Good Afternoon,
My name is Alan Briggs, I am responsible for all English speaking
markets at teliad, an international service provider in the field of
Search Engine Optimization (SEO).
I was just doing some research online for a current project I'm working
on and found your site lists.linaro.org. This seems like a good fit, as
it shows some great SEO factors. I figured I'd go ahead and use the
contact details provided on the webpage and drop you a quick line.
At this point, we'd be very interested in exploring the marketing
possibilities of your site - especially when it comes to integrating
text links (pure html backlinks).
Should this be of interest, I would certainly be happy to explain
further. Don't hesitate to give me a call or shoot me an email anytime!
Thanks & have a great day!
Best regards,
Alan Briggs
------------------------------------------------------------------------
teliad Internetmarketing GmbH |
Kreuznacher Str. 62 |
70372 Stuttgart | Tel. +49 (0)711 231 971 26
Germany | http://www.teliad.com
HRB 720138 Stuttgart Court of First Instance
CEO: Andreas Armbruster
------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential
and/or protected by law. If you are not the intended addressee(s) or
have received this message in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete it from your system. Any unauthorized use,
distribution, copying or modification of this message and its
attachments is strictly prohibited.
To ensure delivery of these Emails to your inbox, please add sales(a)gk-ing.com to your email address book.
Dear :
How are you?Xmas season recommend you our new arrival DVR android gps tablet.
1)7 inch 800*480 Solution.
2)300M Dailyroads voyager DVR camera on the back,300K Pixels CMOS on fron
3)Android 4.0 Operation system
4)512MB Ram,8GB flash
5)WIFI 802.11 a/b/g/n
6)Map:Google map ,Igo,navitel etc.
Sample and small order available for you test before mass order.We also have many other models for your choice.For details pls visit http://www.gk-ing.com/products.html
Waiting for your any feedback ,thank you!
Best Regards
Cngking
G&K.Ing "We make miracle" ?
Add:Rm 703.KingLihua Commercial Building,YiYuan Road,Bao"an ,ShenZhen,China
Tel: 86(0)755 22208877 Fax:86(0)755 22141877 Website:www.gk-ing.com
If you don't want to receive these Emails, please click unsubscribe.
The first is the 4GB SSD and the second is the 8GB SSD inside my EEE 901
netbook. These old SSDs seem to be from the dumper side of SSD market
and behave more like dump flash with little controller interference.
My guess for the 4GB SSD: erase size 1 Megabyte, page size 2048 Byte
My guess for the 8GB SSD: erase size 2 Megabyte, page size 2048 Byte
Both perform well with up to 9 au, though 8 give a little more speed.
Now I would only need to know how to translate this into fitting
stride/stripe values...
root@Microknoppix:/tmp/flashbench-HEAD-2e30b19# ./flashbench -a /dev/sda
--blocksize=1024
align 1073741824 pre 641µs on 792µs post 567µs
diff 187µs
align 536870912 pre 683µs on 851µs post 577µs diff 221µs
align 268435456 pre 657µs on 847µs post 564µs diff 236µs
align 134217728 pre 626µs on 794µs post 525µs diff 218µs
align 67108864 pre 666µs on 836µs post 582µs diff 212µs
align 33554432 pre 573µs on 732µs post 571µs diff 160µs
align 16777216 pre 577µs on 738µs post 572µs diff 163µs
align 8388608 pre 565µs on 740µs post 563µs diff 176µs
align 4194304 pre 580µs on 735µs post 562µs diff 164µs
align 2097152 pre 552µs on 706µs post 522µs diff 169µs
align 1048576 pre 565µs on 734µs post 547µs diff 178µs
align 524288 pre 548µs on 640µs post 542µs diff 94.7µs
align 262144 pre 546µs on 639µs post 540µs diff 96.1µs
align 131072 pre 547µs on 640µs post 541µs diff 96.1µs
align 65536 pre 536µs on 629µs post 528µs diff 96.7µs
align 32768 pre 535µs on 626µs post 526µs diff 95.6µs
align 16384 pre 534µs on 627µs post 527µs diff 97.2µs
align 8192 pre 558µs on 654µs post 554µs diff 98µs
align 4096 pre 536µs on 633µs post 528µs diff 101µs
align 2048 pre 549µs on 546µs post 550µs diff -3781ns
root@Microknoppix:/tmp/flashbench-HEAD-2e30b19# ./flashbench -a /dev/sdb
--blocksize=1024
align 2147483648 pre 740µs on 890µs post 628µs
diff 207µs
align 1073741824 pre 732µs on 898µs post 603µs
diff 231µs
align 536870912 pre 740µs on 913µs post 590µs diff 248µs
align 268435456 pre 716µs on 890µs post 596µs diff 234µs
align 134217728 pre 694µs on 858µs post 586µs diff 218µs
align 67108864 pre 598µs on 771µs post 575µs diff 184µs
align 33554432 pre 619µs on 788µs post 590µs diff 184µs
align 16777216 pre 624µs on 791µs post 591µs diff 184µs
align 8388608 pre 613µs on 776µs post 578µs diff 180µs
align 4194304 pre 619µs on 781µs post 584µs diff 179µs
align 2097152 pre 617µs on 782µs post 574µs diff 187µs
align 1048576 pre 631µs on 756µs post 632µs diff 125µs
align 524288 pre 634µs on 747µs post 634µs diff 113µs
align 262144 pre 619µs on 717µs post 599µs diff 108µs
align 131072 pre 603µs on 722µs post 601µs diff 120µs
align 65536 pre 627µs on 748µs post 629µs diff 120µs
align 32768 pre 619µs on 743µs post 628µs diff 119µs
align 16384 pre 619µs on 736µs post 621µs diff 116µs
align 8192 pre 622µs on 733µs post 617µs diff 114µs
align 4096 pre 598µs on 721µs post 587µs diff 128µs
align 2048 pre 596µs on 596µs post 598µs diff -1092ns
--
Christian Brandt
life is short and in most cases it ends with death
but my tombstone will carry the hiscore
To ensure delivery of these Emails to your inbox, please add sales(a)gk-ing.com to your email address book.
Christmas Great deal
G&K.Ing enterprise Co.,Ltd
Great deal 7inch MID tablet Usd$56.50/pc
7"800*480 Multi-capacitance screen
Allwinner A10 1.2G CPU
512MB ddr3/4GB flash
Mid tablet
G&K-M701
Built-in 3G/Analog TV/GPS/Bluetooth/Dual SIM card/MTK6575 A9, 1GHz/8GB flash
$112.00/pcs
G&K-702
Android 4.0
A13 1.2GB
4GB flash with camera
$47.50/pcs
G&K-901
Android 4.0
A13 1.2GB
8GB flash with camera
$69.00/pcs
High-end car Gps
G&K-522
5"800*480 Bluetooth/FM/AVIN
Car recorder
128MB/128MB
$58.90/pcs
G&K-536
5"800*480 Bluetooth/FM/AVIN
128MB/128MB
High-end standard
$47.50/pcs
G&K-706
7"800*480 Bluetooth/FM/AVIN
128MB/128MB
High-end standard
$53.00/pcs
Wifi USB
16GB-64GB 802.11 b/g/n
R:10-20MB/S W:8-15MB/S USB Port*1
DC port*1
Usb flash drive
Classical USB Flash
Novel usb flash
Food USB Flash
Credit Card USB flash
Leather USB Flash
Crystal USB flash
Cartoon usb flash
Statement
Dear
Thank for your time .With the development of consumer Electronic, a phenomenon that nots allow to ignore, all the businessmen are in struggle price,low price means low materials cost.
We only can promise our product ,We offered High-end device.our screen,battery,
accessories...all produce with our conscience.hope give help for your business.
Best Regards/G&K.Ing
G&K.Ing Enterprise Co.,Ltd(Shenzhen.China)
Tel: 860755-22208877 E-mail: sales(a)gk-ing.com
http://gk-ing.en.alibaba.com/www.gk-ing.com
If you don't want to receive these Emails, please click unsubscribe.
Hi again,
I've tested another SDHC card. But this time it was a class-4 mini-SDHC with 8GB.
The card is a very cheap one from the German drugstore DM. (No, usually I do not buy my electronics in drugstores ;-) - just a backup card.)
Ok, here are the results. I'm not sure, if my interpretation of them is right.
I've read, that the choice of the underlaying filesystem depends on the amount of open erase blocks.
Is there any rule of best practice for choosing the right filesystem for a particular sd card?
Some feedback would be nice!
Bye, Holger
$ fdisk -l /dev/sdc
Disk /dev/sdc: 7948 MB, 7948206080 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 966 cylinders, total 15523840 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000
$ ./flashbench -a /dev/sdc --blocksize=1024
align 2147483648 pre 825µs on 1.19ms post 851µs diff 347µs
align 1073741824 pre 841µs on 1.18ms post 830µs diff 341µs
align 536870912 pre 821µs on 1.14ms post 779µs diff 341µs
align 268435456 pre 842µs on 1.18ms post 818µs diff 346µs
align 134217728 pre 832µs on 1.16ms post 799µs diff 346µs
align 67108864 pre 860µs on 1.16ms post 822µs diff 321µs
align 33554432 pre 832µs on 1.15ms post 802µs diff 331µs
align 16777216 pre 783µs on 1.16ms post 824µs diff 359µs
align 8388608 pre 807µs on 1.1ms post 781µs diff 303µs
align 4194304 pre 817µs on 1.14ms post 786µs diff 340µs
align 2097152 pre 847µs on 924µs post 791µs diff 105µs
align 1048576 pre 791µs on 935µs post 807µs diff 136µs
align 524288 pre 826µs on 906µs post 823µs diff 81.9µs
align 262144 pre 810µs on 926µs post 826µs diff 108µs
align 131072 pre 832µs on 913µs post 801µs diff 96.5µs
align 65536 pre 819µs on 922µs post 830µs diff 97.2µs
align 32768 pre 831µs on 941µs post 807µs diff 122µs
align 16384 pre 772µs on 918µs post 820µs diff 122µs
align 8192 pre 798µs on 845µs post 837µs diff 27µs
align 4096 pre 794µs on 823µs post 806µs diff 22.2µs
align 2048 pre 836µs on 850µs post 801µs diff 31.7µs
## Looks like 4MB erase blocksize and 16KB page size??
$ ./flashbench /dev/sdc --open-au --erasesize=$[4*1024*1024] --blocksize=$[4*1024] --random --open-au-nr=1
4MiB 5.41M/s
2MiB 8.97M/s
1MiB 5.98M/s
512KiB 17.1M/s
256KiB 10.9M/s
128KiB 4.25M/s
64KiB 2.13M/s
32KiB 1.06M/s
16KiB 545K/s
8KiB 2.07M/s
4KiB 1.76M/s
$ ./flashbench /dev/sdc --open-au --erasesize=$[4*1024*1024] --blocksize=$[4*1024] --random --open-au-nr=2
4MiB 8.21M/s
2MiB 5.75M/s
1MiB 18.5M/s
512KiB 16.8M/s
256KiB 10.7M/s
128KiB 4.26M/s
64KiB 2.11M/s
32KiB 1.06M/s
16KiB 545K/s
8KiB 2.05M/s
4KiB 1.69M/s
$ ./flashbench /dev/sdc --open-au --erasesize=$[4*1024*1024] --blocksize=$[4*1024] --random --open-au-nr=3
4MiB 9.18M/s
2MiB 19.1M/s
1MiB 18.7M/s
512KiB 16.5M/s
256KiB 10.8M/s
128KiB 4.23M/s
64KiB 2.11M/s
32KiB 1.06M/s
16KiB 544K/s
8KiB 1.99M/s
4KiB 1.67M/s
$./flashbench /dev/sdc --open-au --erasesize=$[4*1024*1024] --blocksize=$[4*1024] --random --open-au-nr=4
4MiB 10.6M/s
2MiB 19.3M/s
1MiB 18.6M/s
512KiB 16.6M/s
256KiB 10.9M/s
128KiB 4.24M/s
64KiB 2.11M/s
32KiB 1.06M/s
16KiB 544K/s
8KiB 1.86M/s
4KiB 1.53M/s
$ ./flashbench /dev/sdc --open-au --erasesize=$[4*1024*1024] --blocksize=$[4*1024] --random --open-au-nr=5
4MiB 6.1M/s
2MiB 6.68M/s
1MiB 4.39M/s
512KiB 2.96M/s
256KiB 1.95M/s
128KiB 1.02M/s
64KiB 570K/s
32KiB 334K/s
16KiB 167K/s
8KiB 1M/s
4KiB 1.14M/s
$ ./flashbench /dev/sdc --open-au --erasesize=$[4*1024*1024] --blocksize=$[4*1024] --random --open-au-nr=6
4MiB 7.5M/s
2MiB 4.69M/s
1MiB 3.38M/s
512KiB 2.02M/s
256KiB 1.22M/s
128KiB 688K/s
64KiB 406K/s
^C
## Looks like 4.
$./flashbench /dev/sdc -f --erasesize=$[4*1024*1024]
4MiB 4.11M/s 17.4M/s 16.9M/s 5.62M/s 5.18M/s 5.2M/s
2MiB 5.02M/s 17.6M/s 17.2M/s 5.32M/s 5.03M/s 5.21M/s
1MiB 5.28M/s 17.2M/s 17.2M/s 5.53M/s 5.21M/s 5M/s
512KiB 5.04M/s 17.4M/s 5.07M/s 5.21M/s 5.27M/s 5.01M/s
256KiB 5.19M/s 17.1M/s 5.02M/s 5.21M/s 5.02M/s 5.21M/s
128KiB 2.35M/s 16.6M/s 4.96M/s 5.22M/s 4.99M/s 5.18M/s
64KiB 4.98M/s 16.6M/s 5.21M/s 4.91M/s 4.97M/s 5.21M/s
32KiB 2.31M/s 14.8M/s 5.11M/s 4.92M/s 5.12M/s 5.2M/s
16KiB 4.81M/s 12.4M/s 5.07M/s 5M/s 5M/s 4.82M/s
## Looks like the second and the third block were faster than the others.
Hi,
I'm new to the topic of flash benchmarking. I came across reading several articles about this topic, like these in the German Linux Magazin, issue 07/12 and Arnd's linked article on lwn.
I'm currently playing around with a Raspberry Pi that needs a SD card to boot from. (first partition FAT32 for the kernel, second something like ext3/ext4 for the rootfs). I would like to
get the 'best' perfomance out of it, so I also had a look at the flashbench tool. I made some tests with my 32GB Transcend SDHC card and found out, that the card has a 8MB erase block size
and 8KB pages and can handle up to 5 open-au's. (results are listed below)
So what next?
The next step for me is to find out, how to align the partitions correctly. I already talked to Andrew (thx! I was wrong with the erase block size.) who send me the following link that points
to a script that creates two partitions and aligns them correctly.
Is there anything else I can do? ...or am I wrong?
Bye, Holger
--
$ fdisk -l /dev/sdc
Disk /dev/sdc: 32.5 GB, 32462864384 bytes
64 Köpfe, 32 Sektoren/Spur, 30959 Zylinder, zusammen 63404032 Sektoren
Einheiten = Sektoren von 1 × 512 = 512 Bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x000c0bcb
$ ./flashbench -a /dev/sdc --blocksize=1024
align 8589934592 pre 1.04ms on 1.59ms post 1.32ms diff 402µs
align 4294967296 pre 1.04ms on 1.67ms post 1.33ms diff 485µs
align 2147483648 pre 1.03ms on 1.64ms post 1.31ms diff 468µs
align 1073741824 pre 1.02ms on 1.48ms post 1.33ms diff 309µs
align 536870912 pre 1.02ms on 1.5ms post 1.35ms diff 320µs
align 268435456 pre 1.02ms on 1.49ms post 1.28ms diff 338µs
align 134217728 pre 1.02ms on 1.49ms post 1.34ms diff 314µs
align 67108864 pre 1.04ms on 1.48ms post 1.27ms diff 332µs
align 33554432 pre 1.01ms on 1.5ms post 1.32ms diff 330µs
align 16777216 pre 1.04ms on 1.5ms post 1.28ms diff 347µs
align 8388608 pre 995µs on 1.51ms post 1.31ms diff 354µs
align 4194304 pre 1.02ms on 1.35ms post 1.3ms diff 189µs
align 2097152 pre 1.05ms on 1.39ms post 1.31ms diff 209µs
align 1048576 pre 1.04ms on 1.37ms post 1.29ms diff 203µs
align 524288 pre 1.02ms on 1.36ms post 1.32ms diff 192µs
align 262144 pre 1.01ms on 1.33ms post 1.31ms diff 176µs
align 131072 pre 1.03ms on 1.35ms post 1.31ms diff 182µs
align 65536 pre 1.01ms on 1.33ms post 1.26ms diff 195µs
align 32768 pre 1.04ms on 1.37ms post 1.29ms diff 203µs
align 16384 pre 1.04ms on 1.36ms post 1.28ms diff 204µs
align 8192 pre 1.02ms on 1.3ms post 1.27ms diff 154µs
align 4096 pre 1.17ms on 1.16ms post 1.11ms diff 22.6µs
align 2048 pre 1.25ms on 1.24ms post 1.2ms diff 20.2µs
## For me it looks like 8MB erase block size and a 8KB page size. With that in mind, I made the following tests:
$ ./flashbench /dev/sdc --open-au --erasesize=$[8*1024*1024] --blocksize=$[8*1024] --open-au-nr=3 --random
8MiB 17M/s
4MiB 17.2M/s
2MiB 16.5M/s
1MiB 15.9M/s
512KiB 15M/s
256KiB 13.1M/s
128KiB 10.7M/s
64KiB 10.9M/s
32KiB 7.84M/s
16KiB 4.87M/s
8KiB 1.79M/s
$ ./flashbench /dev/sdc --open-au --erasesize=$[8*1024*1024] --blocksize=$[8*1024] --open-au-nr=4 --random
8MiB 17.4M/s
4MiB 17.1M/s
2MiB 16.8M/s
1MiB 16M/s
512KiB 15M/s
256KiB 13.4M/s
128KiB 10.8M/s
64KiB 10.9M/s
32KiB 7.89M/s
16KiB 4.87M/s
8KiB 1.79M/s
$ ./flashbench /dev/sdc --open-au --erasesize=$[8*1024*1024] --blocksize=$[8*1024] --open-au-nr=5 --random
8MiB 10.3M/s
4MiB 17.1M/s
2MiB 16.7M/s
1MiB 16.2M/s
512KiB 15M/s
256KiB 13.3M/s
128KiB 10.9M/s
64KiB 11M/s
32KiB 7.95M/s
16KiB 4.48M/s
8KiB 1.8M/s
$ ./flashbench /dev/sdc --open-au --erasesize=$[8*1024*1024] --blocksize=$[8*1024] --open-au-nr=6 --random
8MiB 13.4M/s
4MiB 4.27M/s
2MiB 2.26M/s
1MiB 1.2M/s
512KiB 621K/s
^C
## And this looks like 5 open-au in random mode.
$ ./flashbench /dev/sdc -f --erasesize=$[8*1024*1024]
8MiB 17.2M/s 17.8M/s 17.1M/s 17.8M/s 17.5M/s 17.5M/s
4MiB 16.9M/s 17.7M/s 17M/s 17.8M/s 17.5M/s 17.5M/s
2MiB 16.8M/s 17.6M/s 17M/s 17.6M/s 17.5M/s 17.4M/s
1MiB 16.7M/s 17.6M/s 17M/s 17.5M/s 17.4M/s 17.5M/s
512KiB 16.6M/s 17.2M/s 17.4M/s 17.1M/s 16.9M/s 16.5M/s
256KiB 16.4M/s 17M/s 17.2M/s 16.9M/s 16.6M/s 16.6M/s
128KiB 16.5M/s 16.2M/s 16.6M/s 16.3M/s 16.1M/s 16.1M/s
64KiB 16.5M/s 17.1M/s 16.4M/s 17.2M/s 17M/s 17M/s
32KiB 15.4M/s 16.3M/s 15.5M/s 16.1M/s 16M/s 16.1M/s
16KiB 13M/s 13.5M/s 13.2M/s 13.5M/s 13.5M/s 13.5M/s