linaro-dev

linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org

4332 discussions

latest device tree patches for ARM u-boot

by John Rigby

Latest patches went to u-boot mailing list today. For interested parties who do not hang out ton the u-boot mailing list, you can also see them in the arm-fdt branch of my experimental u-boot tree on git.linaro.org: http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/jcrigby/u-boot.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/… Comments welcome. Thanks John

14 years, 4 months

linaro-image-tools moving to a package

by Loïc Minier

Hi I've packaged linaro-image-tools[1] into the Linaro Tools PPA[2] for lucid and maverick (and into Ubuntu maverick, but pending review there). Please prefer the package over a bzr checkout[3] as that will allow us to track versions a bit better. Report bugs against the linaro-image-tools project[4] or against the linaro-image-tools Ubuntu source package[5] if you're seeing the bug with the Ubuntu version of the package. Thanks! [1] https://launchpad.net/linaro-image-tools [2] https://launchpad.net/~linaro-maintainers/+archive/tools [3] lp:linaro-image-tools [4] https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-image-tools/+filebug [5] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linaro-image-tools/+filebug -- Loïc Minier

14 years, 4 months

[PM] 01/09/10 - Minutes for the Power Management WG weekly call

by Amit Kucheria

The minutes of the weekly call can be found at: https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Meetings/2010-09-01 Attendees: Linaro: Amit Kucheria, Amit Arora, Yong Shen, Vishwanath Sripathy ARM: Robin Randhawa, Srinivas Kalaga Regards, Amit

14 years, 4 months

Packaging problems with armel-cross-toolchain-base

by Marcin Juszkiewicz

Hi First some informations. "armel-cross-toolchain" is a package which will generate armel cross toolchain for x86(-64) machines (but nothing keeps from building powerpc->armel one etc). Do to that I am building several stages of linux/eglibc/gcc-4.5/binutils in proper order. This is called 'bootstrap' way of building cross compiler and can be automated (which can not be done with Embedian way which we used before). In last week I did a split of package into 2 steps: - armel-cross-toolchain-base - armel-cross-toolchain Where first one provides binutils, linux headers, libc6 and libgcc packages. Second provides final gcc. My armel-cross-toolchain-base package got to the moment when it builds out of box on Ubuntu maverick. But build != upload ;( And here I need some help. As you can see on page [1] package got built [2] but then was rejected to be uploaded [3]. Here my Debian/Ubuntu packaging skills ends as I never imported any package to those systems. According to people from #launchpad my package is buggy as it is producing a binutils binary which expects to be built from a binutils source. Whereas mine source package is neither named binutils nor does it have that version. So problem is how to get it done... So far I tried ugly hacks like: sed -i -e "s/^binutils/armel-cross-toolchain-base/g" debian/changelog; \ sed -i -e "s/^Source: binutils/Source: armel-cross-toolchain-base/g" debian/control.in; \ sed -i -e "s/^Source: binutils/Source: armel-cross-toolchain-base/g" debian/control; \ But this does not look right for me and require more changes in linux packaging as it uses changelog name as base for package names. So help me please if you have ideas. 1. https://edge.launchpad.net/~hrw/+archive/arm-cross-compiler/+build/1940050 2. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/54624642/buildlog_ubuntu-maverick-i386.armel-… 3. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/54624644/upload_1942031_log.txt Regards, -- JID: hrw(a)jabber.org Website: http://marcin.juszkiewicz.com.pl/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/marcinjuszkiewicz

14 years, 4 months

Vexpress mtdparts question

by Matt Waddel

I am trying to map the nor flash on the Versatile Express platform to an mtd partition. I have tried a bunch of variations with the kernel command line "mtdparts" directive, without success. Here is the last one I tried: mtdparts=armflash-1.0:1M(uboot),9M(linux),16M(uInitrd) The kernel seems to detect the flash parts correctly: ... armflash-0: Found 2 x16 devices at 0x0 in 32-bit bank Intel/Sharp Extended Query Table at 0x010A Intel/Sharp Extended Query Table at 0x010A Intel/Sharp Extended Query Table at 0x010A Intel/Sharp Extended Query Table at 0x010A Intel/Sharp Extended Query Table at 0x010A Using buffer write method Using auto-unlock on power-up/resume cfi_cmdset_0001: Erase suspend on write enabled armflash-1: Found 2 x16 devices at 0x0 in 32-bit bank Intel/Sharp Extended Query Table at 0x010A Intel/Sharp Extended Query Table at 0x010A Intel/Sharp Extended Query Table at 0x010A Intel/Sharp Extended Query Table at 0x010A Intel/Sharp Extended Query Table at 0x010A Using buffer write method Using auto-unlock on power-up/resume cfi_cmdset_0001: Erase suspend on write enabled Concatenating MTD devices: (0): "armflash-0" (1): "armflash-1" into device "armflash" RedBoot partition parsing not available ... $ cat /proc/mtd dev: size erasesize name <nothing listed> Any ideas? Thanks, Matt

14 years, 4 months

Call for testing: Linaro 10.11 Beta Candidate

by Jamie Bennett

Hi, According to the schedule [1], the Beta release [2] is due in two days. The release team have selected a beta candidate and would like your helping in testing the images to ensure that they are of Beta quality. If you have the hardware available, currently OMAP Beagleboard and ARM Versatile Express (ca9x4_ct_vxp) then you could help. The steps involved in testing are: 1) Download the correct image for your board, OMAP [3] or Versatile Express [4]. 2) Install the image on your device (instructions can be found on the Beta release page [2]). 3) Log in or create an account at http://qatracker.linaro.org. 4) Test according to the test cases for your board by following the instructions on qatracker. 5) Submit your results to qatracker, file bugs, come joins us on the irc channel [5] to ask questions. Hopefully with your help, we can make the Beta release rock. Regards, Jamie. -- Linaro Release Manager [1] http://wiki.linaro.org/Releases/1011#Linaro10.11Schedule [2] http://wiki.linaro.org/Releases/1011/Beta [3] OMAP - http://snapshots.linaro.org/10.11-daily/linaro-headless/20100831/1/images/t… [4] Versatile Express - http://snapshots.linaro.org/10.11-daily/linaro-headless-vexpress/20100831/2… [5] #linaro on irc.freenode.net

14 years, 4 months

Linaro and ARMv5

by Pedro I. Sanchez

Hello, I'm looking for some advice on the feasibility of using Linaro on one of my projects based on an AT91SAM9260 Atmel processor, which has an ARM926EJ-S ARMv5 processor core. I see that the Linaro builds do not support v5 and I wonder, what would be involved in "recompiling" Linaro with v5 support? Is there anyone else looking at this possibility? Any suggestions? Thanks, -- Pedro

14 years, 4 months

linux-linaro pull request

by John Rigby

The following changes since commit 7a949698c262fab1f0ecac8adf3ceb7eaafa8c8c: John Rigby (1): LINARO: Linaro-2.6.35-1004.8 are available in the git repository at: git://git.linaro.org/ubuntu/linux-linaro.git linaro John Rigby (2): LINARO: Start new release LINARO: Linaro-2.6.35-1004.9 Mike Rapoport (1): OMAP: DSS2: OMAPFB: use phys_to_virt for RAM mappings Robert Nelson (3): ARM: OMAP: Beagle: revision detection ARM: OMAP: Beagle: only Cx boards use pin 23 for write protect ARM: OMAP: Beagle: no gpio_wp pin connection on xM arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c | 93 +++++- arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/vram.h | 1 + debian.linaro/abi/2.6.35-1003.7/abiname | 1 - debian.linaro/abi/2.6.35-1004.8/abiname | 1 + .../armel/linaro-mx51 | 169 +++++----- .../armel/linaro-mx51.modules | 0 .../armel/linaro-omap | 369 ++++++++++---------- .../armel/linaro-omap.modules | 6 + .../armel/linaro-vexpress | 3 + .../armel/linaro-vexpress.modules | 0 debian.linaro/changelog | 15 + drivers/video/omap2/omapfb/omapfb-main.c | 2 +- drivers/video/omap2/vram.c | 10 + 13 files changed, 406 insertions(+), 264 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 debian.linaro/abi/2.6.35-1003.7/abiname create mode 100644 debian.linaro/abi/2.6.35-1004.8/abiname rename debian.linaro/abi/{2.6.35-1003.7 => 2.6.35-1004.8}/armel/linaro-mx51 (98%) rename debian.linaro/abi/{2.6.35-1003.7 => 2.6.35-1004.8}/armel/linaro-mx51.modules (100%) rename debian.linaro/abi/{2.6.35-1003.7 => 2.6.35-1004.8}/armel/linaro-omap (97%) rename debian.linaro/abi/{2.6.35-1003.7 => 2.6.35-1004.8}/armel/linaro-omap.modules (99%) rename debian.linaro/abi/{2.6.35-1003.7 => 2.6.35-1004.8}/armel/linaro-vexpress (99%) rename debian.linaro/abi/{2.6.35-1003.7 => 2.6.35-1004.8}/armel/linaro-vexpress.modules (100%)

14 years, 4 months

How to involve into the linaro development

by nvhariharan＠gmail.com

Hi All, I am having experience in Omap, imx based linux platforms. How shall I involve myself into the linaro development, I am into this maillist and using the linaro distribution into beagle board, since all the participants are having linaro mail ids, Kindly advise me and use me as a resource for this development. Thanks, Hariharan Veerappan Software Architect, EmbDes Technologies, Bangalore, India. Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel

14 years, 4 months

linux-meta-linaro pull request

by John Rigby

The following changes since commit 09b46239478bd267afcc398dceff7782f686af82: John Rigby (1): LINARO: Linaro-2.6.35.1003.8 are available in the git repository at: git://git.linaro.org/ubuntu/linux-meta-linaro.git master John Rigby (1): LINARO: Linaro-2.6.35-1004.9 meta-source/debian/changelog | 6 ++++++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

14 years, 4 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

linaro-dev