On Tuesday 05 July 2011, Ashish Jangam wrote:
DA9053 chip submission was done by Linaro and now they have agreed that we will be only responsible for DA9053 submission too so now we can skip the posted DA9053 patch.
Ok.
Regarding file naming convention da9052 seems to be appropriate since DA9053 chip is update of DA9052 and also DA9052 is the umbrella name for the whole family.
What about the existing da903x drivers for leds, touchscreen, battery, regulator and backlight? Are they all completely distinct from the da905x line?
Arnd