arm Makefile to remove the armv5, but that generates different errors, so no easy fix. I've also trying the 'stabbing in the dark' approach of configuring it 64 bit only etc, but no joy.
Two questions:
[1] Is rpi_3_defconfig the right config to support booting a RPi 3b? If it is, I'll swap my home and development boards
rpi_3_defconfig is the 64 bit aarch64 config and it's for all models of the 3B, so the original, the 3B+ and the CM3, the rpi_3_32b_defconfig is for 32bit ARMv7 booting so running a 32bit OS on all variants of the 3.
[2] Anyone managing to build u-boot for the RPi 3b+?
Yes, the one you built above will detect both models, the rpi_3_32b_defconfig config is also for both models but is for 32 bit OS (32b)
-- David A Rusling CTO, Linaro https://linaro.org
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 12:17:13PM -0500, Grant Likely wrote:
Remove the link to the draft index.rst file and replace it with a link to the releases page. The link to the index.rst doesn't make sense anymore now that the text is broken out into one file per chapter.
Resolves: #24
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely grant.likely@arm.com
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson daniel.thompson@linaro.org
README.rst | 11 ++--------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/README.rst b/README.rst index f20ddbf..db2aa4a 100644 --- a/README.rst +++ b/README.rst @@ -13,16 +13,9 @@ expected in September 2018. You can find the current draft text in this repository, but be aware that everything in the draft text is subject to change before an official v1.0 release is published. -This repository can be used to build a .pdf of the document, and soon there -will be a CI loop generating a .pdf for each commit. In the mean time you -can look at the source text directly here: +Released EBBR PDFs can be found here: -`EBBR Draft Text`_
-GitHub does a good job of rendering the reStructuredText markup into -something readable.
-.. _`EBBR Draft Text`: source/index.rst +https://github.com/ARM-software/ebbr/releases Build Instructions ================== -- 2.13.0
Arm.ebbr-discuss mailing list Arm.ebbr-discuss@arm.com
boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org
-
Daniel Thompson -
David Rusling -
Grant Likely -
Peter Robinson