On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Christian Robottom Reis kiko@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 09:19:18AM -0700, Jesse Barker wrote:
Those are only the session blueprints for the scheduler.
Of course, I had forgotten about this silliness. Hopefully this is being less expensive now that we have less sessions and the UI is a little bit better.
Absolutely. We only have 4 sessions and could possibly have gotten away with slightly fewer.
Long-term, I really want to see us have the ability to conveniently schedule a session independently or not of having a blueprint for us.
Sure. This is strictly a function of leveraging the summit scheduler. For Cambourne and presumably for SF in February, we won't have to worry about this.
cheers, Jesse