linaro-dev February 2011

linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org

120 participants
166 discussions

by Jamie Bennett

Hi, The Linaro 11.05 Alpha-2 image [1] is set to be released on Thursday 3rd February (in two days !) [2] and we need your help. In addition to our in-house validation testing we ask anyone with supported hardware, as found on: http://releases.linaro.org/platform/linaro-n/hwpacks/alpha-2-rc/ to test the Alpha-2 release candidates at: Headless: http://releases.linaro.org/platform/linaro-n/headless/alpha-2-rc/ ALIP: http://releases.linaro.org/platform/linaro-n/alip/alpha-2-rc/ Netbook: http://releases.linaro.org/platform/linaro-n/netbook/alpha-2-rc/ and our new image, Developer Tools image: http://releases.linaro.org/platform/linaro-n/developer/alpha-2-rc/ Please note that due to a lack of committed support the Plasma image has been dropped from our list of regularly tested images. If you would like to see the Plasma image return and can give support to the maintenance and testing of this image please get in contact with me. Please make your way to: http://wiki.linaro.org/Releases/DailyBuilds for an explanation on how to test and submit your results to the QA tracker at: http://qatracker.linaro.org For an explanation of how to use the qatracker please see: https://wiki.linaro.org/QA/QATracker Regards, Jamie. -- Linaro Release Manager [1] https://wiki.linaro.org/Process/Cycle/Alpha1Release [2] https://wiki.linaro.org/Releases/1105/Schedule

15 years

Re: Linaro Image Tools 0.4.3 released

by Loïc Minier

On Wed, Feb 02, 2011, Avik Sil wrote: > Won't the link be https://launchpad.net/linaro-image-tools/+milestone/0.4.3? Yes; I failed to s/0.4.2/0.4.3 when resending; grmpf -- Loïc Minier

15 years

[PATCH] arm: Improve MMC performance on Versatile Express

by Pawel Moll

VE suffers from serious problem with MMC transfers - low performance, errors when other IO peripherals (especially USB) are used at the same time etc. It all boils down to the MMC controller short FIFO and - in result - timing constrains. The most problematic case - USB driver hogging CPU and MMC FIFO under/overruns in the result - can be mitigated on SMP system by distributing interrupts handling for these peripherals between cores. With this, the MMC card clock can be safely (at least it looks like it) increased to 1.5MHz, improving performance. Signed-off-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll(a)arm.com> --- arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c index 4b5af01..300ac72 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c @@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ static unsigned int v2m_mmci_status(struct device *dev) static struct mmci_platform_data v2m_mmci_data = { .ocr_mask = MMC_VDD_32_33|MMC_VDD_33_34, .status = v2m_mmci_status, + .f_max = 1500000, }; static AMBA_DEVICE(aaci, "mb:aaci", V2M_AACI, NULL); @@ -391,6 +392,19 @@ static void __init v2m_init(void) for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(v2m_amba_devs); i++) amba_device_register(v2m_amba_devs[i], &iomem_resource); + /* WARNING: HACK HACK HACK! + * + * MMCI cell has very tight timing requirements regarding interrupt + * handling (fractions of millisecond), while the USB host controller + * interrupt handler can hog the CPU for more then 1 millisecond! + * + * To mitigate the problem on SMP systems, we can set CPU affinities + * of these interrupts to different cores... */ + BUG_ON(v2m_usb_resources[1].flags != IORESOURCE_IRQ); + irq_set_affinity(v2m_usb_resources[1].start, cpumask_of(0)); + irq_set_affinity(mmci_device.irq[0], cpumask_of(1)); + irq_set_affinity(mmci_device.irq[1], cpumask_of(1)); + pm_power_off = v2m_power_off; arm_pm_restart = v2m_restart; -- 1.6.3.3

15 years

Re: [PATCH] arm: Improve MMC performance on Versatile Express

by Russell King - ARM Linux

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 05:54:18PM -0000, Pawel Moll wrote: > $ git am 0001-arm-Improve-MMC-performance-on-Versatile-Express.patch > > / # uname -a > Linux (none) 2.6.38-rc2+ #12 SMP Mon Jan 24 17:41:53 GMT 2011 armv7l GNU/Linux > / # cat /dev/sda > /dev/null & > / # dd if=/dev/mmcblk0 of=/dev/null bs=64k count=128 > 128+0 records in > 128+0 records out > 8388608 bytes (8.0MB) copied, 1.501529 seconds, 5.3MB/s > > > THERE IS NO ISSUE WITH MMCI. THE HARDWARE DOES NOT NEED "FIXING". > > I'm really pleased you think so. It's always nice to have happy customers :-) If you're flooding the system with USB traffic, enlargening the FIFO size won't help. Making the FIFO larger just decreases the _interrupt_ _latency_ requirements. It doesn't mean you can cope with the amount of data being transferred. if (cycles-to-transfer-usb-packets + cycles-to-transfer-MMC-data > available-cpu-cycles) you_are_stuffed(even_with_larger_fifo); So I'm not surprised that running USB and MMC at full speed results in MMC losing out. You will find that even with a larger FIFO, MMC will still lose out. Why? The ISP1761 can store the packets without complaint, and the host CPU can read them when it's ready. As soon as one packet is read off the host, the next packet is probably sitting there waiting for the host CPU to read it. When the ISP1761 buffer becomes full, it can tell the device to stop sending data. The result of that is the ISP1761 will be able to transfer data as fast as the host CPU can possibly go - to the exclusion of the MMC interface. No amount of FIFO (well, except several KB to cover the _largest_ size of MMC transfer we request) will resolve the problem of USB and MMC sharing the same CPU.

15 years

l-m-c console arguments

by Amit Kucheria

Hi, I just tried to create an SD image for the beagle with l-m-c from bzr. The kernel command-line ends up containing 'console=tty0 console=NONE,115200n8'. Board configuration problem? Overriding l-m-c with --console ttyO2 doesn't work since it is added before the other consoles, so doesn't end up getting input. Shouldn't it be the last console added in the list? Regards, Amit

15 years

Re: Bazaar and Launchpad though proxy]

by Martin Pool

Dechesne, Nicolas wrote: > I actually wrote the instructions on the wiki above. but you need to use the full bzr+ssh:// link as I put on the wiki. i have not been able to use shorthand link using lp: type of link. If you have the http_proxy environment variable set to something that allows outgoing http, and if you have a recent bzr (from eg Ubuntu Maverick) then lp urls should work through a proxy. You can set the proxy variable in the GNOME Proxy control panel, or just eg from your .bashrc: export http_proxy=http://proxy.example.com:8080/ But it may be simpler to just use bzr+ssh. Some of the ssh urls are different, for example to get a default source package branch you need eg bzr log bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/+branch/ubuntu/maverick/bash If you have any other problems please don't hesitate to ask in #launchpad on irc, or http://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/ -- Martin

15 years

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

linaro-dev February 2011