Hi,
I just updated the technical report https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CLkhLRaz_zcCq44DLGmPZQFPbYHOC6nzPowaL0XmRk0/edit?usp=sharing with a section on "Trusting DT" that is the result of my analysis of the discussion we had (not what I presented).
Please comment, correct, update...
Cordially,
FF
On 24.07.20 17:14, François Ozog wrote:
Hi,
I just updated the technical report https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CLkhLRaz_zcCq44DLGmPZQFPbYHOC6nzPowaL0XmRk0/edit?usp=sharing with a section on "Trusting DT" that is the result of my analysis of the discussion we had (not what I presented).
Please comment, correct, update...
Cordially,
FF
We should make sure that the report does not become unnecessarily architecture or OS specific.
Based on the EBBR we can boot on x86, ARM, RISC-V into operating system like OpenBSD, FreeBSD, Linux, Windows.
The first stage firmware can be OpenBSI, U-Boot SPL, or TF-A.
The term BL33 is specific to TF-A. In most instances the firmware providing the UEFI API or otherwise loading the operating system is meant.
I have appended a commented/edited version. Activate View->Track Changes in LibreOffice to see where I modified the text.
Best regards
Heinrich
Sorry for the late reply. 3 weeks vacation + get up to speed on all topics...
On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 19:46, Heinrich Schuchardt xypron.glpk@gmx.de wrote:
On 24.07.20 17:14, François Ozog wrote:
Hi,
I just updated the technical report <
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CLkhLRaz_zcCq44DLGmPZQFPbYHOC6nzPowaL0Xm...
with a section on "Trusting DT" that is the result of my analysis of the discussion we had (not what I presented).
Please comment, correct, update...
Cordially,
FF
We should make sure that the report does not become unnecessarily architecture or OS specific.
Absolutely agree.
Based on the EBBR we can boot on x86, ARM, RISC-V into operating system
like OpenBSD, FreeBSD, Linux, Windows.
The first stage firmware can be OpenBSI, U-Boot SPL, or TF-A.
The term BL33 is specific to TF-A. In most instances the firmware providing the UEFI API or otherwise loading the operating system is meant.
Yes. That is why the terminology section is important. Some words need
precise definition in the context of the TR.
I have appended a commented/edited version. Activate View->Track Changes
in LibreOffice to see where I modified the text.
I have MS Word.I think I see your changes but not fully sure. I am merging
your changes, let me know if that worked (should be implemented by tomorrow).
Best regards
Heinrich
On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 15:46, François Ozog francois.ozog@linaro.org wrote:
Sorry for the late reply. 3 weeks vacation + get up to speed on all topics...
On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 19:46, Heinrich Schuchardt xypron.glpk@gmx.de wrote:
On 24.07.20 17:14, François Ozog wrote:
Hi,
I just updated the technical report <
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CLkhLRaz_zcCq44DLGmPZQFPbYHOC6nzPowaL0Xm...
with a section on "Trusting DT" that is the result of my analysis of the discussion we had (not what I presented).
Please comment, correct, update...
Cordially,
FF
We should make sure that the report does not become unnecessarily architecture or OS specific.
Absolutely agree.
In the intent to be fully agnostic (architecture, platform,firmware framework,OS...), the Terminology section have defined: Booted Payload - the thing that is booted Firmware Framework - (TF-A and U-Boot are such frameworks Handover Function - The component that stages Booted Payload in memory and transfer control to it (and may implement UEFI interface) Platform Initialization Function (new)
I have updated text to deliver on genericity.
Based on the EBBR we can boot on x86, ARM, RISC-V into operating system
like OpenBSD, FreeBSD, Linux, Windows.
The first stage firmware can be OpenBSI, U-Boot SPL, or TF-A.
The term BL33 is specific to TF-A. In most instances the firmware providing the UEFI API or otherwise loading the operating system is meant.
Yes. That is why the terminology section is important. Some words need
precise definition in the context of the TR.
I have appended a commented/edited version. Activate View->Track Changes
in LibreOffice to see where I modified the text.
I have MS Word.I think I see your changes but not fully sure. I am
merging your changes, let me know if that worked (should be implemented by tomorrow).
Best regards
Heinrich
-- François-Frédéric Ozog | *Director Linaro Edge & Fog Computing Group* T: +33.67221.6485 francois.ozog@linaro.org | Skype: ffozog
boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org
-
François Ozog -
Heinrich Schuchardt