Terse information, more engineering notes than documentation, and links to sources can be found at: https://wiki.linaro.org/LEG/Engineering/Kernel/UEFI/RuntimeServices
Contains a few known bugs, and will need some fundamental discussions/reengineering, but lets us start experimenting.
/ Leif
On 20:36 Fri 26 Apr , Leif Lindholm wrote:
Terse information, more engineering notes than documentation, and links to sources can be found at: https://wiki.linaro.org/LEG/Engineering/Kernel/UEFI/RuntimeServices
Contains a few known bugs, and will need some fundamental discussions/reengineering, but lets us start experimenting.
impossible to test on omap4 as it's impossible to run the UEFI on qemu or real hw
Best Regards, J.
/ Leif
boot-architecture mailing list boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture
On 26 Apr 2013 22:14, "Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD" < plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> wrote:
Contains a few known bugs, and will need some fundamental discussions/reengineering, but lets us start experimenting.
impossible to test on omap4 as it's impossible to run the UEFI on qemu or real hw
Are you saying that the pandaboard UEFI build is broken?
/ Leif
Best Regards, J.
On Apr 27, 2013, at 6:35 AM, Leif Lindholm leif.lindholm@linaro.org wrote:
On 26 Apr 2013 22:14, "Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD" plagnioj@jcrosoft.com wrote:
Contains a few known bugs, and will need some fundamental discussions/reengineering, but lets us start experimenting.
impossible to test on omap4 as it's impossible to run the UEFI on qemu or real hw
Are you saying that the pandaboard UEFI build is broken?
No typo omap3 is broken real and qemu
Vexpress qemu too
/ Leif
boot-architecture mailing list boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture
boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org