Hi Arnd,
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:37:48PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Monday 07 March 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile index 0d43be9..540697e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile @@ -18,3 +18,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_EUKREA_CPUIMX51SD) += board-cpuimx51sd.o obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_EUKREA_MBIMXSD51_BASEBOARD) += eukrea_mbimxsd-baseboard.o obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_MX51_EFIKAMX) += board-mx51_efikamx.o obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_MX50_RDP) += board-mx50_rdp.o +obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_MX51_DT) += board-dt.o
If board-dt.c is mx51 specific, would it be sane to name it something like board-mx51-dt.c? We have mx53 stuff in this folder as well.
Alternatively, it could be done the other way round: rename the identifiers in the file from mx51_ to mx5_, and make sure that they don't contain any mx51 specific settings but always refer to properties in the device tree for the differences.
So our ultimate goal is to have only one board-dt.c in one mach-xxx?