On 2 May 2012 05:15, Michael Hope michael.hope@linaro.org wrote:
On 27 April 2012 11:59, Michael Hope michael.hope@linaro.org wrote:
On 23 April 2012 14:23, Jon Masters jcm@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/22/2012 06:06 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
On 21 April 2012 09:10, Jon Masters jcm@redhat.com wrote:
Hey everyone,
Following up here. Where do we stand? We need to have upstream patches before we can pull them into the distro - is that piece done?
Hi Jon. I've been away, sorry. I've just sent the GCC patch and Carlos is on the hook for the GLIBC side.
I saw the email. Could folks do me a favor and let me know the moment this lands in upstream and I'll arrange for us to pull it immediately.
(I'm on all the libc lists, but then I'm on almost every list, everywhere, so it takes a bit of time to get to it)
Hi Jon. There's a fault with the GCC patch so it's still in progress. Carlos sent the GLIBC patch out for review today.
Hi Jon. The GCC patch is now upstream as r186859 and r187012.
I noticed that it now sets the dynamic loader to /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3 even when configured for soft-float ABI and linking against a soft-float rootfs. The resulting binaries then fail to run. Passing -mfloat-abi=softfp to the link command fixes it. Is this change in behaviour intentional?