On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:11:19PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote: ...
+struct clk_ops {
- int (*prepare)(struct clk_hw *hw);
- void (*unprepare)(struct clk_hw *hw);
- int (*enable)(struct clk_hw *hw);
- void (*disable)(struct clk_hw *hw);
- int (*is_enabled)(struct clk_hw *hw);
- unsigned long (*recalc_rate)(struct clk_hw *hw,
unsigned long parent_rate);
I believe I have heard people love the interface with parent_rate passed in. I love that too. But I would like to ask the same thing on .round_rate and .set_rate as well for the same reason why we have it for .recalc_rate.
- long (*round_rate)(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long,
unsigned long *);
Yes, we already have parent_rate passed in .round_rate with an pointer. But I think it'd be better to have it passed in no matter flag CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set or not. Something like:
8<--- @@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_get_rate); */ unsigned long __clk_round_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) { - unsigned long unused; + unsigned long parent_rate = 0;
if (!clk) return -EINVAL; @@ -592,10 +592,10 @@ unsigned long __clk_round_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) if (!clk->ops->round_rate) return clk->rate;
- if (clk->flags & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT) - return clk->ops->round_rate(clk->hw, rate, &unused); - else - return clk->ops->round_rate(clk->hw, rate, NULL); + if (clk->parent) + parent_rate = clk->parent->rate; + + return clk->ops->round_rate(clk->hw, rate, &parent_rate); }
/** @@ -765,9 +765,12 @@ static void clk_calc_subtree(struct clk *clk, unsigned long new_rate) static struct clk *clk_calc_new_rates(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) { struct clk *top = clk; - unsigned long best_parent_rate = clk->parent->rate; + unsigned long best_parent_rate = 0; unsigned long new_rate;
+ if (clk->parent) + best_parent_rate = clk->parent->rate; + if (!clk->ops->round_rate && !(clk->flags & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT)) { clk->new_rate = clk->rate; return NULL; @@ -780,10 +783,7 @@ static struct clk *clk_calc_new_rates(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) goto out; }
- if (clk->flags & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT) - new_rate = clk->ops->round_rate(clk->hw, rate, &best_parent_rate); - else - new_rate = clk->ops->round_rate(clk->hw, rate, NULL); + new_rate = clk->ops->round_rate(clk->hw, rate, &best_parent_rate);
if (best_parent_rate != clk->parent->rate) { top = clk_calc_new_rates(clk->parent, best_parent_rate);
--->8
The reason behind the change is that any clk implements .round_rate will mostly need to get the parent rate, no matter flag CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT is set or not. Instead of expecting every .round_rate implementation to get the parent rate in the way beloe
parent_rate = __clk_get_rate(__clk_get_parent(hw->clk));
we can just pass the parent rate into .round_rate.
- int (*set_parent)(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index);
- u8 (*get_parent)(struct clk_hw *hw);
- int (*set_rate)(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long);
For the same reason, I would change .set_rate interface like below.
8<---
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c index d5ac6a7..6bd8037 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c @@ -119,7 +119,8 @@ static long clk_divider_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_divider_round_rate);
-static int clk_divider_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate) +static int clk_divider_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, + unsigned long parent_rate) { struct clk_divider *divider = to_clk_divider(hw); unsigned int div; diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c index dbc310a..d74ac4b 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c @@ -833,17 +833,18 @@ static struct clk *clk_propagate_rate_change(struct clk *clk, unsigned long even static void clk_change_rate(struct clk *clk) { struct clk *child; - unsigned long old_rate; + unsigned long old_rate, parent_rate = 0; struct hlist_node *tmp;
old_rate = clk->rate; + if (clk->parent) + parent_rate = clk->parent->rate;
if (clk->ops->set_rate) - clk->ops->set_rate(clk->hw, clk->new_rate); + clk->ops->set_rate(clk->hw, clk->new_rate, parent_rate);
if (clk->ops->recalc_rate) - clk->rate = clk->ops->recalc_rate(clk->hw, - clk->parent->rate); + clk->rate = clk->ops->recalc_rate(clk->hw, parent_rate); else clk->rate = clk->parent->rate;
diff --git a/include/linux/clk-provider.h b/include/linux/clk-provider.h index 5508897..1031f1f 100644 --- a/include/linux/clk-provider.h +++ b/include/linux/clk-provider.h @@ -125,7 +125,8 @@ struct clk_ops { unsigned long *); int (*set_parent)(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index); u8 (*get_parent)(struct clk_hw *hw); - int (*set_rate)(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long); + int (*set_rate)(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long, + unsigned long); void (*init)(struct clk_hw *hw); };
--->8
Then with parent rate passed into .round_rate and .set_rate like what we do with .recalc_rate right now, we can save particular clk implementation from calling __clk_get_parent() and __clk_get_rate to get parent rate.
For example, the following will the be diff we gain on clk-divider.
8<---
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c index 6bd8037..8a28ffb 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c @@ -68,8 +68,8 @@ static int clk_divider_bestdiv(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, if (divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED) maxdiv--;
- if (!best_parent_rate) { - parent_rate = __clk_get_rate(__clk_get_parent(hw->clk)); + if (!(divider->flags & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT)) { + parent_rate = *best_parent_rate; bestdiv = DIV_ROUND_UP(parent_rate, rate); bestdiv = bestdiv == 0 ? 1 : bestdiv; bestdiv = bestdiv > maxdiv ? maxdiv : bestdiv; @@ -109,13 +109,7 @@ static long clk_divider_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, int div; div = clk_divider_bestdiv(hw, rate, prate);
- if (prate) - return *prate / div; - else { - unsigned long r; - r = __clk_get_rate(__clk_get_parent(hw->clk)); - return r / div; - } + return *prate / div; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_divider_round_rate);
@@ -127,7 +121,7 @@ static int clk_divider_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, unsigned long flags = 0; u32 val;
- div = __clk_get_rate(__clk_get_parent(hw->clk)) / rate; + div = parent_rate / rate;
if (!(divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED)) div--;
--->8
I always get a sense of worry in using functions named in __xxx which sounds like something somehow internal. With the requested interface change above, I can get all __xxx functions out of my clk_ops implementation.
- void (*init)(struct clk_hw *hw);
+};