Benoit,
On 11/16/2011 09:14 AM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
Hi Rob,
On 11/16/2011 3:50 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On 11/16/2011 05:02 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
console device on OMAP is never reset or idled by hwmod post initial setup, early during boot, for obvious reasons not to break early debug prints thrown on console. This leaves the console device enabled at boot and the first activation of it using hwmod needs to be handled in such a way that a disable is called followed by an enable of the hwmod, the subsequent activations can then use the default activation technique.
To handle this add a new binding to identify a hwmod which is used as the console device.
This patch is based on the what is done in serial.c for non-DT builds.
Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayakrnayak@ti.com
.../devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/omap.txt | 1 + arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/omap.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/omap.txt index dbdab40..46ffd41 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/omap.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/omap.txt @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ Required properties: Optional properties:
- ti,no_idle_on_suspend: When present, it prevents the PM to idle
the module during suspend. +- ti,console_hwmod: boolean, identifies the hwmod used as console device
This doesn't seem right. Which console is not a h/w property. Why can't you use aliases like other platforms are doing?
Also, it's not clear in the documentation where this (and ti,no_idle_on_suspend) should go in the DT. Both seem like they should be kernel cmdline params.
That raise the question about using DT to pass linux specific parameter. We already discuss that on the mailing list, but never get a clear answer. It seems that DT is already used to provide some OS specific information using the "linux," prefix for example.
True, but "linux," properties will always face resistance and scrutiny.
There are clearly a couple of parameters that can be provided by the bootloader, but that does not reflect a HW property.
So what is the guideline for that, should we stick to cmdline params for that?
I would say that if the setting does not depend on something in the DT, then the cmdline is the right place. If you have a property that references a phandle, then it can't be on the cmdline. For console selection, there is already a defined way to select it with console=blah. And there is an agreed way to define indexes in the DT with aliases.
How were these properties set without DT?
Quoting Grant's documentation, runtime configuration is supported:
"Runtime configuration
In most cases, a DT will be the sole method of communicating data from firmware to the kernel, so also gets used to pass in runtime and configuration data like the kernel parameters string and the location of an initrd image.
Most of this data is contained in the /chosen node, and when booting Linux it will look something like this:
chosen { bootargs = "console=ttyS0,115200 loglevel=8"; initrd-start = <0xc8000000>; initrd-end = <0xc8200000>; };The bootargs property contains the kernel arguments, and the initrd-* properties define the address and size of an initrd blob. The chosen node may also optionally contain an arbitrary number of additional properties for platform-specific configuration data."
Does that mean that this is supported only if the bootloader does not support cmdline?
No. I think it means chosen can be extended. However, how many other chosen properties are defined? Not very many. Clearly, it's not a place for adding whatever random property you want. chosen is really the boot interface between the bootloader and kernel as it is ATAG type data.
Rob